[Kertész Miklós József]

Dear armour community,

I have read in certain sources, that the armour of Henry the VIII from 1540 has a certain ventral plate or inner breastplate. The sources state that the function of this device is the distribution of the weight of the breast an backplate and the arm protection on the entire upper body.
So far I could not find out anything about the appearance of this inner breastplate. Does anybody have a photo of the device or some additional information on how this ventral plate looks like?

Sources:
http://www.royalarmouries.org/line-of-kings/l...object/350
http://www.metmuseum.org/collections/search-the-collections/35775
http://www.metmuseum.org/collections/search-the-collections/35775

Also, any photo of the back of the 1540 armour of Henry VIII is very welcome.

[Shahril Dzulkifli]

Here's Henry VIII's armour from 1540. The only problem is I am not sure where the ventral part is.

[Mart Shearer]

They're scientific descriptors using Latin terms, dorsal (L. dorsum) is the backbone side while ventral (L. venter) is the belly side. In the case of humans, the ventral side is the front and dorsal is back, while on cattle ventral is down and dorsal is up.

[Chad Arnow]

Here's a picture of the plate and a drawing of its use from "The Armour & Arms of Henry VIII" by Thom Richardson.

[Kertész Miklós József]

Thank you good sir! This was very helpful indeed!

[Raman A]

[Pat Kilbane]

It's very clever to distribute the weight to the hips like that. I wonder if it interfered with breathing at all to be strapped in around the ribs.

[Mark Griffin]

the fact that its a very rare bit of armour and never caught on leads me to think it wasn't worth having. We talked about replicating it once at the Tower as a handling object but decided there were much better items about than a souped up military tea tray.

[Jeffrey Faulk]

It strikes me as being basically equivalent to wearing two bulletproof vests on top of each other-- if the external plates fail, you still have one behind those to protect your middle. A King is much less easily replaced than a few pieces of armour, especially one with such issues with succession as Henry 8th had... wonder if it was his idea or his counselors'?

[Kertész Miklós József]

As far as I know the main purpose of the ventral plate was not defence. If you look closely at the inner breastplate and the breastplate of the armour in question they both have a hole in the middle. As the sources state there was originally a rather large bolt that gone through both of these holes so the weight of the breast and back plate, the arm protection and the pauldrons was not carried by the shoulders but the waist. The whole inner breastplate functioned like a modern backpacking backpack. This sound very comfortable to me.

[Felix Kunze]

The piece was on display in the Tower about eight years ago. Here is a photo with a reconstruction from a slightly different angle than the picture already posted in the thread.

[Kertész Miklós József]

I do not know if the sketch at the bottom of the picture is valid but it seems to me that the back plate also had a central bolt. Does anybody have a picture of the back of the armour?

[Michael Harley]

Here you go, © Board of Trustees of the Armouries.

[Eric S]

[Nat Lamb]

I do like the pinwheel on his left wrist, makes the whole harness look much more festive.

[Lafayette C Curtis]

What puzzles me is the fact that the ventral plate was deemed necessary at all. A cuirass with a good arming garment underneath should already work quite well at distributing the weight of the entire harness between the shoulders and the hips. Could it have anything to do with Henry's expanding girth, which might have made it difficult to shape the armour so that it would partially rest on his hips rather than entirely on the shoulders? Or is it more about the heavier nature of 16th-century defences compared to their 15th century ancestors (as Gordon Frye experienced here)?

[Robert MacPherson]

[Robert MacPherson]

[Robert MacPherson]

.... no. That armor has no hole in the backplate

Here's a link to a PDF of the monograph.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&...9033,d.b2U

Mac

[Robert MacPherson]

I believe that the major benefit and purpose of the "ventral plate" is to provide an convenient anchor for the sholder straps of the backplate. In both of the surviving armors where it is employed, the gorget is external, and thus put on after the breast and back.

The arming sequence would be like this...

--strap on the "ventral plate" assembly.
--squeeze into the backplate
--strap the backplate to the "ventral plate" assembly.
--offer the breastplate up to the bolt on the "ventral plate" assembly.
--secure the breast with a nut.
--put on the gorget
--secure the gorget to the breast and back

The result is that the shoulder- weight of the armor is not on the gorget like you would expect, but rather on the internal shoulderstraps which run from the backplate to the "ventral plate" assembly.

All armor places some weight on the hips, and these armors are no exception. It is important to note that these armors have their waist lames attached with internal leathers which allow a certain amount of telescopic collapse. At most, the hips will carry the weight of the waist lames and the skirts.

On the grand scale of things, I think we have to conclude that the whole "ventral plate" thing was not worth the fuss. They were only ever made at Greenwich, and then only for a few years. Henry VIII must have liked them OK, but then again he liked high tech military toys. The gun-shields did not exactly catch on either.

Mac