Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search


myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term.
Last 10 Donors: Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors)

Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Chinese "Long Swords" Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Craig Peters




PostPosted: Mon 29 Feb, 2016 3:38 am    Post subject: Chinese "Long Swords"         Reply with quote

I am curious about Ming Dynasty Chinese swords that require two hands and that have parallel edges; that is to say, swords that do not have curved blade. Are these swords still termed "jian"? Also, does anyone have a photo of an extant antique sword of this sort?
View user's profile Send private message
Lancelot Chan
Industry Professional



Location: Hong Kong
Joined: 24 Oct 2003
Likes: 2 pages

Posts: 1,307

PostPosted: Mon 29 Feb, 2016 5:47 am    Post subject: Re: Chinese "Long Swords"         Reply with quote

Craig Peters wrote:
I am curious about Ming Dynasty Chinese swords that require two hands and that have parallel edges; that is to say, swords that do not have curved blade. Are these swords still termed "jian"? Also, does anyone have a photo of an extant antique sword of this sort?


Yes. Seung Sau Gim (two handed jian). There are pics around but I dun have any one handy. They're still called Jian, for sure.

Ancient Combat Association —http://www.acahk.org
Realistic Sparring Weapons — http://www.rsw.com.hk
Nightstalkers — http://www.nightstalkers.com.hk
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Timo Nieminen




Location: Brisbane, Australia
Joined: 08 May 2009
Likes: 1 page
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 1,504

PostPosted: Mon 29 Feb, 2016 5:49 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

If you mean double-edged swords (there were straight dao, and jian usually have profile taper and therefore don't have parallel edges), then they're still jian. For a more specific name, you call them shuangshou jian 雙手剑 (or 双手剑), literally "two-handed sword".

I don't know of any Ming examples. I only know of one post-Ming example that "requires" two hands. Probably Qing.
http://www.swordsantiqueweapons.com/s1380_full.html
Longsword-sized. Handled this. I'd estimate it to be about 1.3kg, balanced a little further out than a European longsword, but the pivot point is close enough to the tip for good longsword-like handling.

More common are smaller jian with two-handed grips. These don't require two-hands, so might not fit your criteria. Some Qing examples:
http://www.mandarinmansion.com/items/shuangsh...sword-sold
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=5910

It's easier to find pre-Ming examples.

"In addition to being efficient, all pole arms were quite nice to look at." - Cherney Berg, A hideous history of weapons, Collier 1963.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Lafayette C Curtis




Location: Indonesia
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Reading list: 7 books

Posts: 2,698

PostPosted: Mon 18 Apr, 2016 1:44 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

You might find one or two here.

http://forum.grtc.org/viewtopic.php?t=893
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Chinese "Long Swords"
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum