Author |
Message |
Karsten Rohweder
Location: Tübingen, Germany Joined: 09 Jan 2010
Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed 16 Nov, 2011 12:57 am Post subject: Klingbeil Collection auction catalog |
|
|
Dear all,
By chance I read today that the Klingbeil collection is going to be auctioned off in December. While the artifacts are probably outside of the price range of most here, including me , there's a pretty good auction catalog as PDF freely downloadable. Lots of pictures of arms and armour in there, with good dating and descriptions. Just the picture quality is a bit low.
http://www.pba-auctions.com/html/index.jsp?id=11675
I don't know how to feel about this auction. The thought of all that stuff being scattered and hidden away in private possessions isn't so great, although it wasn't exactly publicly accessible before either. I'll risk sounding like Indiana Jones here: this should have gone into a museum! As a whole.
Karsten
[/img]
|
|
|
|
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team
|
Posted: Wed 16 Nov, 2011 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
That collection is amazing and used to include the sword of Edward III (which does belong in a museum). I didn't see it among the auction listings.
I was surprised at the high estimates given to the many 19th century copies of earlier pieces. In some cases, you can get better 21st century replicas for less.
ChadA
http://chadarnow.com/
|
|
|
|
Ben Sweet
|
Posted: Wed 16 Nov, 2011 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Some pretty amazing pieces in there, I like the tournament, fechtschwert, #113 but clicking on the photo to get a close up is rather annoying when it pops up to be smaller that the actual photo...
|
|
|
|
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin
|
Posted: Wed 16 Nov, 2011 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ben Sweet wrote: | Some pretty amazing pieces in there, I like the tournament, fechtschwert, #113 but clicking on the photo to get a close up is rather annoying when it pops up to be smaller that the actual photo... |
Yeah, the collection is amazing (even the dubious stuff is nice!), but that auction catalog is horrible unfortunately.
.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
|
|
|
|
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin
|
Posted: Wed 16 Nov, 2011 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As Chad mentioned, I also didn't see the "Edward III" sword (as documentd in Oakeshott's Records of the Medieval Sword) in that auction. It's part of the collection. I wonder if some of the premier/renown items have been removed.
I must add that it's nice to see the auction pointing out composite construction and modern dates. This is very refreshing compared to what we've been seeing from auction houses over the last few years.
.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
|
|
|
|
Marik C.S.
|
Posted: Wed 16 Nov, 2011 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow that is one amazing collection. This doesn't belong into a museum because most of us wouldn't be able to visit said museum.
This belongs into a castle somewhere - just for atmosphere - there it should be merged with the Wallace Collection - at least for a while - and completely pictured so anyone from around the world can see them and we don't have to invade someone's house just because he bought these beautiful pieces.
Kind of like Google Streetview.
With a creepy virtual count as a tour-guide.
Or that Paper-clip from MS Word.
Europe - Where the History comes from. - Eddie Izzard
|
|
|
|
Neil Melville
|
Posted: Wed 16 Nov, 2011 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I understand that the collection is being auctioned in 2 halves, the 1st in December in Brussels by Pierre Berge (pba-auctions) the 2nd next June by Hermann Historica, so maybe the missing expected items will be in the 2nd set. We'll see.
Neil
N Melville
|
|
|
|
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin
|
Posted: Wed 16 Nov, 2011 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Neil Melville wrote: | I understand that the collection is being auctioned in 2 halves, the 1st in December in Brussels by Pierre Berge (pba-auctions) the 2nd next June by Hermann Historica, so maybe the missing expected items will be in the 2nd set. We'll see.
Neil |
Thank you for that insight! I think you're probably right about the second set...
.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
|
|
|
|
Joe Fults
|
Posted: Wed 16 Nov, 2011 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As this stuff all goes through the process of being redistributed we better enjoy the viewing. Once done it will probably be another twenty or thirty years (or more) before most of these things are seen in public again.
"The goal shouldn’t be to avoid being evil; it should be to actively do good." - Danah Boyd
|
|
|
|
Gregory J. Liebau
Location: Dinuba, CA Joined: 27 Nov 2004
Posts: 669
|
Posted: Wed 16 Nov, 2011 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think the current inventory shown in the PDF available from Pierre Berge is the entire collection, even though they may not be in charge of auctioning it all. The downloadable 370 page PDF catalog is exactly the same as the online version available from Hermann Historica, shown below.
http://www.hermann-historica.de/auktion63/ebo...x.html#/1/
|
|
|
|
Randall Moffett
|
Posted: Thu 17 Nov, 2011 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very, very cool. Is it just me or is the listing for the Churburg-like segmented breastplate stated as being original and the bascinet from the 19th?
Does it ever state why he is getting ride of all this? It gives a really detailed reason for him buying it.
RPM
|
|
|
|
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team
|
Posted: Thu 17 Nov, 2011 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Randall Moffett wrote: | Very, very cool. Is it just me or is the listing for the Churburg-like segmented breastplate stated as being original and the bascinet from the 19th? |
The segmented breastplate is mentioned as being made from old plates. So the plates may be original but they're not in their original configuration.
ChadA
http://chadarnow.com/
|
|
|
|
Carlo Paggiarino
Industry Professional
|
Posted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am sorry to disappoint you all.
Please do not think that I am disrespectful but I feel like saying that you should read the descriptions more carefully and understand exactly what they say.
"Constructed from early plates" and "Appear to be formed by reworked early armour" without giving a precise date and stating "in the italian style of circa 1360-70" does not mean original 1360-1370 plates mounted differently.
Karsten Klingbeil tried for at least 15 years to sell his collection as a whole but he never succeeded. His request was initially around the 16 millions euro mark. Maybe there is good reason why he struggled for so long and decided to consign part of his collection to an auction house instead.
|
|
|
|
Adam Bohnstengel
Location: Spring, TX Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 72
|
Posted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Does anyone have any better pictures of item number 8, a war sword from 1300-1350 (probably XIIa)?
Violence is the supreme authority from which all other authority is derived.
|
|
|
|
Carlo Paggiarino
Industry Professional
|
Posted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Adam Bohnstengel wrote: | Does anyone have any better pictures of item number 8, a war sword from 1300-1350 (probably XIIa)? |
If you have a serious interest I can help you. Please contact me via PM.
|
|
|
|
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team
|
Posted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Carlo Paggiarino wrote: | "Constructed from early plates" and "Appear to be formed by reworked early armour" without giving a precise date and stating "in the italian style of circa 1360-70" does not mean original 1360-1370 plates mounted differently.
|
Carlo,
Please note I never mentioned believing it was from the 14th century, only that the listing stated the plates were original. The listing, and I, never mentioned to what century the plates might be original.
ChadA
http://chadarnow.com/
Last edited by Chad Arnow on Sat 19 Nov, 2011 12:37 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
Carlo Paggiarino
Industry Professional
|
Posted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chad Arnow wrote: | Carlo Paggiarino wrote: | "Constructed from early plates" and "Appear to be formed by reworked early armour" without giving a precise date and stating "in the italian style of circa 1360-70" does not mean original 1360-1370 plates mounted differently.
|
Carlo,
Please note I never mentioned believing it was from the 14th century, only that the listing stated the plates were original. The listing, and I, never mentioned to what century the plates might be original. |
Chad, mine was a general observation.
Catalogues description can be tricky!
;-)
|
|
|
|
Randall Moffett
|
Posted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was simply asking for others to comment on the information there as I had some questions on how they worded it. In the French version it almost seems to indicate both are 19th but not in the English version.
I have no doubt other people had the Bashford-Dean gene and cobbled what they could together with random parts.
I got handed a box full of plates from early modern armour at one point and for several moments thought it'd be interesting to see what I could do.... would have been faster than what I did in slowly sorting them all out and putting them together how they should be.
RPM
|
|
|
|
Neil Melville
|
Posted: Sun 27 Nov, 2011 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Returning to my earlier comment: the present catalogue is clearly titled "Premiere Vente" (first sale) and "Part One", referring to the December sale in Brussels. The introduction states that the collection consists of 600 items; this sale consists of 239 items (+100 crabs, lobsters and other crustaceans). Also the 'group' photos on the cover and inside include items which are not in the first part, so I think that there is a lot more to come which we do not yet know about in the second part next June.
Neil
N Melville
|
|
|
|
D. Swift
|
|
|
|
|