Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search


myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term.
Last 10 Donors: Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors)

Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > Mythbusters Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Hank Reinhardt
Industry Professional



Location: oxford,ga.
Joined: 10 Nov 2005
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 138

PostPosted: Thu 30 Nov, 2006 7:57 am    Post subject: Mythbusters         Reply with quote

Several months ago I was contacted by Michael Bell, a contact rep for Mythbusters. He wanted information regarding Japanese swords and cutting a machine gun barrel in half. I told him it was impossible, but gave him all the information that he requested. I heard back from him last week about the show. Unfortunately I missed it, but will try to catch it when it comes on aain. Seems that they ended heating the macinegun barrel up to 2000 degrees, then had a machine it the barrel, and all it managed to do was bend it. They did get the blade to penetrate almost a quarter of an inch. Michael said that they broke a lot of swords, and hit it harder than any human could strike. I hope that this puts to rest the nonsense of cutting a machine gun barrel in half. I'm going to suggest that they dtry letting a silk scarf fall on a sword and see if it will cut the scarf in half. Hank
Hank Reinhardt
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Steve L.





Joined: 22 Jul 2006

Posts: 65

PostPosted: Thu 30 Nov, 2006 8:03 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Quote:
Michael said that they broke a lot of swords, and hit it harder than any human could strike.


Evil Evil Evil

I guess (hope!!!) that was not real katana! WTF?!
View user's profile Send private message
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Thu 30 Nov, 2006 8:13 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I have moved this topic to the Off-topic Talk forum.

Please note the description for this forum:

"Discussions of general history and other miscellaneous topics relating to arms and armour that do not specifically fit our other forums"

Thank you.

Happy

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Scott Hanson




Location: La Crosse, WI
Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Likes: 3 pages
Reading list: 6 books

Posts: 154

PostPosted: Thu 30 Nov, 2006 8:19 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I saw that episode. I wish they would have used a linkage instead of just a rotating arm, but I'm sure the results would have been the same. I just like to see tests done as accurately as possible.

As far as "real katanas" being broken, I guess that depends on what you mean. They broke a number of replica katanas. They looked like decent but not great replicas. The sword that did damage the gun didn't take really obvious damage itself, and I believe the credits said it was an Angel sword. Not sure if Angel provided all the replicas or just the one they described as a "high hardness modern alloy sword".
View user's profile Send private message
Hank Reinhardt
Industry Professional



Location: oxford,ga.
Joined: 10 Nov 2005
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 138

PostPosted: Thu 30 Nov, 2006 10:50 am    Post subject: Mythbusters         Reply with quote

Actaully it doesn't matter if they were old katans or not. (except for the value they would have destroyed had they been old one.Nor would sharpness matter. It is a question of force applied, the matter being cut, and the item used in the cutting.Cutting a thick piece of steel, even one relatively soft at about 35 Rockwell, requires far more force than the human body can generate.
I have heard the Angel makes very good swords using some modern alloys, but have never tested one to see how it performs. Hank

Hank Reinhardt
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Risto Rautiainen




Location: Kontiolahti, Finland
Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Reading list: 10 books

Posts: 176

PostPosted: Thu 30 Nov, 2006 11:07 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I wish they would make a show about the myth of clumsy knights and the myth of cumbersome armour. How about the myth of not being able to ge on a horse without a crane? Or how about the myth of overweight european knightly swords? The myth of the 10-pound sword? How about it Mr. Reinhardt, as you already are in contact with them ... Wink
View user's profile Send private message
Scott Hanson




Location: La Crosse, WI
Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Likes: 3 pages
Reading list: 6 books

Posts: 154

PostPosted: Thu 30 Nov, 2006 11:09 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Sorry, wasn't meaning to imply that an antique katana would have had a chance. Just trying to answer the question of whether or not "real" katanas had been destroyed. If Steve meant real = antique, then no. If real = physical object as opposed to say, computer modeling of the test, then yes, real katanas were destroyed. My comment on quality was as to the potential value of the swords, not the cutting ability.

I'm a mechanical engineer, so I'm well aware of the factors involved. That is why I wished they would have used a linkage. You can make a rotational rig that develops the same force, as they did, but I'm sure someone will argue that swordsmen don't strike by just rotating their torsos, and claim the test wasn't valid. With a linkage designed to simulate a strike from a human more closely, that "argument" dissolves.
View user's profile Send private message
Hank Reinhardt
Industry Professional



Location: oxford,ga.
Joined: 10 Nov 2005
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 138

PostPosted: Thu 30 Nov, 2006 12:25 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I am sure that in other forums you will have people insisting that the test wasn't valid for any number of reason. Mainly because they want to believe a sword will cut that well.
On the other show they did aobut cutting a sword in half, they had some swordsman cutting some ballistic gelatin. I had a feeling that the guy never heard of a drw cut, as when I played it back, he just chopped, no draw cutting at all.Hank

Hank Reinhardt
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Grayson C.




Location: NCF, Sarasota, FL
Joined: 25 Oct 2006

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 223

PostPosted: Thu 30 Nov, 2006 12:37 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I think that European myths should be tested. While the cumbersomeness of armour might not make for a particularly great episode, several myths like these would however.

Also, Hank, I believe that all tests should be done by a VERIFIED specialist, not some japanophile self proclaimed expert swinging some sharpened steel Laughing Out Loud . And I half expected those Katanas to be made of stainless If you are going to test sword myths, make sure you have an EXPERT!


I think this myth was proven false before it even started because it is a fact that you cannot cut through steel without specialized equipment. Swords were simply not designed for this and it is absurd to think they would Happy
View user's profile Send private message
John Cooksey




Location: NW Ark
Joined: 15 Nov 2003

Posts: 291

PostPosted: Fri 01 Dec, 2006 9:05 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Grayson C. wrote:
I think that European myths should be tested. While the cumbersomeness of armour might not make for a particularly great episode, several myths like these would however.

Also, Hank, I believe that all tests should be done by a VERIFIED specialist, not some japanophile self proclaimed expert swinging some sharpened steel Laughing Out Loud . And I half expected those Katanas to be made of stainless If you are going to test sword myths, make sure you have an EXPERT!


I think this myth was proven false before it even started because it is a fact that you cannot cut through steel without specialized equipment. Swords were simply not designed for this and it is absurd to think they would Happy


What's a verified specialist?
There isn't exactly a licensing requirement. (grin)

I didn't surrender, but they took my horse and made him surrender.
View user's profile Send private message
Alex Oster




Location: Washington and Yokohama
Joined: 01 Mar 2004

Posts: 410

PostPosted: Fri 01 Dec, 2006 9:47 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

That reminds me, I get a kick out of how fight coreographers in movies are often refered to as "Swordmasters". "We had serveral swordmasters on set to help us in out in our stunts", ect...
The title seems a little misplaced to me. Maybe reenactment specialists, or fight scene directors, but "swordmaster"?, no, I don't agree with that label in those positions.

But I just woke up, so there ya go...

The pen is mightier than the sword, especially since it can get past security and be stabbed it into a jugular.
This site would be better if everytime I clicked submit... I got to hear a whip crack!
My collection: Various Blades & Conan related
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Chris Hanna





Joined: 10 Dec 2006

Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sun 10 Dec, 2006 4:19 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I would assume - and this is not based on any actual hard evidence or real knowledge, just a little thing called "mostly made up" - that the title of Sword Master is used in the same way as Martial Arts Master. These are guys that have trained a specific technique of sword fighting to the extent that Jet Li has trained in Wu Shu (sp?)
That's just my thought, feel free to contradict it with actual facts because I have none lol
View user's profile Send private message
Ed Toton




Location: Northern VA
Joined: 16 Sep 2005

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 462

PostPosted: Sun 10 Dec, 2006 7:31 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I too was very curious about the swords used, particularly in the sword-vs-sword tests. If at least some of them were Angel Sword, I'm afraid it doesn't tell me much. I know who they are, but I haven't formed an opinion on them yet. They used to be at the Maryland Renaissance Festival number of years ago; The rumor is that they were kicked out for misrepresenting their product (disclaimer-- I said rumor). I handled a few of their swords at the TX Renaissance Festival this season and wasn't as impressed as I hoped to be.

I'd love to see more specifics on the swords Mythbusters used, just for my own curiosity's sake.

-Ed T. Toton III
ed.toton.org | ModernChivalry.org
My armor photos on facebook
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Alex Oster




Location: Washington and Yokohama
Joined: 01 Mar 2004

Posts: 410

PostPosted: Sun 10 Dec, 2006 7:41 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I keep checking, but I haven't seen the episode listed yet... Anyone remember the name of it, or whatelse they did during it?
The pen is mightier than the sword, especially since it can get past security and be stabbed it into a jugular.
This site would be better if everytime I clicked submit... I got to hear a whip crack!
My collection: Various Blades & Conan related
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > Mythbusters
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum