Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search


myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term.
Last 10 Donors: Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors)

Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Odd Cleveland Museum of Art sword Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Thu 03 Feb, 2022 4:19 am    Post subject: Odd Cleveland Museum of Art sword         Reply with quote

I was at the Cleveland Museum of Art yesterday. They have a great collection. One of the items that stood out was a sword dated to the 15th century. It has accession number 1919.69 and you can see the museum's page here:

https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1919.69

What really jumped out is how thin the pommel is when viewed from the side. See my bad phone pics below. Crazy! Anyone know of any other examples that are that thin?



 Attachment: 46.22 KB
IMG-3130.jpg


 Attachment: 136.84 KB
IMG-3131.jpg


 Attachment: 86.84 KB
IMG-3132.jpg


Happy

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Ryan Renfro




Location: Reno, NV
Joined: 27 Dec 2006
Reading list: 5 books

Posts: 119

PostPosted: Thu 03 Feb, 2022 6:37 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

RA IX.950 (the type XIX Alexandria finger ring sword) is quite similar, about 1.5 cm thick at the middle. It's asymmetrically lenticular when viewed from the top and similar to this one when viewed from the side, although it's at least twice as thick at the grip as it is at the peen. The Cleveland example appears quite thin at the grip end as well. I wonder what the original grip looked like to match it as it must have been really thin where it met the pommel.
View user's profile Send private message
Gregg Sobocinski




Location: Michigan
Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Likes: 5 pages
Reading list: 12 books

Posts: 170

PostPosted: Fri 04 Feb, 2022 4:28 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Is it solid? I wonder how much the thin pommel weighs compared to a typical hollow one. Anyone know?
View user's profile Send private message
Eric Sherwin




Location: Texas
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Likes: 1 page

Posts: 31

PostPosted: Tue 22 Feb, 2022 5:53 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I visited the Deutsches Historisches Museum in Berlin several years ago and I remember coming upon a sword with a very similar flat pommel. I was surprised by its thin cross section in relation to its diameter. If I can manage it, I'll download some photos.
View user's profile Send private message
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Tue 22 Feb, 2022 6:28 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Gregg Sobocinski wrote:
Is it solid? I wonder how much the thin pommel weighs compared to a typical hollow one. Anyone know?


Not sure. However, I'm not sure "typical" pommels were hollow. Some were, of course, but I'm not aware of info that says the practice was typical. Do you have any sources I can check out on that?

Happy

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Eric Sherwin




Location: Texas
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Likes: 1 page

Posts: 31

PostPosted: Wed 23 Feb, 2022 12:13 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I finally found the pictures I said I would post. I really enjoyed that museum[/img]


 Attachment: 427.11 KB
IMG_0145.JPG


 Attachment: 442.94 KB
IMG_0156.JPG


 Attachment: 445.18 KB
IMG_0157.JPG

View user's profile Send private message
Gregg Sobocinski




Location: Michigan
Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Likes: 5 pages
Reading list: 12 books

Posts: 170

PostPosted: Wed 23 Feb, 2022 5:02 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

My mistake, Chad. A quick search of the references I ‘remembered’ indicate “many were hollow” and were “more common than we think”, but not necessarily common. I did intend my comment to be specific to the disc pommels, and not pommels in general.

Edit: I found a video from 2017 where Matt Easton says that the “larger globe and disc pommels were often hollow”. I can imagine my brain hyper- focused on that. He offers a wide variety of examples.

While heading down that rabbit hole, I found an excellent article describing how early medieval hollow pommels were made using the lost wax technique. I wonder how easy this method is versus forge welding two halves.
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/668456
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Odd Cleveland Museum of Art sword
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum