Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Shields - What do you prefer? Do you have a favourite? Reply to topic
This is a Spotlight Topic Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next 
Author Message
William Carew




Location: Australia
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 154

PostPosted: Sat 15 Oct, 2005 3:39 pm    Post subject: Shields - What do you prefer? Do you have a favourite?         Reply with quote

The shield was, for so much of the Ancient and early to high Middle Ages, an essential item of war gear, and the form, function and decoration of a shield can tell a good deal about the culture that produced it. Despite that, the importance of (and effectiveness of) shields seems to be largely overlooked in modern film, media and print. I think it is a shame.

For me, the 11th to 12th century teardrop (aka Norman / Kite / Almond shaped) shield is the one. My interest in the period plays a large part, but I also think it is close to an ideal blend of form and function, ideal for both the heavy horseman and heavy footman.

Enclosed are pictures of a late 11th/ early 12th century Italo-Norman teardrop, with the slightly unusual feature of steel reenforcement straps riveted to the front (an interpretation based on several items of iconography). I made the shield blank and another chap finished it. It is a solid and quite heavy piece of gear, but I am sure it would prove it's worth in the front line of a battle.

So, what shield forms do you have an interest in? What do you prefer? What would you want to take into battle? Anyone else have pictures of any of their shields?

Cheers,



 Attachment: 40.35 KB
_shieldfront.jpg


Bill Carew
Jogo do Pau Brisbane
COLLEGIUM IN ARMIS


Last edited by William Carew on Sat 15 Oct, 2005 3:41 pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
William Carew




Location: Australia
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 154

PostPosted: Sat 15 Oct, 2005 3:40 pm    Post subject: Rear of the shield         Reply with quote

Showing a period enarme arrangement.


 Attachment: 38.32 KB
_shieldback.jpg


Bill Carew
Jogo do Pau Brisbane
COLLEGIUM IN ARMIS
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jonathan Blair




Location: Hanover, PA
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Likes: 9 pages
Reading list: 2 books

Posts: 496

PostPosted: Sat 15 Oct, 2005 4:13 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I'm a heater shield type of guy myself. I don't have any pictures handy of mine, but it is the MRL large heater shield, painted argent with a saltire cross sable nine lozenges argent. I put grey felt on the back for comfort.
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword." - The Lord Jesus Christ, from The Gospel According to Saint Matthew, chapter x, verse 34, Authorized Version of 1611
View user's profile Send private message
Jean Thibodeau




Location: Montreal,Quebec,Canada
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Likes: 50 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 5
Posts: 8,310

PostPosted: Sat 15 Oct, 2005 5:32 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

William;

Don't have any yet except for a Buckler that seems like a good thing to have as backup equipment on your belt even if your primary weapon is a Polearm or Two-handed sword or a projectile weapon. ( The default shield if a bigger shield is not being used. )

The large kite shields really appeal to me and I really like the metal bands on the face of yours specifically and in principle: A little well distributed metal should go a long way increasing the service life of a shield before it needs major repair or replacement.

I also like the later flat topped versions with or without a non-functional decorative shield boss: Non-functional in the sense that it doesn't serve to protect a hand grip but might still function when punching with the shield.

The heater shield appeal less to me because I like the Kite shield better: Period compatibility issues mean that the large Kite shields don't belong with later transitional or plate armour.

As a left hander the round shield can be used by either hand without hand grip position issues.

The later 15th / 16th century all steel round shield would be my favourite from a practical perspective any period compatibility issues aside.

You can easily give up your freedom. You have to fight hard to get it back!
View user's profile Send private message
Gregory J. Liebau




Location: Dinuba, CA
Joined: 27 Nov 2004

Posts: 669

PostPosted: Sat 15 Oct, 2005 5:48 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Of the several shield types I've been able to wield with a weapon, whether it was in mock combat with wooden swords or just swinging a real sword of spear by myself with it, I'd have to say I prefer a pelta. More specifically, the "inverted-pelta" shaped shields believed to be used by Late Mycenaeans, which have the cut-out of the circular base at the bottom, rather than the top. I'm currently reconstructing one from planks, although there is no evidence to say whether they were made from wicker or planks, one way or the other... The planks are actually Oak plywood, although I took care to make sure this wasn' t really noticeable by cutting the wood up, and then flipping different pieces over and trading their places to make the planks look random, and also by extending the hide around the edges to hide the construction. It has a cowhide cover glued to the front with tabs pulled over to the backside and glued/stitched down in place. The diameter from one side to the other is 22.5", so the shield is light, even with 1/2 inch thick planks.

It will have three round, semi-spherical bosses, two small and one large. This is a boss setup based loosely on the Kaloriziki finds, although they were conical rather than circular. A supposed large set of pectorals with raised bosses in the center of them were found at the Liatovouni Hill. The "pectorals" are shown here on display:



Dan Howard and myself have speculated that they were merely bosses, rather than part of a "leather corselet." This and the continuing trend in the use of semi-spherical bosses through history serve as enough evidence for me to use them in a "historic" outfit, based much on artistic evidence (which is what we Bronze Age reenactors must survive on, often enough!)

