Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > That's not rapier, is it? Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Kerim Mamedov




Location: Poland
Joined: 21 Mar 2007

Posts: 53

PostPosted: Thu 05 Apr, 2007 6:02 am    Post subject: That's not rapier, is it?         Reply with quote

Thinking about buying this sword, (though it's not oriental one Happy )
Seller say it's rapier, but I didn't think so, while it looks great.
probably every one here now what sword it is, right? Happy



 Attachment: 101.38 KB
rapier2.jpg.jpg

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kerim Mamedov




Location: Poland
Joined: 21 Mar 2007

Posts: 53

PostPosted: Thu 05 Apr, 2007 6:06 am    Post subject: Re: That's not rapier, is it?         Reply with quote

some signs on a blade


 Attachment: 115.2 KB
rapier.jpg.jpg

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Alex Oster




Location: Washington and Yokohama
Joined: 01 Mar 2004

Posts: 410

PostPosted: Thu 05 Apr, 2007 6:37 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Pretty sure thats a classic "dress saber" as they seem to be called around my way.
Pretty hilt though. Too bad its not on a fuller battle worthy blade.

The pen is mightier than the sword, especially since it can get past security and be stabbed it into a jugular.
This site would be better if everytime I clicked submit... I got to hear a whip crack!
My collection: Various Blades & Conan related
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Robin Smith




Location: Louisiana
Joined: 23 Dec 2006
Likes: 4 pages
Reading list: 17 books

Posts: 746

PostPosted: Thu 05 Apr, 2007 6:39 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I'm no expert, but its certainly not a rapier. It looks like a military dress sword (...no kidding... maybe the army and navy coop thing tipped me off Wink Not trying to be snarky.... ) Seriously though, if this guy is trying to pass that off as a rapier don't buy it (I mean, you can buy it, just don't buy the story that its a rapier...)
A furore Normannorum libera nos, Domine
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Jonathan Hopkins




PostPosted: Thu 05 Apr, 2007 7:59 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

That is a British Pattern 1897 infantry officer's sword. The cypher on the blade and guard is that of George V (1910-1936). According to Bezdek's Swords and Sword Makers of England and Scotland, the Army and Navy Cooperative Society was in business at 105 Victoria Street between 1890 and 1934. So the approximate timeframe for this sword would be between 1910-1934. The Army and Navy Cooperative Society was an outfitter, so the sword was likely made by another firm.

As to this sword's use, it was not just a dress sword. The blade was introduced in 1892 and was mated with the 1854 Pattern "gothic" hilt. The hilt was not satisfactory and was later replaced with a steel three-quarter basket hilt in 1895. In 1897, the inboard side of the guard was turned down (towards the blade end) to prevent fraying of uniforms. Robson cites an article from the Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research from 1934 in which a correspondent recalls the that this pattern (1895 Pattern) served him excellently in hand-to-hand-fighting against the Dervishes in the Sudan, in a way that its predecessor could not have done. This sword came in two forms; a more robust service blade and a lighter 'piquet' or 'levee' blade. The blade has a broad fuller that runs about half of the length of the blade. The blade is unsharpened for about 2/3 of its length, resulting in a blade that has a dumbbell cross section. The blade is meant to be a lethal thrusting weapon. There are extensive discussions of this Pattern over on the Anitique and Military sub-forum of www.swordforum.com.

So while many iterations of this Pattern probably did end up only being used for dress purposes (it is today--the 1897 is still currently used today), it was designed as a fighting weapon.

Jonathan
View user's profile Send private message
GG Osborne





Joined: 21 Mar 2006

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 487

PostPosted: Thu 05 Apr, 2007 8:54 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I believe the Star of David indicates a blade by Wilkinson. The entire sword may be a Wilkinson contract sword for the military outfitters mentioned above.
"Those who live by the sword...will usually die with a huge, unpaid credit card balance!"
View user's profile Send private message
Sam Barris




Location: San Diego, California
Joined: 29 Apr 2004
Likes: 4 pages

Posts: 630

PostPosted: Thu 05 Apr, 2007 9:03 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

It may be a Wilkinson, but not because of the star. Everyone uses that, even to this day. Wilkinson actually discontinued their use of it because it was so widely used.
Pax,
Sam Barris

"Any nation that draws too great a distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards, and its fighting done by fools." —Thucydides
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Kerim Mamedov




Location: Poland
Joined: 21 Mar 2007

Posts: 53

PostPosted: Thu 05 Apr, 2007 10:10 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thanks a lot!
I was walking in darknes, now my eyes are open and I see things in day light Happy
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > That's not rapier, is it?
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum