Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > The European Knight vs. The Japanese Samurai Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next 
Author Message
Justin Pasternak




Location: West Springfield, Massachusetts
Joined: 17 Sep 2006

Posts: 174

PostPosted: Fri 20 Oct, 2006 7:36 am    Post subject: The European Knight vs. The Japanese Samurai         Reply with quote

In a one-on-one fight Who would win the European Knight vs. the Japanese Samurai, both warriors would be from the 14th Century. Who would win the fight in hand-to-hand combat?
View user's profile Send private message
George Hill




Location: Atlanta Ga
Joined: 16 May 2005

Posts: 614

PostPosted: Fri 20 Oct, 2006 11:00 am    Post subject: Re: The European Knight vs. The Japanese Samurai         Reply with quote

Justin Pasternak wrote:
In a one-on-one fight Who would win the European Knight vs. the Japanese Samurai, both warriors would be from the 14th Century. Who would win the fight in hand-to-hand combat?


NOT AGAIN! NOT AGAIN!!!! PLEASE NO NOT AGAIN!!!! Surprised Surprised Surprised

OK, OK, As always, the Knight would win, because he's just that cool. Wink


Do a search and you'll find this gone over several times.

Why is it always the Samurai? Isn't it time for a Knight Vs Kungfu master, or Knight vs Spartan?

Seriously, this is the most posted thread, even topping "which sword" at times.

To abandon your shield is the basest of crimes. - --Tacitus on Germania
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Mike Arledge




Location: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Reading list: 8 books

Posts: 434

PostPosted: Fri 20 Oct, 2006 11:33 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

that's crazy talk, no one has ever posted something like that....



ummm


I mean, not since yesterday

Mike J Arledge

The Dude Abides
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Fri 20 Oct, 2006 11:41 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Actually, it you guys will read the entire post, you'll see he's asking about hand-to-hand combat not general armed combat (which has been covered ad nauseum).
Happy

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Joe Fults




Location: Midwest
Joined: 02 Sep 2003

Posts: 3,646

PostPosted: Fri 20 Oct, 2006 2:18 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Knight would have bigger thumbs, more reach, would dominate a thumb war.
"The goal shouldn’t be to avoid being evil; it should be to actively do good." - Danah Boyd
View user's profile Send private message
Sam Barris




Location: San Diego, California
Joined: 29 Apr 2004
Likes: 4 pages

Posts: 630

PostPosted: Fri 20 Oct, 2006 8:27 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I'd be willing to bet that the better fighter would win, if we facor out dumb luck. Who the better fighter might be would be determined by a dizzying array of factors including level of training, reflexes, athletic ability, conditioning, fighting style, weather, time of day, phase of the moon, etc. We're not dealing with video game enemies where every example of a type possesses the same abilities and number of hit points. These are human beings who have the same range of talents and liabilities that modern humans do. It is impossible to draw such general conclusions about such a large and diverse group.

And if you noticed the small degree of frusteration around here, just know that this question is brought up a lot. Wink

Pax,
Sam Barris

"Any nation that draws too great a distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards, and its fighting done by fools." —Thucydides
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
George Hill




Location: Atlanta Ga
Joined: 16 May 2005

Posts: 614

PostPosted: Fri 20 Oct, 2006 8:55 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Joe Fults wrote:
Knight would have bigger thumbs, more reach, would dominate a thumb war.


"But when the Samurai dropped his sword and said, "one... two....three.... four.... I-de-clare-a-thumb-war" The Knight KNEW he had him.

How do you say "I declare a thumb war" in Japanese?

To abandon your shield is the basest of crimes. - --Tacitus on Germania
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin


myArmoury Admin

PostPosted: Fri 20 Oct, 2006 9:11 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

If you guys insist on discussing this type of fantasy topic, I ask that you keep the tone and level of discussion up to the expectations of this site.

Thank you.

.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Nick Trueman





Joined: 27 Mar 2006

Posts: 246

PostPosted: Sat 21 Oct, 2006 8:44 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hey

The Russian in the T-34 tank would win?

N
View user's profile Send private message
Torsten F.H. Wilke




Location: Irvine Spectrum, CA
Joined: 01 Jul 2006

Posts: 250

PostPosted: Sat 21 Oct, 2006 9:20 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Nathan, maybe a new forum category could be created for the excessively fun, crazy/ridiculous, and nonsensical discussions brought up on occasion. A title like "Really Off-Topic Talk" or "Fantasy Forum" might describe that well. Or maybe not... Happy
View user's profile Send private message
Allen G.





Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Reading list: 9 books

Posts: 28

PostPosted: Sat 21 Oct, 2006 9:33 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Assuming you don't mean hand to hand literally; You didnt say what armour theyre wearing, what weapon theyre using. Is the Samurai trying to cut through plate or heavy mail armour with a curved sword? If youre going to make this thread over and over on every history related forum I can think of at least be sepcific..

I don't carry any authority here or know the moderation policies but is there any chance of samurai VS "______" threads just being locked up? Theres 2 on the front page alone.. neither with any real answers. it really takes away from the clean, professional environment of this site.
View user's profile Send private message
Sam Barris




Location: San Diego, California
Joined: 29 Apr 2004
Likes: 4 pages

Posts: 630

PostPosted: Sat 21 Oct, 2006 10:41 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I tend to agree. In most cases, the intellectual level of "Warrior X vs. Warrior Y" topics tends to fall in the vicinity of abysmal. They're fun to have sometimes, but little good ever comes of them. I've always enjoyed the more academic atmosphere found here. There is already a nice fantasy forum over at SFI, for those time you simply must discuss an aspect of Squall's gunblade or a Klingon bat'leth, so the inclusion of one here seems somewhat redundant.
Pax,
Sam Barris

"Any nation that draws too great a distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards, and its fighting done by fools." —Thucydides
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Sat 21 Oct, 2006 10:58 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I don't see a new forum being added for the purpose of these kind of threads.

Also, our policy is not to lock threads. This happens on other boards and often creates more problems than it solves. Generall, it's often preferable to trash a thread rather than lock it: if it has no value and has spiraled out of control, leaving it locked but visible serves no purpose. Will we begin to automatically trash threads of this nature? Not likely.

These threads can have some educational value to some people, but many jaded readers post unhelpful, snotty, and downright degrading messages in response since they are tired of these threads. Evidently, the poster of such threads is curious about these topics and obviously hasn't seen the myriad of other threads that are out there. There are things that can be learned from good responses to these threads, such as why it's nearly impossible to make valid, apples-to-apples comparisons of weapons, warriors, and fighting systems that developed in response to wildly different circumstances and materials.

If people would either a) take the time to respond helpfully and thoughtfully or would b) not post in them if they have nothing good to say, these threads would be less painful and more educational.

If you don't find these threads helpful or feel you can't post something of educational value in the tone we have tried very hard to maintain here, then stay out of them. Don't post a snide response or worthlessly facetious response simply because you are tired of these kinds of posts. Add something to a discussion, don't drag it down. If you can't do that, don't hit the reply button.

Happy

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Benjamin H. Abbott




Location: New Mexico
Joined: 28 Feb 2004

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,248

PostPosted: Sat 21 Oct, 2006 5:13 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I'd stay the fight is close to dead even, though a very late 14th-century knight might have somewhat superior armor and polearm better at defeating armor. Even early 14th-century European armor covers the body more completely than Japanese armor, though. So, if they both used swords, I'd give a very slight edge to the European.
View user's profile Send private message
Don Stanko




Location: ohio
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
Likes: 1 page
Reading list: 482 books

Posts: 255

PostPosted: Sat 21 Oct, 2006 8:18 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hello Justin, I believe your question has crossed the minds of many sword enthusiasts. Since the question started out a little vague, it ended up being almost impossible to answer. Maybe you could clarify a bit. Were you wondering which warrior received the greater amount of training in their lifetime? Or maybe which warrior was in the better overall physical condition? Or maybe which culture outfitted their soldiers with the best overall equipment? These questions may be equally as hard/impossible to answer but you might get more postings with solid educated guesses.

Hopefully this helps. Don
View user's profile Send private message
Jean Thibodeau




Location: Montreal,Quebec,Canada
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Likes: 50 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 5
Posts: 8,310

PostPosted: Sat 21 Oct, 2006 9:00 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Who would win is an impossible question to answer and any specific fight like this could end completely differently than any other subsequent fight. So, lets forget about " who would win ".

If a serious discussion is even possible it might be an abstract comparison of techniques: Say Samurai X uses a specific technique, what technique would the differently trained Knight use as a counter ? What techniques would be common and familiar to both and which would surprise the other ?

All this complicated by all the different combinations of styles both Western and Eastern that one could chose to pair up for comparison.

Equipment is also were comparisons can be made, but here too skill in use would be more critical than the details in a real life contest.

All the variable that would apply to a real fight that concern the individual quality of each fighter is just a distraction.

So I think a comparison of techniques might produce some interesting speculations or better simulations of how these would interact. I personally don't have the competence to come to any conclusions as I am not an expert in either Japanese or European swordsmanship.

So, I believe that a serious discussion about this sort of thing is possible it's just that most similar Topics degenerate into
unproductive my opinion is better than your opinion ......... and become obnoxious or boring !

You can easily give up your freedom. You have to fight hard to get it back!
View user's profile Send private message
Sam Barris




Location: San Diego, California
Joined: 29 Apr 2004
Likes: 4 pages

Posts: 630

PostPosted: Sat 21 Oct, 2006 9:58 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Jean Thibodeau wrote:
Say Samurai X uses a specific technique...


Hiten Mitsurugi Ryu?

Sorry! *ducks* Razz

Pax,
Sam Barris

"Any nation that draws too great a distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards, and its fighting done by fools." —Thucydides
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Katie Neal





Joined: 17 Jul 2006

Posts: 38

PostPosted: Sat 21 Oct, 2006 11:21 pm    Post subject: i like these things.         Reply with quote

Hi gents. i kinda like these decussions, allthough only hyperthetical, when taken seriously these threads have a great opitunity to compare armour and skill from different culture and pit them against another.

i think that a knight would win.

whether on horse back or foot.
View user's profile Send private message
Torsten F.H. Wilke




Location: Irvine Spectrum, CA
Joined: 01 Jul 2006

Posts: 250

PostPosted: Sun 22 Oct, 2006 11:13 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hey, why don't we try some generalizations? The European warrior will most likely have been larger and stronger than the Japanese warrior. That gives the Knight some advantage in the "brute" department. The European warrior's full plate armour would likely have presented the biggest problem in getting a strike through. I'm not trying to imply that the Japanese warrior's armour was any less worthy, just that a combination of coverage and fairly advanced metal working abilities most likely give the European armour an advantage in that department. Please remember that the full plate armour still had many fallable strike areas, especially those of movement. To successfuly render an incapacitating strike against a warrior in full plate, the opposing combatent would have to be extremely precise and quik. Herein lies the crux. Japanese martial training seems to have been very thorough, highly evolved, extremely precise, and a part of a much more encompassing life philosophy, much more so than the European martial training. That would probably give an advantage to the Samurai, under many fight situations. I believe, that it is at this point that the individual warrior's mental and physical capabilities would actually determine the effective outcome. You basically have razor-sharp skills vs. power& protection. That is tough to call... who would fall for what, first?


P.s. ; Didn't we all have to start learning from more knowledgable people at some point in time? I include myself in the learning group...
View user's profile Send private message
Benjamin H. Abbott




Location: New Mexico
Joined: 28 Feb 2004

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,248

PostPosted: Mon 23 Oct, 2006 10:12 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Quote:
Japanese martial training seems to have been very thorough, highly evolved, extremely precise, and a part of a much more encompassing life philosophy, much more so than the European martial training. That would probably give an advantage to the Samurai, under many fight situations.


I completely disagree. Both Samurai and knights trained rigorously in effective martial art systems. Giving either side any advantage in skill is misguided.
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > The European Knight vs. The Japanese Samurai
Page 1 of 5 Reply to topic
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum