Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > Would iron and steel swords slice bronze age swords and shie Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page Previous  1, 2 
Author Message
Tom King




Location: florida
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Likes: 2 pages

Posts: 429

PostPosted: Tue 29 May, 2018 6:48 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

One thing I don't think has been brought up yet

1.Bronze is cast
2. You can cast bronze at far lower temperatures than it takes to work iron/steel, let alone smelt it.

It is much easier to work bronze into complex shapes like helmets, chest plates, greaves, etc. The complexity of a Bronze age helmet versus an iron age helmet as far a organic shape, overall coverage, and complexity of form can be at least partially attributed to the fact that casting then grinding a corinthian helm you carved from wax is a hell of a lot easier than trying to make the same thing out of iron.

Forges and forging methods were the main limiting factor. It took the better part of 2000 years before the same complexity and things like "Heroic armor" started to reappear.
https://books.google.com/books?id=PteVlrlhy9YC&printsec=frontcover&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false
View user's profile Send private message
Dan Howard




Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
Joined: 08 Dec 2004

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 3,636

PostPosted: Tue 29 May, 2018 10:03 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Tom King wrote:
The complexity of a Bronze age helmet versus an iron age helmet as far a organic shape, overall coverage, and complexity of form can be at least partially attributed to the fact that casting then grinding a corinthian helm you carved from wax is a hell of a lot easier than trying to make the same thing out of iron.


Bronze helmets were not cast and ground. They were raised from flat plate just like iron ones. The main difference is the annealing process.

Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen and Sword Books
View user's profile Send private message
Matthew Amt




Location: Laurel, MD, USA
Joined: 17 Sep 2003

Posts: 1,456

PostPosted: Wed 30 May, 2018 6:48 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Tom King wrote:
One thing I don't think has been brought up yet

1.Bronze is cast


Sure, but bronze sheet items were also common, hammered out from thin cast plates.

Quote:
2. You can cast bronze at far lower temperatures than it takes to work iron/steel, let alone smelt it.


Copper melts at 1084.62 °C, ​1984.32 °F, while the smelting point of iron is about 1250 °C or 2282 °F. So it's only a difference of about 200 degrees. And we know that ancient bloomeries could reach the *melting* point of iron, far higher than its smelting temperature, so generating the needed heat does not seem to have been a problem.

Quote:
It is much easier to work bronze into complex shapes like helmets, chest plates, greaves, etc. The complexity of a Bronze age helmet versus an iron age helmet as far a organic shape, overall coverage, and complexity of form can be at least partially attributed to the fact that casting then grinding a corinthian helm you carved from wax is a hell of a lot easier than trying to make the same thing out of iron.


As Dan has said, bronze helmets and armor were not cast, but hammered out of sheet or thin plate (which was initially cast, yes!). We're still arguing about what sort of "blank" might have been cast for items like the Corinthian helmet, but it's pretty clear that the ancients had no qualms about adding cast-on features such as crest knobs and nasal reinforcements to thin hammered bronze items.

Plus, the warriors of the Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age didn't care about costs! They were RICH, and wanted to show it off. How many millionaires shop around for a cheaper Maserati? High cost was a *benefit*, not a problem.

Quote:
Forges and forging methods were the main limiting factor. It took the better part of 2000 years before the same complexity and things like "Heroic armor" started to reappear.
https://books.google.com/books?id=PteVlrlhy9YC&printsec=frontcover&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false


Well, basically true. The steel artwork of Negroli and other late medieval and Renaissance masters isn't really an issue, here. We do find iron weapons becoming common several centuries before iron armor, apparently because it was difficult to work iron out thin enough for armor. It has to be forged hot, and thinner metal loses heat too quickly. Bronze, on the other hand, has to be hammered while cold, with frequent annealings to prevent cracking. It just took a while to work out the tricks.

Matthew
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > Would iron and steel swords slice bronze age swords and shie
Page 2 of 2 Reply to topic
Go to page Previous  1, 2 All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum