Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Two-handed poleaxe from the British Museum Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page 1, 2  Next 
Author Message
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin


myArmoury Admin

PostPosted: Fri 25 Aug, 2006 5:44 pm    Post subject: Two-handed poleaxe from the British Museum         Reply with quote

This was posted by William M in another topic. I've split it into its own.



It is a two-handed pole-axe from the British Museum.

The museum card says this:

Steel two-handed poll-axe, the quillon block engraved with the arms of the Commonwealth
English, about 1619-53

Here is a photo I took of it last year:

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Shawn Henthorn




Location: Amarillo TX
Joined: 25 May 2006
Reading list: 5 books

Posts: 144

PostPosted: Fri 25 Aug, 2006 5:44 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

WTF?! It looks like a really demented Tuck
View user's profile Send private message
Keith Culbertson




Location: Columbus, OH
Joined: 09 Aug 2006

Posts: 4

PostPosted: Sat 26 Aug, 2006 9:52 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I really like this very interesting warhammer---but do you recall its date? Has anyone ever seen it reproduced, or anything like it?
Keith
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Steve Grisetti




Location: Orlando metro area, Florida, USA
Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Likes: 9 pages
Reading list: 28 books

Posts: 1,812

PostPosted: Sat 26 Aug, 2006 10:04 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Shawn Henthorn wrote:
... It looks like a really demented Tuck
Actually, I think it is a neat idea, so maybe that makes me demented Big Grin . But point control when you use it as a tuck might be a little more difficult with all of that mass out near the tip.
"...dismount thy tuck, be yare in thy preparation, for thy assailant is quick, skilful, and deadly."
- Sir Toby Belch
View user's profile Send private message
Alex Oster




Location: Washington and Yokohama
Joined: 01 Mar 2004

Posts: 410

PostPosted: Sat 26 Aug, 2006 1:11 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

It really looks like a civilian remount from battlefield debris.




The size dosen't seem long enough for a pole axe, but maybe as a tourney/joust weapon? I could see it as a that more.

The pen is mightier than the sword, especially since it can get past security and be stabbed it into a jugular.
This site would be better if everytime I clicked submit... I got to hear a whip crack!
My collection: Various Blades & Conan related
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Michael R. Black





Joined: 24 Aug 2003
Likes: 1 page

Posts: 180

PostPosted: Sat 26 Aug, 2006 3:22 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I can get some idea of size by the other items in the picture, but I'd be curious to know it's exact dimensions.

Michael
View user's profile Send private message
Sean Flynt




Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Likes: 10 pages
Reading list: 13 books

Spotlight topics: 7
Posts: 5,981

PostPosted: Mon 28 Aug, 2006 7:25 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Is that a tube welded to the blade? If it's for a panache, this might be some sort of odd bearing sword.
-Sean

Author of the Little Hammer novel

https://www.amazon.com/Little-Hammer-Sean-Flynt/dp/B08XN7HZ82/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=little+hammer+book&qid=1627482034&sr=8-1
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Russ Ellis
Industry Professional




Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Reading list: 42 books

Posts: 2,608

PostPosted: Mon 28 Aug, 2006 11:09 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

There's always something new isn't there? It seems like this thing ought to be called a two handed hammer or something though, since I do not see an axe head there at all...
TRITONWORKS Custom Scabbards
View user's profile Send private message
Sean Flynt




Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Likes: 10 pages
Reading list: 13 books

Spotlight topics: 7
Posts: 5,981

PostPosted: Mon 28 Aug, 2006 11:38 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

The length and shape of the hammer has me wondering if this is a one-of-a-kind cavalry weapon from the late 16th c. The Commonwealth mark and "panache holder" could have been added later as the weapon proved ineffecient or obsolete for field use. It would make an impressive bearing weapon.
-Sean

Author of the Little Hammer novel

https://www.amazon.com/Little-Hammer-Sean-Flynt/dp/B08XN7HZ82/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=little+hammer+book&qid=1627482034&sr=8-1
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin


myArmoury Admin

PostPosted: Mon 28 Aug, 2006 12:57 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Russ Ellis wrote:
There's always something new isn't there? It seems like this thing ought to be called a two handed hammer or something though, since I do not see an axe head there at all...


Poleaxes don't always have axe heads. In fact, most do not.

.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Russ Ellis
Industry Professional




Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Reading list: 42 books

Posts: 2,608

PostPosted: Mon 28 Aug, 2006 1:58 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Nathan Robinson wrote:

Poleaxes don't always have axe heads. In fact, most do not.


Really? I'd always thought a pole axe was a rather specific configuration. That is an axe head, a back spike or hammer and usually a top spike. A polehammer on the other hand would be something with a back spike, a hammer face and perhaps a top spike. Interesting. I will consult Waldman and see what he has to say on the subject as well as Oakeshott...

For the moment:

Poleaxe, pollaxe, polaxe: "A knightly staff weapon, its head being an axehead, usually balanced by a hammerhead, and surmounted by a steel spike. The shaft was protected by steel checks and the hand by a steel rondel. Used from the fifteenth century for foot combats and for war. The component 'pole' in the name refers not to the staff, but to the Old English word 'head.'"-David Edge and John Miles Paddock, Arms and Armour of the Medieval Knight.

Which seems reasonable since one would expect his axe to be an axe... Happy

Of course the definitions of any and all pole arms have always been a bit fluid I suppose. Do a lot of you all see a poll axe as often not having an axe blade?

TRITONWORKS Custom Scabbards
View user's profile Send private message
Russ Ellis
Industry Professional




Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Reading list: 42 books

Posts: 2,608

PostPosted: Mon 28 Aug, 2006 2:16 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hmm a little more online looking and I find Henry the VIIIs pollaxe armor supposedly displayed with a pollaxe...



Which I would have called a bec de corbyn.... curiouser and curiouser... it may be that I am merely a victim of our ancestors not bothering to get really very specific about things. A modern habit perhaps...

TRITONWORKS Custom Scabbards
View user's profile Send private message
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin


myArmoury Admin

PostPosted: Mon 28 Aug, 2006 2:20 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

A bec de corbyn is a form of poleaxe. I'll dig up further detailed info for you in about a week.
.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Russ Ellis
Industry Professional




Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Reading list: 42 books

Posts: 2,608

PostPosted: Mon 28 Aug, 2006 2:23 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Nathan Robinson wrote:
A bec de corbyn is a form of poleaxe. I'll dig up further detailed info for you in about a week.


<thumb up> Cool Nathan thanks!

TRITONWORKS Custom Scabbards
View user's profile Send private message
Fabrice Cognot
Industry Professional



Location: Dijon
Joined: 29 Sep 2004

Posts: 354

PostPosted: Tue 29 Aug, 2006 4:20 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I lectured last October for the second IAAC in Vienna about the history of the poleaxe.

And I must say Nate is right Happy

Even in the Burgundian treatise Le Jeu de la Hache, the weapon used has a hammer head, back spike (called bec de faucon) and top spike. Also, in the earlier Fior di Battaglia by Fiore dei Liberi, his Azza is of the same type. In Talhoffer too...

Same again, nearly all the poleaxes mentionned in the various Pas d'Armes that took place in Burgundy in the XVth century were of the 'hammer' type.


Fab

PhD in medieval archeology.
HEMAC member
De Taille et d'Estoc director
Maker of high quality historical-inspired pieces.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Chuck Wyatt





Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 62

PostPosted: Tue 29 Aug, 2006 7:17 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I saw something very similar at the Tower of London a couple of years ago.
Sadly no description was next to it.

[url]http://home.comcast.net/~c-wyatt/fullhammer.jpg [/url]

[url]http://home.comcast.net/~c-wyatt/hammerhead.jpg[/url]
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
George Hill




Location: Atlanta Ga
Joined: 16 May 2005

Posts: 614

PostPosted: Sat 02 Sep, 2006 6:55 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Russ Ellis wrote:
Nathan Robinson wrote:

Poleaxes don't always have axe heads. In fact, most do not.


Poleaxe, pollaxe, polaxe: "A knightly staff weapon, its head being an axehead, usually balanced by a hammerhead, and surmounted by a steel spike. The shaft was protected by steel checks and the hand by a steel rondel. Used from the fifteenth century for foot combats and for war. The component 'pole' in the name refers not to the staff, but to the Old English word 'head.'"-David Edge and John Miles Paddock, Arms and Armour of the Medieval Knight.

Which seems reasonable since one would expect his axe to be an axe... Happy


Russ, the correct term isn't pole axe. It's Pollax, which isn't english and roughy translates as 'head crusher' or some such. (Can someone here give us a better translation?)

But as we so often do, we have modified the term to modern english, 'pole axe' since that does describe what many of them were. The term pole axe is a good term, but we should know the root isn't the same term.

To abandon your shield is the basest of crimes. - --Tacitus on Germania
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Al Muckart




Location: NZ
Joined: 27 Dec 2005

Posts: 309

PostPosted: Sat 02 Sep, 2006 3:35 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

George Hill wrote:

Russ, the correct term isn't pole axe. It's Pollax, which isn't english and roughy translates as 'head crusher' or some such. (Can someone here give us a better translation?)

But as we so often do, we have modified the term to modern english, 'pole axe' since that does describe what many of them were. The term pole axe is a good term, but we should know the
root isn't the same term.


Fascinating. Do you know which language pollax comes from?

--
Al.
http://wherearetheelves.net
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Geoff Wood




Location: UK
Joined: 31 Aug 2003

Posts: 634

PostPosted: Sat 02 Sep, 2006 4:19 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Poll is english for head, as in poll tax, redpoll, polling etc.. Ax is english for axe (or a metathesis for ask, but the former version seems more probable in this context). As for not having an axe blade as we conventionally recognise it now, neither does a dagger axe. Maybe it was some reference to a 'nasty bit that you use at right angles to the shaft', or maybe they all started with axe heads and the name stuck when the blade didn't. We still call people plumbers, though copper and plastic have long since replaced lead.
Geoff

Edit: and then there's the pickaxe ............
View user's profile Send private message
George Hill




Location: Atlanta Ga
Joined: 16 May 2005

Posts: 614

PostPosted: Sat 02 Sep, 2006 9:28 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Al Muckart wrote:
George Hill wrote:

Russ, the correct term isn't pole axe. It's Pollax, which isn't english and roughy translates as 'head crusher' or some such. (Can someone here give us a better translation?)

But as we so often do, we have modified the term to modern english, 'pole axe' since that does describe what many of them were. The term pole axe is a good term, but we should know the
root isn't the same term.


Fascinating. Do you know which language pollax comes from?


Er, Strike that, it is English, but it's old or middle Engish, which isn't like modern English.

Bear in mind that "ye olde whatevere" isn't old, but middle English. Middle is much MUCH closer then old.

To abandon your shield is the basest of crimes. - --Tacitus on Germania
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Two-handed poleaxe from the British Museum
Page 1 of 2 Reply to topic
Go to page 1, 2  Next All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum