Author |
Message |
Len Parker
|
|
|
|
Matthew Amt
|
Posted: Sat 29 May, 2021 4:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wacky. Mind you, the late Roman stuff isn't my strong area, but it's certainly not like anything I've ever seen. So my guess is that either someone dropped a later guard (maybe MUCH later) onto the tang, or someone took a much later sword and stuck that chape on the tip. OR all 3 parts were just stuck together and don't really go together.
Some of the other blades on that page, well, let's just say I'm a little skeptical of their dates, not that "4th-5th century" is very precise. Just gut reactions.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
Victor R.
|
Posted: Sat 29 May, 2021 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are you positive it's a guard, or potentially a scabbard fitting? The tabs on the ends could be part of a suspension system of some sort. Given the prevalence of organic grips, including pommel and guard, in that era, and the presence of the chape, I'd lean more towards fitting than cross. Speculation for certain, but possibly within the real of reason.
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
Posted: Sat 29 May, 2021 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's actually not that wide. If the tang is 13 cm long then the guard (if that's what it is) would be about 8.5 cm wide. There are plenty of guards wider in this period. It's the shape that's unique.
|
|
|
|
Matthew Amt
|
Posted: Sun 30 May, 2021 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Victor R. wrote: | Are you positive it's a guard, or potentially a scabbard fitting? The tabs on the ends could be part of a suspension system of some sort. Given the prevalence of organic grips, including pommel and guard, in that era, and the presence of the chape, I'd lean more towards fitting than cross. Speculation for certain, but possibly within the real of reason. |
It's MUCH more like some later guard than *any* suspension system I've seen, Roman or not. So I'm still voting for some kind of mashup.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
|
|
|
Matthew Amt
|
Posted: Sat 26 Jun, 2021 4:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's a very common first century BC Mainz-pattern gladius, with a brass guard plate that's bent along the middle. It would have been flat, and set into the base of a wooden guard. So it's not a guard by itself.
You mean the one lying on the newspapers? If you're looking at the little triangular feature at the tip of the guard, could that just be something printed on the paper, not on the sword? Otherwise, it's a tiny photo of a lump of rust...
Sorry, I'm not helping, there!
Matthew
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
|
|
|
Alex Indman
|
Posted: Sun 27 Jun, 2021 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I read the article. About this sword's guard it says "guard is diamond shaped, up to 10cm wide (8cm preserved), 1cm thick".
There is no precise dating given, just a range of late IV to early VI cc.
Actually the pictures immediately to the right of the old one you were looking at are of the same sword, taken recently.
Hope this helps.
Alex.
|
|
|
|
Matthew Amt
|
Posted: Sun 27 Jun, 2021 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Definitely Greek, and probably wildly misdated! 4th century *BC*, I'd say, possibly 5th.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
Posted: Mon 28 Jun, 2021 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you Alex. Yes it helps.
|
|
|
|
Paul Hansen
|
|
|
|
Len Parker
|
|
|
|
|