Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Couter Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page 1, 2  Next 
Author Message
Paulius B. Voss




Location: Vilnius
Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Reading list: 2 books

Posts: 21

PostPosted: Sat 19 Apr, 2008 11:35 pm    Post subject: Couter         Reply with quote

Hi everyone!
What do think about that counter? (found in Lithuania during archaeological excavations)





I really need your opinion. Thanks
View user's profile Send private message
Russ Thomas
Industry Professional



Location: Telemark, Norway
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Reading list: 43 books

Posts: 323

PostPosted: Sun 20 Apr, 2008 3:56 am    Post subject: Couter..........         Reply with quote

Paulius,

I would say that it is Italian or French, ca 1560-70. It may be German, but I do not think so. Personally, I would opt for it being Italian. James Gillaspie or Doug Strong are the persons to ask really. They know far more about armour than I do. But that is my sort of educated guess.

Regards,

Russ

Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero !


http://www.living-history.no
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Torsten F.H. Wilke




Location: Irvine Spectrum, CA
Joined: 01 Jul 2006

Posts: 250

PostPosted: Sun 20 Apr, 2008 7:13 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I would like to identify that particular specimen as a 1520's Nuremburg manufactured Max piece. This is based upon the the general flowing full-circumferential one-piece design, heavily roped edging especially at the elbow cusp, and lack of articulating lames pointing to direct attachment of the cannons and rerebraces...

ps; Hope I'm correct Laughing Out Loud
View user's profile Send private message
James Arlen Gillaspie
Industry Professional



Location: upstate NY
Joined: 10 Nov 2005

Posts: 587

PostPosted: Sun 20 Apr, 2008 9:25 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Russ pretty much nailed it. Yup. It's a standard type that shows up around 1550. Seems like all the collectors have at least one.
jamesarlen.com
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Torsten F.H. Wilke




Location: Irvine Spectrum, CA
Joined: 01 Jul 2006

Posts: 250

PostPosted: Mon 21 Apr, 2008 9:02 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Well, I guess the experts have this one... Big Grin

In my defense, there were some good similarities to the late small-coutered Max stuff, especially with the lack of wing flaring on the inner part. Didn't the later 1550's styles tend more towards symmetry in the outer and inner wings? The heavily gilded harness of the mounted Man-At-Arms featured in the Armuria of the Doge's Palace has couters very similar to the one in this topic's posted photos.
View user's profile Send private message
Paulius B. Voss




Location: Vilnius
Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Reading list: 2 books

Posts: 21

PostPosted: Tue 22 Apr, 2008 4:47 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thanks guys!
it's great to have a deal with those who well understands about an armour.
View user's profile Send private message
Randall Moffett




Location: Northern Utah
Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Reading list: 5 books

Posts: 2,121

PostPosted: Tue 22 Apr, 2008 11:27 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

James,

Could it not be late 16th or early 17th. I have seen a number of 3/4 suits with such couters thought they fan out somewhat more than these. Just a quick thought after actually getting to see the picture in the first post to come up for me.

RPM



 Attachment: 130.09 KB
[ Download ]
View user's profile Send private message
James Arlen Gillaspie
Industry Professional



Location: upstate NY
Joined: 10 Nov 2005

Posts: 587

PostPosted: Tue 22 Apr, 2008 12:19 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Yes, I should have been paying more attention to how LATE the style goes. I was thinking about stratigraphy, and how early the sample could possibly be dated to. Similar couters were in use much earlier, but the really tiny ones, like the above, are usually Italian or possibly French. German ones are almost always bigger, in my experience, except for the following (makes me wonder, though, if there aren't earlier German ones. Could be, just don't remember any examples). Very similar couters do indeed occur on some of the late munition 3/4 armours in the Graz arsenal (so we have to throw the Styrians into the mix!). However, they just don't have the heavy roping on the borders that this one does, which is more a midcentury trait; not that you'd expect to see much heavy roping on a munition piece, anyway. Here's a typical Italian example, c. 1560, from Wade Allen's collection. EDIT; Hmm, after looking at the dimensions on the excavated piece, if that scale is correct, that's one hell of a BIG couter for one in this style. Wade's is approx. 7 inches (178 mm) from back to front. Must have been made for quite a large fellow.


 Attachment: 11.42 KB
mini-A-37.jpg


jamesarlen.com
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Randall Moffett




Location: Northern Utah
Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Reading list: 5 books

Posts: 2,121

PostPosted: Tue 22 Apr, 2008 12:45 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

James,

Yes that is true. Wade's looks shape wise very similar. I did not realize how big it was either. Here is another one I found from a 3/4 suit (I worked on 11 of them at one point so sorry if it seems I am obsessed just have them on hand to look at and somewhat fresh in my mind). Not nearly as heavily roped edges as the one in question but roped. I think you are right that more likely it is mid 16th but wanted to toss the possibility of it being later as well.

RPM



 Attachment: 105.76 KB
[ Download ]
View user's profile Send private message
James Arlen Gillaspie
Industry Professional



Location: upstate NY
Joined: 10 Nov 2005

Posts: 587

PostPosted: Tue 22 Apr, 2008 9:21 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Randall, did you post the wrong picture? The couter in question, and Wade's couter, are attached with leathers, not lames. Here's some late examples from Graz, that are very similar in overall proportion, but no roping (It looks like your lame articulated ones are, though, at least down the middle). Also, the borders are not recessed, and this pic doesn't show the points of the elbows, which could look different from theexcavated couter and Wade's.


