| myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term. Last 10 Donors: Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors) |
Author |
Message |
Pedro Paulo Gaião
|
Posted: Sat 06 Aug, 2016 4:53 am Post subject: Some Questions about the Landsknecht |
|
|
Hello guys, I've been reading a lot about aspects of the history and organization of Landsknechts, as well as their similarities and differences with the Swiss mercenaries, so I would like to make some questions that some of you might be able to answer:
-> Most of the pictorial sources of the Landsknechts usually comes from woodcarvings from the early sixteenth century. However, most of these carvings shows virtually ALL mercenaries with little or no armor at all. Certain modern drawers even represent most of them fighting without armor and wearing their hats instead of helmets, for example. I know Landsknecht used to hate wearing armour outside battles, so that's probably explain why the carvings shows them in a more "casual manner" (as if they were in daily campsite live). Still, I have to ask: is it true that most of the Landsknechts, at least in the period 1487 to 1515/1525, were known to not be so armoured as, for example, the swiss were?
I also notice this picture:
Mail Hauberks were still a recurrent armour among them by early 16th century?
-> About Messers: It's usually claimed that Messers, Langmessers and Kriegsmessers, as german renaissance swords, were a popular weapon among the Landsknecht, however, they aren't nearly as popular as Katzbalger as it is shown. My question is: Messers really came to be popular weapons? It had some considerable adhesion between the Landsknechts, and if it had, it was just among Doppelsoldners?
Last Question: It is known that the Swiss didn't take prisoners, but Landsknechts also had this conduct? I know they don't spared Swiss and other Landsknechts enemies, but this also extended to high-born prisoners or anyone who could worth a good ransom?
|
|
|
|
Lafayette C Curtis
|
Posted: Sun 18 Sep, 2016 11:19 pm Post subject: Re: Some Questions about the Landsknecht |
|
|
Pedro Paulo Gaião wrote: | Most of the pictorial sources of the Landsknechts usually comes from woodcarvings from the early sixteenth century. However, most of these carvings shows virtually ALL mercenaries with little or no armor at all. Certain modern drawers even represent most of them fighting without armor and wearing their hats instead of helmets, for example. I know Landsknecht used to hate wearing armour outside battles, so that's probably explain why the carvings shows them in a more "casual manner" (as if they were in daily campsite live). Still, I have to ask: is it true that most of the Landsknechts, at least in the period 1487 to 1515/1525, were known to not be so armoured as, for example, the swiss were? |
It's not easy to answer this question since the level of armour in both Swiss and Landsknecht formations varied according to the individual soldier's place in the unit. The foremost ranks usually had fairly extensive armour, and in many cases so did the outermost files on both flanks of the unit (some even had well-armoured men in the very last rank too so the unarmoured or less well-armoured bulk of the formation was encased in a shell of armoured men).
You might also want to look into this thread: http://myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=33947
Quote: | I also notice this picture:
Mail Hauberks were still a recurrent armour among them by early 16th century? |
Yes. Mail shirts were extensively used throughout the 16th century -- it was particularly common among light cavalry. Another common configuration was a breastplate or cuirass with mail sleeves.
Quote: | Last Question: It is known that the Swiss didn't take prisoners, but Landsknechts also had this conduct? I know they don't spared Swiss and other Landsknechts enemies, but this also extended to high-born prisoners or anyone who could worth a good ransom? |
The thing about the Swiss not taking prisoners has been rather exaggerated. They took prisoners sometimes when there was a specific military or political reason for it, or when they had been specifically instructed to do so. So did the Landsknechts.
|
|
|
|
Lafayette C Curtis
|
|
|
|
Pedro Paulo Gaião
|
|
|
|
Mark Moore
|
Posted: Fri 08 Sep, 2017 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
The 'strange neck guard' you refer to is just a high-collared gorget. Pretty nice piece of armor in that day. ....McM
''Life is like a box of chocolates...'' --- F. Gump
|
|
|
|
Chris Friede
Location: Austin Joined: 15 Mar 2014
Posts: 39
|
Posted: Fri 08 Sep, 2017 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In regards to the messer...most of what I've read talks about how the messer was a very common weapon throughout the Germanic areas...."Here they fight with Messers, God ref their souls." Stands to reason Landsknecht would carry them as being pretty easy to find and probably some xperience with them just growing up German. The Katzbalger would have more cachet as a signature weapon, of course. These guys were all about the swagger.
|
|
|
|
Lafayette C Curtis
|
Posted: Sat 09 Sep, 2017 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, there's nothing even remotely odd about the articulated plate gorgets. They're very similar to the types attached to contemporary close-helmets.
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|