The rim will be about an inch wide, and be flat over the front of the shield, using the Kaloriziki find as supporting evidence.

The shield will have a hoplite-style grip with the forearm holder and the grip, based on a plate in "The Mycenaeans 1650-1100 BC" by Nicolas Grguric. The picture, which is part of a surviving fresco from Pylos, shows a warrior with a small, circular shield with an aspis style grip. I do not know if part of the picture was reconstructed for his arguments sake, but until I can find evidence to disprove the image, I'll rely on it. I've never seen the picture published anywhere else.

It will also have a guige strap, or telamon, attached to it. It will be made from multiple layers of black wool, stitched down the folded side. The strap will be in two pieces, and simply be tied in the front of the body when it's being carried, to allow the user to adjust it appropriately.

I find this style of shield to be the ultimate mix of mobility for myself! I'm a runner, and often find myself jumping about in combat with my friends. The inverted pelta shape allows the shield to be held against the body, but does not impede the movement of the legs at the same time. The telamon allows it to be worn as back protection when not in use, and also to be kept out of the way. The bosses, although no holes will be present, serve as added protection in the area the arm extends over on the shield's backside. The grip allows the light shield to be even more well distributed during combat, and held with a greater firmness.

Cheers!

-Gregory-

(p.s. Sorry if my description was a bit tedious. I like thorough explanations! I've also attached an image of the back of the shield as I have it so far. None of the bosses have been made and the rim not cut out yet. The grip and forearm piece have not been made yet, either. So far the hide is attached to the glued planks, and I need to drill holes around the edges of the hide and stitch it all up!)



 Attachment: 104.52 KB
Mycenaean Shield (1).jpg
Late Mycenaean Shield (1200-1100)

My Flickr Galleries - Travel, Nature & Things
View user's profile Send private message
G. Scott H.




Location: Arizona, USA
Joined: 22 Feb 2005

Posts: 410

PostPosted: Sat 15 Oct, 2005 8:41 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

The kite obviously gives a lot of protection, but the heater (all other things being equal) is a bit more maneuverable. I only have a cheap MRL heater at the moment, but I've tried the kite style before and it definitely gives a real sense of security. For me it's a tie between the two (though, on looks alone, I'd go with the kite). Happy
View user's profile Send private message
Patrick Kelly




Location: Wichita, Kansas
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Reading list: 42 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 5,739

PostPosted: Sat 15 Oct, 2005 8:56 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Big Grin


I like your shield William.

"In valor there is hope.".................. Tacitus
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Cameron A




Location: Australia
Joined: 25 Sep 2005

Posts: 7

PostPosted: Sat 15 Oct, 2005 9:38 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

My personal prefrence is either a good old fashioned Buckler, or a Targe, they just seem to suit the way I fight. and they are usually combined with a sword
View user's profile Send private message
Gregory J. Liebau




Location: Dinuba, CA
Joined: 27 Nov 2004

Posts: 669

PostPosted: Sat 15 Oct, 2005 11:35 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hey Patrick,

Long time, no chat! I'm in envy of your kit, and your shield looks awesome! I've personally quit my Dark Age stuff and sold off what little I had, and am focusing on my Bronze Age and 14th century. But my favorite shield will probably remain the small Mycenaean one. My ultimate goal in the next couple of years is to make a Figure-of-Eight shield, as shown below.

I've seen them reconstructed, and even used on documentaries about the late Bronze Age Achaeans, but no one has ever made one from reed wickerwork with nearly enough curvature. I hope to be one of the first (if not the first!) THAT will give some good protection while allowing a spear to be used quite freely with two hands via the use of a properly suspended telamon.

Cheers!

-Gregory-



 Attachment: 46.82 KB
Picture 003.jpg


My Flickr Galleries - Travel, Nature & Things
View user's profile Send private message
Patrick Kelly




Location: Wichita, Kansas
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Reading list: 42 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 5,739

PostPosted: Sun 16 Oct, 2005 4:53 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hi Gregory, and thanks!

I'm glad you've decided to focus on the Bronze age stuff. We don't have very many people focusing on that period and it deserves more coverage.

"In valor there is hope.".................. Tacitus
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Patrick Kelly




Location: Wichita, Kansas
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Reading list: 42 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 5,739

PostPosted: Sun 16 Oct, 2005 5:01 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

The round Anglo-Saxon/Viking age shield is another favorite of mine.


"In valor there is hope.".................. Tacitus
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Jeff Larsen




Location: Chandler, AZ
Joined: 06 Jan 2004

Posts: 300

PostPosted: Sun 16 Oct, 2005 5:15 am    Post subject: Shields         Reply with quote

Hi,

Besides trying to make my own (and not very good at it), I have found this one that I picked up off of ebay. Very well constructed and wonderful to handle.

Here it is:

Jeff Cool
View user's profile Send private message
C.L. Miller




PostPosted: Sun 16 Oct, 2005 5:32 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote


My personal favorites are the somewhat controversial convex shields depicted in Anglo-Saxon and Carolingian illustrations... there don't seem to be too many people attempting these today but there are a few.
Here's one of them...
Reconstruction as an aid to interpretation

Tim Noyes makes some nice grips, and offers convex shield blanks made from pressed plywood.
Heron Armoury - Shields

And here's an excellent collection of period images, including the ivory shown above which leaves no doubt as to the intended shape...

Convex Shield

I'm hoping to have a go at making one myself this winter, but we'll see how things go.
View user's profile Send private message
Gary Grzybek




Location: Stillwater N.J.
Joined: 25 Aug 2003

Posts: 559

PostPosted: Sun 16 Oct, 2005 5:52 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Don't have much experience with larger ones but I do like the kite shields.

I'm currently training with A&A's English Buckler and it's very effective with side sword work.

Gary Grzybek
ARMA Northern N.J.
www.armastudy.org
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Steve Grisetti




Location: Orlando metro area, Florida, USA
Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Likes: 9 pages
Reading list: 28 books

Posts: 1,812

PostPosted: Sun 16 Oct, 2005 6:42 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Patrick Kelly wrote:
The round Anglo-Saxon/Viking age shield is another favorite of mine....

Your kit, also, Patrick? I like the spectacle helm. And the Jarl. And the shield, for that matter.
View user's profile Send private message
Elling Polden




Location: Bergen, Norway
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Likes: 1 page

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,576

PostPosted: Sun 16 Oct, 2005 9:31 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Bulckers for fun, kite for utility.

The main disadvantage of the Kite is that it's do darned effective that it makes dueling boring and unrealistic. The buckler, however, is a lot more fun to use because it requires speed and skill.

"this [fight] looks curious, almost like a game. See, they are looking around them before they fall, to find a dry spot to fall on, or they are falling on their shields. Can you see blood on their cloths and weapons? No. This must be trickery."
-Reidar Sendeman, from King Sverre's Saga, 1201
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Patrick Kelly




Location: Wichita, Kansas
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Reading list: 42 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 5,739

PostPosted: Sun 16 Oct, 2005 9:51 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Elling Polden wrote:
Bulckers for fun, kite for utility.

The main disadvantage of the Kite is that it's do darned effective that it makes dueling boring and unrealistic. The buckler, however, is a lot more fun to use because it requires speed and skill.


How does the shield's effectiveness make it's use unrealistic?

"In valor there is hope.".................. Tacitus
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Patrick Kelly




Location: Wichita, Kansas
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Reading list: 42 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 5,739

PostPosted: Sun 16 Oct, 2005 9:55 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Steve Grisetti wrote:
Patrick Kelly wrote:
The round Anglo-Saxon/Viking age shield is another favorite of mine....

Your kit, also, Patrick? I like the spectacle helm. And the Jarl. And the shield, for that matter.


Yes it is, and thanks.

The helm and shield were featured in our last update. This was one of the photos I took for Christian Fletcher's last photo contest.

"In valor there is hope.".................. Tacitus
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Elling Polden




Location: Bergen, Norway
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Likes: 1 page

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,576

PostPosted: Sun 16 Oct, 2005 10:27 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Patrick wrote:
How does the shield's effectiveness make it's use unrealistic?


Because, in the light contact, no helmet hits system that we use for skirmish fighting, there are very few ways to get past a kite and deliver a "realistic" blow.
Fighting with there shields would as far as I can see call for a very direct and brutal style, almost like later plate armour fighting; Get in close, push your opponent of balance, pommel him in the face kind of stuff.
Safety concerns have so far kept us from trying to do "propper" fighting with the kites, but the expanded dueling style, with helmet hits, could make kite fighting more interesting, of course.
So it's mainly problem with our rules set. But still fighting with shields is less challenging than fighting with bucklers, and making "good" hits is easier because you don't have crawl around a big shield.

"this [fight] looks curious, almost like a game. See, they are looking around them before they fall, to find a dry spot to fall on, or they are falling on their shields. Can you see blood on their cloths and weapons? No. This must be trickery."
-Reidar Sendeman, from King Sverre's Saga, 1201
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Aaron Schnatterly




Location: New Glarus, WI
Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Reading list: 67 books

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,244

PostPosted: Sun 16 Oct, 2005 10:38 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Since shield style and use is rather period- and style-dependant, sometimes this is chosen for you.

Since my personal favorite is 15th C longsword, I'll have to go with a combination of the following two pics:



Now, I know that has nothing to do with shields, but the effectiveness of the armour combined with the refined schools of swordsmanship made up for it's absence.

All this said, my second favorite period is 11th Century, so I'll go with the Kite shield, as depicted in this snippet of the Bayeux Tapestry:


Most of my stick-jockey days were spent with a heater and 1-handed sword... pics of that are long, long gone, but I still have the spurs... Wink

-Aaron Schnatterly
_______________

Fortior Qui Se Vincit
(He is stronger who conquers himself.)
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Shields - What do you prefer? Do you have a favourite?
Page 1 of 4 Reply to topic
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum