
| myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term. Last 10 Donors: Piotr H. Feret, Graham Shearlaw, Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary (View All Donors) |
| Author |
Message |
Jared Smith

|
Posted: Tue 25 May, 2010 7:09 pm Post subject: earliest use of phrase "hand and a half" |
|
|
In the interest of possibly knowing the origin of what might be a modern term "hand and a half sword", I am wondering how early such a phrase existed in historical manuscripts? I could care less if the actual historical subject is factually known to have measured only 1" in length, or if it spanned a continent. I just want to know about the historical authenticity and earliest dated use of the literal phrase "hand and a half" with respect to swords.
Absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence!
|
|
|
 |
Vincent Le Chevalier

|
Posted: Thu 27 May, 2010 7:02 am Post subject: Re: earliest use of phrase "hand and a half" |
|
|
| Jared Smith wrote: | | In the interest of possibly knowing the origin of what might be a modern term "hand and a half sword", I am wondering how early such a phrase existed in historical manuscripts? I could care less if the actual historical subject is factually known to have measured only 1" in length, or if it spanned a continent. I just want to know about the historical authenticity and earliest dated use of the literal phrase "hand and a half" with respect to swords. |
I don't know the earliest use but the phrase is used in Lovino's manuscript c. 1580: "spada di una mano e meza". It is used to distinguish it from the true two-handed sword which has a longer blade and handle, just like we do today.
I guess the need for the distinction only became apparent when the bigger swords appeared...
Regards,
--
Vincent
Ensis Sub Caelo
|
|
|
 |
Thom R.

|
Posted: Thu 27 May, 2010 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
We talked about this in 07 if I recall, because I bookmarked a page from ARMA that I thought you had pointed us to on the discussion of "Epee Batarde" The ARMA page states a Spanish reference slightly earlier than Vincent's
D. Enrique de Leguina gives a 1564 reference to una espada estoque de mano y media,
However there is a logical inconsistency here in my way of thinking since we do have several references to epée a deux mains and spada da due mani from early 1400s and I would think if you are going to use a term like "two hand sword" its not that illogical to consider that you might call another sword a "hand and a half" sword. I dunno its a good question................. that might not be answered solely through examination of weapon treatises but rather this is where we need our scholars like Dr Moffett who have read a lot of other types of period documents, wills, court documents etc, to help us
tr
|
|
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2026 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|