Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search


myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term.
Last 10 Donors: Daniel Sullivan, Anonymous, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors)

Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Maciejowski Bible Axe Construction Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Jonathan Hodge




Location: East Tennessee
Joined: 18 Sep 2015

Posts: 132

PostPosted: Thu 14 Dec, 2017 9:45 am    Post subject: Maciejowski Bible Axe Construction         Reply with quote

I was browsing Kult of Athena’s website recently and saw a new(?) Deepeeka offering called the Reaver Axe. To my eye it matches very closely the style of axe found in the Mac Bible with varying haft lengths. It features a pinned construction where the blade is riveted to the socket. I was under the belief that most period axes featured drifted sockets for various reasons - one of which may have been to eliminate stress on the transition from socket to blade in a striking weapon of this kind...though I imagine that the handle would fail before these large rivets would. Does anyone know of the historical plausibility of construction of this type?


 Attachment: 44.32 KB
E20B5ED0-FBA4-42A0-89E3-97B8DD4AD830.jpeg


 Attachment: 242.29 KB
CA179DB0-7B46-4E32-8AE0-122B23A1E8D4.gif


 Attachment: 221.1 KB
61B37B61-2905-4247-AE5E-8D6980100F59.gif


 Attachment: 370.42 KB
2125398A-E962-4324-AAE0-FC41B7A1A29B.png



Last edited by Jonathan Hodge on Thu 14 Dec, 2017 11:13 am; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Moore




Location: East backwoods-assed Texas
Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Likes: 6 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 2,294

PostPosted: Thu 14 Dec, 2017 11:01 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

That 'pinned-to-the-socket' method could have been for ease and speed of construction. Using the 'drifted' method would probably be stronger, but if you just needed weapons in a hurry..... Worried . Then again, I've never forged an axe. Laughing Out Loud That Reaver does do a passable resemblance. Happy .........McM
''Life is like a box of chocolates...'' --- F. Gump
View user's profile Send private message
Geoffroy Gautier





Joined: 18 Nov 2009

Posts: 28

PostPosted: Fri 15 Dec, 2017 6:40 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

This kind of pinned construction is really an artifact of modern manufacturing methods and modern available raw material. Both the blade and socket are simply cut from a sheet of steel, the eye is rolled, the holes are drilled, and the pins peened. But back in the days, you didn't have pre-made supply of sheet steel, you didn't have very efficient drill bits, drill presses or electric hand drills, while on the other hand everything required to be forged in the first place as the only material available came in inconsistent lumps, and forge-welding was a technique every blacksmith had no choice but to master.

Even during the times of direst needs, for example around 1793-94, when the young republican French army was fighting royal powers of Europe, forges were set all around Paris to forge pikes, as there was way too few muskets being produced to equip all troops and militias. And these pike heads, while simplified in design for mass production, had forged sockets and forged blades, and basically every blacksmith apprentice was supposed to be able to make one, and sometimes even people without any previous forging experience. I know it's centuries after the Maciejowky's Bible, but there hadn't been any significant technological leap in forging methods.

I don't mean to say that the kind of axe Deepeeka offers is total ahistorical and was never made, but it wouldn't have been any more convenient than a more conventional method (punched through and drifted, or folded over and forge-welded, which are the two main methods). The Deepeeka axe has the same silhouette, but it's not at all a reconstruction of these axes.
View user's profile Send private message
Timo Nieminen




Location: Brisbane, Australia
Joined: 08 May 2009
Likes: 1 page
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 1,504

PostPosted: Fri 15 Dec, 2017 5:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Maciejowski Bible Axe Construction         Reply with quote

Jonathan Hodge wrote:
To my eye it matches very closely the style of axe found in the Mac Bible with varying haft lengths.


The axes you show in art just look like decorated axes. I don't think the markings say anything about the method of construction.

Lines and various circles, dots, etc. are common:



There are axes where the eye is made from a flat piece rolled around and welded to the blade. Sometimes, it is forged as one piece with the blade (and therefore welded on only one side) and sometimes it's a separate piece (and welded on both sides). Most of the examples of this I've seen have been Indian. I don't know of any European axes like this, but Waldman, "Hafted Weapons ..." has examples of halberds with eyes done in both ways.

There are some riveted-blade axes:

where riveting might be used as an easier alternative to welding wootz to wrought iron.

"In addition to being efficient, all pole arms were quite nice to look at." - Cherney Berg, A hideous history of weapons, Collier 1963.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jonathan Hodge




Location: East Tennessee
Joined: 18 Sep 2015

Posts: 132

PostPosted: Fri 15 Dec, 2017 6:51 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thanks Timo. I was interested to see that there was a Deepeeka axe of very similar shape to the Mac Bible axes - not suggesting they were riveted, but was curious to see if riveted axe construction of some kind was ever used in the way seen in the modern repro. Thanks for sharing your sources! Out of curiosity, do you have any info on the second axe you posted? - the darker one. I would be most interested in country of origin and time period.
View user's profile Send private message
Timo Nieminen




Location: Brisbane, Australia
Joined: 08 May 2009
Likes: 1 page
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 1,504

PostPosted: Fri 15 Dec, 2017 7:57 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

That particular one is a modern replica, but it's very much like the ones copied. See https://bighornforge.wordpress.com/2011/07/28/norse-style-ax-by-tom-latane-pepin-wi/ for details. Don't know about these particular ones, but this style is very 17th century, Norwegian.
"In addition to being efficient, all pole arms were quite nice to look at." - Cherney Berg, A hideous history of weapons, Collier 1963.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jonathan Hodge




Location: East Tennessee
Joined: 18 Sep 2015

Posts: 132

PostPosted: Sat 16 Dec, 2017 5:26 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thanks for the link. I was thinking Scandinavian for that axe too - good to know my intuition was leading me in the right direction.
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Maciejowski Bible Axe Construction
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum