Author |
Message |
Jared Smith
|
Posted: Tue 25 May, 2010 8:09 pm Post subject: earliest use of phrase "hand and a half" |
|
|
In the interest of possibly knowing the origin of what might be a modern term "hand and a half sword", I am wondering how early such a phrase existed in historical manuscripts? I could care less if the actual historical subject is factually known to have measured only 1" in length, or if it spanned a continent. I just want to know about the historical authenticity and earliest dated use of the literal phrase "hand and a half" with respect to swords.
Absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence!
|
|
|
|
Vincent Le Chevalier
|
Posted: Thu 27 May, 2010 8:02 am Post subject: Re: earliest use of phrase "hand and a half" |
|
|
Jared Smith wrote: | In the interest of possibly knowing the origin of what might be a modern term "hand and a half sword", I am wondering how early such a phrase existed in historical manuscripts? I could care less if the actual historical subject is factually known to have measured only 1" in length, or if it spanned a continent. I just want to know about the historical authenticity and earliest dated use of the literal phrase "hand and a half" with respect to swords. |
I don't know the earliest use but the phrase is used in Lovino's manuscript c. 1580: "spada di una mano e meza". It is used to distinguish it from the true two-handed sword which has a longer blade and handle, just like we do today.
I guess the need for the distinction only became apparent when the bigger swords appeared...
Regards,
--
Vincent
Ensis Sub Caelo
|
|
|
|
Thom R.
|
Posted: Thu 27 May, 2010 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
We talked about this in 07 if I recall, because I bookmarked a page from ARMA that I thought you had pointed us to on the discussion of "Epee Batarde" The ARMA page states a Spanish reference slightly earlier than Vincent's
D. Enrique de Leguina gives a 1564 reference to una espada estoque de mano y media,
However there is a logical inconsistency here in my way of thinking since we do have several references to epée a deux mains and spada da due mani from early 1400s and I would think if you are going to use a term like "two hand sword" its not that illogical to consider that you might call another sword a "hand and a half" sword. I dunno its a good question................. that might not be answered solely through examination of weapon treatises but rather this is where we need our scholars like Dr Moffett who have read a lot of other types of period documents, wills, court documents etc, to help us
tr
|
|
|
|
|