 Attachment: 132.03 KB
[ Download ]

jamesarlen.com
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Randall Moffett




Location: Northern Utah
Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Reading list: 5 books

Posts: 2,121

PostPosted: Tue 22 Apr, 2008 10:31 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

James,

No its the right one. I am just pointing on the style continues well after mid 16th.

RPM
View user's profile Send private message
Torsten F.H. Wilke




Location: Irvine Spectrum, CA
Joined: 01 Jul 2006

Posts: 250

PostPosted: Wed 23 Apr, 2008 8:24 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thanks James,

That photo showed a great view of the asymmetry between the outer and inner wing flares, something I wasn't sure existed that late. Also noteworthy for me was the attachment method using leathers in that style...
View user's profile Send private message
James Arlen Gillaspie
Industry Professional



Location: upstate NY
Joined: 10 Nov 2005

Posts: 587

PostPosted: Wed 23 Apr, 2008 10:23 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

This is a VERY specific type of couter, produced in great quantities - a lot like talking about a '57 Chevy. They exist in two types; some with recessed borders, some, like this example, without. Convertible or hardtop, I suppose, though I think the recessed border type would be a bit more expensive. I'd certainly charge more. Sorry about the quality of the pic's; this is one of many I've handled. Whenever they turn up, they are routinely described as being c. 1560, but I'll certainly keep an eye out for the latest harness these appear on!


 Attachment: 62.63 KB
couter 002.jpg


 Attachment: 110.12 KB
[ Download ]

 Attachment: 112.34 KB
[ Download ]

jamesarlen.com
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
James Arlen Gillaspie
Industry Professional



Location: upstate NY
Joined: 10 Nov 2005

Posts: 587

PostPosted: Wed 23 Apr, 2008 10:53 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Oh, and here's a bigger pic of Wade's - it really is a VERY good match for the excavated piece, except that the recessed border appears to go all the way around on the excavated couter.


 Attachment: 145.42 KB
A-37.det.jpg


jamesarlen.com
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Paulius B. Voss




Location: Vilnius
Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Reading list: 2 books

Posts: 21

PostPosted: Wed 23 Apr, 2008 11:27 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Great! That couter was found in a layer of end of 16th century Happy
Many thanks! Your information was very useful for me.
View user's profile Send private message
Torsten F.H. Wilke




Location: Irvine Spectrum, CA
Joined: 01 Jul 2006

Posts: 250

PostPosted: Wed 23 Apr, 2008 2:25 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Very nice! And this all brings me to another question: Why are there so many of these singular pieces left over?

ps; And Darn you, James and Randall, for knowing so much Happy
View user's profile Send private message
Paulius B. Voss




Location: Vilnius
Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Reading list: 2 books

Posts: 21

PostPosted: Thu 24 Apr, 2008 1:50 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Torsten, are you talking about the place of archaeological excavations?
View user's profile Send private message
Robert MacPherson
Industry Professional



Location: Jeffersonville USA
Joined: 27 Feb 2008

Posts: 141

PostPosted: Thu 24 Apr, 2008 7:16 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Torsten,

These elbow cops are typically attached to their upper and lower cannons by internal leather straps, rather than by riveted, mechanical articulations. All that is necessary for them to become separated from the rest of the arm armor is for this leather to fail. This leather failure can occur(historically) at any time. Thus, they might become separated on the battle field or during extended storage in the armory, between uses. They could easily become detached while the armor was in a collection, be put in a drawer for safe keeping, and then not follow the armor when the collection was sold.

When you combine the facts that these elbows:
were produced in large numbers,
were made relatively recently(16thc.),
are easily detached,
are themselves more interesting curios then the cannons they fell of of,
It's not at all surprising that they survive in large numbers by themselves.

Mac
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Torsten F.H. Wilke




Location: Irvine Spectrum, CA
Joined: 01 Jul 2006

Posts: 250

PostPosted: Fri 02 May, 2008 12:15 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Paulius, sorry for the late reply. I was merely wondering about the general abundance of these later style couters, and not just at that particular excavation site. It must be fairly exhilarating to be personally involved with finding such treasures.

And Robert, that was a very reasonable explanation, thank you for that.

.


Last edited by Torsten F.H. Wilke on Sun 04 May, 2008 10:29 pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message
Russ Thomas
Industry Professional



Location: Telemark, Norway
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Reading list: 43 books

Posts: 323

PostPosted: Fri 02 May, 2008 7:16 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hi folks,

I should have kept a check on this topic, sorry about that Worried

I stick quite firmly to my original thoughts regarding this piece, Italian or French 1560 -70, but probably Italian I think. Yes , it could be a bit later or earlier,and it could be French, but I don't think so. Any way that is my two cents, lire, ecu, pennies, Øre or whatevers worth! Happy I am quite certain, (for whatever that is worth ! Big Grin ), that is is not German.

James,

This has no relevance on the topic whatsoever, but I just wondered:

That picture of the couter from Wades collection, is it a genuine piece? It looks rather victorian to me, and the old, what looks like silver paint, doesn' t help much either. The whole piece seems to be relatively recent, say 150 years or so ? Any thoughts on it ?? The roping, the hinge, the colour and rust etc. all lead me to this conclusion. Not that I am an expert by any means, but I have handled and worked with a lot of Victorian pieces,quite similar to these while I worked at Robert White & Sons.

Regards,

Russ

Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero !


http://www.living-history.no
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Couter
Page 1 of 2 Reply to topic
Go to page 1, 2  Next All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum