
| myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term. Last 10 Donors: Adam James, Piotr H. Feret, Graham Shearlaw, Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins (View All Donors) |
| Author |
Message |
|
Henrik Granlid
|
Posted: Thu 19 Sep, 2013 2:54 pm Post subject: why was the safe thumb abandoned for the hinged? |
|
|
Discussing modern safety requirements of heavy reenactment combat such as SCA and HMB, the topic of thumbs came up. Modern rules require the thumb be fixed to and supported by the backplate of the gauntlet, much like the thumbs on 14th century hourglass gauntlets, this is due to the risk of breaking, dislocating or crushing the thumb, or pretty much shoving it back into the arm (shudder).
However, ince the hourglass gauntlets went out of fashion, we see a boom in late 14th century thumbs being attatched by hinges or separate plates, and by the 15th century, nearly all plate gauntlets have the less safe, more technically challenging hinged thumb-piece.
The hinged thumb does offer larger plate coverage of the hand, however, it exposes an integral part of your grip to being literally bent out of shape or smushed.
So why is there such a plethora of a hard to make, structurally weak piece of protection for the thumb? What am I missing?
|
|
|
 |
|
Guy Bayes
Location: United States Joined: 07 Oct 2012
Posts: 64
|
|
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2026 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|