[Eric Meulemans]

In continuing research related to my History MA work, as well as personal curiosity motivated by such, I pose the question to you, with regard to Western Martial Arts/Historical European Martial Arts:

[Chad Arnow]

You may be better off with an additional category: collector/practitioner.

[Anders Backlund]

Hard to tell. I am interested in both fields, but I wouldn't call myself a martial artist or a scholar.

See, I'm interested in swords and I'm interested in martial arts, but I'm not very interested in history. My focus lies in trying to understand how a sword is made and how it is used, and any historical knowledge I manage to aquire is really just a byproduct of this primary interest. And if I ever take up serious historical european martial arts, my intent is more likely to be to understand how to best use a specific type of weapon rather then understanding "my historical martial heritage" or whatever.

So, I'm really not sure which category I fit best.

[Joe Fults]

Hobbyist, amateur or dabbler if I must be classified.

[Vincent Le Chevalier]

Well I'm a bit of a special case I'm afraid...

I train in Japanese swordmanship because it's the most practical sword-related training I can get. On the other hand, the most interesting things I read about swordmanship, and the fencing theories I like best, are in Western manuals, so I'd probably qualify as a low-level pure academic in WMA

So I don't know, how would you like me to vote in this case ?

[Jean Thibodeau]

Academic sound a bit pretentious unless one is working on a doctorate degree in of some sort related to history, military history, archaeology degree or museum curatorship.

More accurately would be to call most of us history and arms history buffs.

As far as " practitioners " how does one calculate being half and half academic or practitioner ?

I would say that anyone who takes some sword training or at least attempts solo training is doing both: What is hard to quantify would be a % of time spent on each or rather the amount of importance each has a a focus of interest except in a very subjective way ?

Personally I have always been interested in weapons aesthetically and as designs, this leading to an interest in military history and inevitably leading to just plain history.

Movies swordfights obviously stimulated my imagination while growing up but provided little in the accuracy department about real swordsmanship.

A few book purchases in the late 1980's and early 90's about WMA gave me a clue about what I was missing and finally reading posts here on myArmoury gave me the information I needed to get better books and DVDs about the subject and finally I found a group teaching longsword close to where I live.

The degree of " work & Dedication " I will put into it depends on how much the activity appeals to me, but initially the motivation was and is mostly curiosity. It is starting to become interesting and " fun " not to mention great for physical fitness and very calming for the mind.

So, unless there is a category I can fit in I will wait as far as voting in this poll.

[William Goodwin]

I'm with Chad on the "collector / practitioner" sub-catagory. At this point in time, I'm focusing more on the
pratitioner side of things, bu tht e collecting interest is and always will be there.


Bill

[Nicholas A. Gaese]

hi!

I only joined this forum as of last year but i was lead to this forum by chance in 2005 and i still read most of the discussions posted here, even if I admittedly only made 2 real posts. I took on an interest in swords since 2002 and had used the internet to learn as much as i can about the subject. It took me 3 years to discover what a real sword is, and another 2 years to grasp the concept of its proper martial application. And this is where my problem comes in. I would consider myself mostly a scholar mostly because in as much as I had learned about swords I never have been able to apply it in any way.

I have a question for Jean. Being a fellow montrealer I was wondering if there is a place nearby that teaches any forms of WMA? I live in the west Island and am in mid transition from cegep to university and I would be very interested in taking a look around if thats possible.

My Thanks in advance,

Nicholas

[Victor R.]

How about: a novice, seeking the knowledge of academics with a desire to become a practitioner. At least, that's how I see myself at this time.

[Craig Peters]

I'm a practitioner, though some might also call me a scholar. But, since I have not been specifically involved in any new research with a particular fencing manual, I am not sure that I'd qualify as a scholar. After all, I would assume we are talking about someone who does research into the manuals and produces new interpretations. Otherwise, everyone who seriously practices historic European martial arts is a scholar to a greater or lesser degree.

[Gary A. Chelette]

Studying Asian Martial Arts from the age of 15 and changing over WMA back in 1988, I would consider myself an expert in WMA and an enthusiast in it's art and History.

Practitioner, yes. Scholar, unsure. There will be people who will always know more than I.

[Jean Thibodeau]

[Fabrice Cognot]

I am both. This being said as a metter of fact.



And, as you guessed, it takes time and energy.







Vincent : you missed Dijon !! How come ???? Boooooh !!!

[Anders Backlund]

[Nicholas A. Gaese]

HI again!

My Thanks Jean for the information! Ya your right that is a long haul but i'm pretty used to long trips and it is accessible via metro so really the only real factor is patience, which I have been blessed with plenty of . I'll give them a call when I get the spare time, it'll be fun to check it out. Btw how are the fellow's English? Unfortunatly even though im a Quebecer my French still suffers, though i can decently comprehend it, its the speaking im no good at. Thanks again Jean!

Nicholas

[Eric Meulemans]

Thank you all very much for your input and discussion on this topic.

[Sean Smith]

I answered both, because I am an active member of a fighting community (SCA), yet love studying and applying knowledge about the timeperiod I re-create. Haven't gotten to the point where I am really adding new things to the knowledge base, excepting reading several different authors and getting a "meta-view" in my head, from different perspectives. And helping others who are less learned than I. Hoping in a few years to do some in depth studying firsthand when we are in Croatia (wife is an anthropologist). So much of that stuff is just coming to light for the first time.

[Hugo Voisine]

Given the current choices, I would define myself more like a practitioner, and a collector second. My apartment is filled with shiny pieces of steel, but still my main interest is more "how can I just my swords" rather than "how much can I get".

As for being a scholar... I'm just too full of intellectual laziness for that.

[Shamsi Modarai]

Its really good to know that my guess about this place was correct: that many members are "scholarly" (or at least, consider themselves as such) as well as hands-on. In fact, I was recently having (a rather heated) discussion with someone in my programme about scholars vs. practitioners/reenactors. He said that he hated both, but I came to the defense of both. So nyah.

I put myself as both a 'scholar' and a 'practitioner', because I am currently writing my MA dissertation on a medieval/military theme as well as the fact that I am someone who has dabbled with using a myriad of sharp pointy objects. What I am *not* at the moment is a collector, in which I am probably the minority on this board. I would love to be one someday, but due to being a poor academic, that path currently eludes me. ;-)

[Jean Thibodeau]