I payed 680 Euro for the sword ( $960 or 600 British Pounds ). Last week I got the sword finally. The moment I unpacked it, I knew that under no circumstances I could accept this and I would never keep it in my collection. It's just not the kind of craftsmanship I am used to (I have swords by Binns, Noyes, Cervenka, Albion, Hakun Risti, Pavel Marek, Berbekucz, …). The sword is (in my eyes) amateurishly done, like something that someone built for himself. Definitely nothing I would pay nearly $1000 for. The sword has a deepeeka-wallhanger appeal, if you know what I mean.
- I had ordered a sharp blade, the blade is blunt.
- The grip/hilt looks terrible. It's made of oak and I guess the piece of wood just wasn't suitable for the job. It looks yellowish, a bit like it's carved out of a broomstick. There's a tear in the wood. The texture of the wood looks terrible.
- The enamel inlay turned out quite ugly as well. The inlays on the chape are really amateurishly done.
-The blade has no real point. The tip of the sword is 3 milimeters wide.
I complained about these points and wanted to give the sword back, but he won't take it back and refuses to see what I don't like about the sword. He offered to sharpen the blade and to rehilt it. But in my opinion the entire job went wrong and I just can't accept it.
I'll try to upload some fotos and I'd like to have your opinion on the sword.
Kind regards
Andreas

Pic 1 [ Download ]

Pic 2 [ Download ]

Enamel [ Download ]

Enamel scabbard [ Download ]

Grip [ Download ]

Grip 2 [ Download ]

Point [ Download ]

Tear in the wood, right in the middle of the picture [ Download ]