
| myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term. Last 10 Donors: Adam James, Piotr H. Feret, Graham Shearlaw, Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins (View All Donors) |
| Author |
Message |
|
Garth Thompson
Industry Professional
Location: Alberta Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 7
|
Posted: Fri 03 Nov, 2006 10:12 pm Post subject: Rapier blade length |
|
|
Is the blade length on a rapier determined from tip to the edge of the grip, or from the tip to the edge of the guard? The examples I have seen can make up to a 2 inch difference.
Let the high praises of God be in their mouth, and a twoedged sword in their hand. Psalm 149:6
|
|
|
 |
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin


|
|
|
 |
Bill Grandy
myArmoury Team


|
Posted: Sat 04 Nov, 2006 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I generally do the same thing Nathan does. i.e. "A 40 inch blade with a two inch ricasso." But Nathan's right, people measure them in different ways. I know that in some period sources they measured all the way to the quillon (including the ricasso). The Spanish fencing master Narvaez said the perfect length for a rapier can be measured by setting the tip on the ground, and the quillons should reach the naval, so he clearly measured it to the quillon.
But if you ever decide to order a custom sword, definately be clear. I once ordered a custom rapier from A&A and requested a 43" blade... Craig later called me to double check whether I meant from the quillon or from where the blade comes out of the guard. It was a good thing he checked, because I meant from the guard, and we was going to do a 43" blade IN ADDITION to the ricasso, which would have been gigantic for me.
HistoricalHandcrafts.com
-Inspired by History, Crafted by Hand
"For practice is better than artfulness. Your exercise can do well without artfulness, but artfulness is not much good without the exercise.” -anonymous 15th century fencing master, MS 3227a
|
|
|
 |
Sean Flynt

|
|
|
 |
|
Geoff Wood
|
Posted: Tue 07 Nov, 2006 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bill Grandy wrote: | | . i.e. "A 40 inch blade with a two inch ricasso." |
Mr Grandy
Sorry, but even that can be taken two ways. In the context of this discussion I can see what you mean, but within the statement alone, 'with' could either mean 'including' or 'plus'. It is one of those ambiguous terms.
yeah, I know, i'm picky (and I know d*** all about rapiers)
Regards
Geoff
|
|
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2026 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|