| myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term. Last 10 Donors: Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors) |
Author |
Message |
Dan D'Silva
|
Posted: Mon 25 Mar, 2019 3:10 am Post subject: How do they cast hilts for hidden-tang blades? |
|
|
Hi. I have a largely hypothetical project in mind (i.e. I can't afford it yet) and I'd like to know how you'd go about it. I know that in recent centuries and occasionally in ancient times, brass or bronze hilts were cast to fit hidden-tang swords. However, the one time I tried this in foundry class, using the ceramic shell process (watered-down ceramic slurry and aluminum silicate grit), either the shell failed to fill the hole for the tang or it was too thin and delicate, so when the hilt was cast, it was all plugged up with bronze and useless. Did they use a different process entirely, or is there a technique to keep the hole clear that I didn't think of, like casting in two halves and then welding them? I can't imagine they would go through the effort of casting the hilt with no hole and drilling it out.
|
|
|
|
Glen A Cleeton
|
Posted: Mon 25 Mar, 2019 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am not sure which hilts you are regarding but a lot of 18th and 19th century handles and pommels are quite hollow inside. I don't know the processes involved but some show a seam, or sprue. I am sure, no doubt, some were cast directly onto the blade tangs but so many pommels and grips of those latter centuries do seem to have been lost wax or halves?
Cheers
GC
|
|
|
|
Dan D'Silva
|
Posted: Mon 25 Mar, 2019 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks. Yes, I was thinking of things like 18th-century infantry hangers and 19th-century artillery "gladii," but also of some Iron Age bimetallic weapons like Cimmerian swords, anthropomorphic La Tene daggers, etc. and I'm not sure at what point welding became an option.
|
|
|
|
Glen A Cleeton
|
Posted: Mon 25 Mar, 2019 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, my 1833 dated m1832 artillery sword shows an obvious seam and Ames had "improved the casting once done in house, I assume beefing up the bosses that support the pins. The my nco and musician swords in later decades appear to have grips of seamless tubes. Pommels as mentioned, some showing a seam or sprue but quite hollow inside.
The pillow/cushion and urn type pommels of the 18th century similarly hollow and bone or ivory grips often quite hollow as well with plugs at each end that sized to the tangs.
Cheers
GC
|
|
|
|
Glen A Cleeton
|
Posted: Mon 25 Mar, 2019 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A look at that Huse casting of the m1832
|
|
|
|
Dan D'Silva
|
Posted: Tue 26 Mar, 2019 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very informative. Most of the photos I've found of those kind of hilts so far just show them head-on and usually at a much greater distance.
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|