Author |
Message |
Len Parker
|
|
|
|
Eric S
|
Posted: Mon 10 Dec, 2018 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A great collection but look at the horrible images, what a waste, we could probably learn a lot from these armors if they were correctly photographed but dont hold your breath.
https://www.pinterest.com/worldantiques/
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
|
|
|
Craig Peters
|
Posted: Thu 10 Jan, 2019 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Eric S wrote: |
A great collection but look at the horrible images, what a waste, we could probably learn a lot from these armors if they were correctly photographed but dont hold your breath. |
Actually Eric, at least some of the photographs are excellent. You simply have to download the original file from Wikipedia. The image entitled "Ringbrynja_med_halvarmar_-_Livrustkammaren_-_106763.tif" is 6,870 pixels by 5,402 pixels in size, for example. Here's a close up of a section of the mail in the picture, so you can see what that looks like.
Attachment: 309.66 KB
[ Download ]
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
|
|
|
Eric S
|
Posted: Tue 05 Feb, 2019 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
len, your right about this image, its very clear, close and detailed, and there are some other very good images as will but there are a huge amount of armor images and weapons images at the museum, including a lot of really rare armors that do not have close detailed images. Before they were on Wiki I would use the museum database and I guess I am a bit fustrated seeing all these amazing items were you can not see the details.
https://www.pinterest.com/worldantiques/
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
|
|
|
Dan Howard
|
Posted: Fri 26 Apr, 2019 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Need a much bigger photo than that.
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen and Sword Books
|
|
|
|
Matthew Amt
|
Posted: Fri 26 Apr, 2019 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Huh, I'm seeing some little bumps or bulges that look like riveted joints to me. Some rings are broken or open but it's pretty corroded, those could just be damage.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
|
|
|
Matthew Amt
|
Posted: Fri 26 Apr, 2019 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, Erik Schmid noted that Roman mail overlapped backwards from medieval mail. Drove him crazy reproducing it, of course, because he basically had to do everything left-handed!
Matthew
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
Posted: Fri 26 Apr, 2019 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
No Matthew, the opposite. I'm saying I think this mail is like medieval mail, not roman. Look at the center of the left section of mail. I think there's a single ring showing this.
|
|
|
|
Mart Shearer
|
Posted: Fri 26 Apr, 2019 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree, Len. It appears to be right-hand helix, typical medieval.
ferrum ferro acuitur et homo exacuit faciem amici sui
|
|
|
|
Dan Howard
|
Posted: Fri 26 Apr, 2019 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Len Parker wrote: | Dan, click on Stor and you can make it as big as you want. |
All riveted, right over left overlap. 15th C European seems a reasonable assessment.
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen and Sword Books
|
|
|
|
Dan Howard
|
Posted: Fri 26 Apr, 2019 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mart Shearer wrote: | I agree, Len. It appears to be right-hand helix, typical medieval. |
Yep. If it is Roman then it is unique. Late Medieval European is more likely.
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen and Sword Books
|
|
|
|
Matthew Amt
|
Posted: Fri 26 Apr, 2019 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Len Parker wrote: | No Matthew, the opposite. I'm saying I think this mail is like medieval mail, not roman. Look at the center of the left section of mail. I think there's a single ring showing this. |
Oh, sorry, I misunderstood what you were saying! No argument from me.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
|
|
|
|