Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Swords in Gothic and Renaissance Art Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Lukasz Derewiecki




Location: Poland
Joined: 29 Nov 2007
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 2

PostPosted: Tue 04 Dec, 2007 4:47 am    Post subject: Swords in Gothic and Renaissance Art         Reply with quote

Hello

Below, you can see a few examples of swords which I found in Polish late Gothic and early Renaissance art.
I also tried to categorize them according to the Oakeshott's typology and I would like to make sure if I did it correct.
What do you think about these swords?
I invite you to the discussion.

1. Two woodcuts made in Cracow in first half of 16th century shows a swords of Type XX.



 Attachment: 46.02 KB
z_4_Pol_Typ_270.jpg


 Attachment: 49.8 KB
13_Bolesl_Crzyuousti.jpg



Last edited by Lukasz Derewiecki on Tue 04 Dec, 2007 12:19 pm; edited 2 times in total
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lukasz Derewiecki




Location: Poland
Joined: 29 Nov 2007
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 2

PostPosted: Tue 04 Dec, 2007 4:54 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

2. Painting from the first half of 16th century shows a swords of Type XVIII


 Attachment: 31.76 KB
264.jpg

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Thomas Parsons




Location: Strasbourg (France)
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Reading list: 23 books

Posts: 13

PostPosted: Thu 10 Jan, 2008 12:07 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Greetings! And thank you for bringing to my attention these interesting works.

Now down to the nit and grit:

Oakeshott's typology takes three elements of the sword into account:
- pommel (alphabetical cataloging)
- crossguard (arab numerals)
- blade (roman numerals; this is the element that made his typology so revolutional and often leads us to ommit the other two ).

So when describing any weapon to the full with his typology we must name all three elements, Oakeshott does so in this order: blade / pommel / crossguard and so shall I.

Arrow Here I'll add that I agree with you about the blade format of the first image Wink
Thus the full description of the sword featured in the first illustration (involving St Peter) would read: XX, T4, 5

Arrow Next comes the slavic dignitary (I really cannot place him geographically other than from somewhere between Scandinavia and Hungary... I would appreciate input as to the original location this piece was produced in). Here I am slighlty at a loss as to the blade, it is not completely clear wether it depicts:

- two fullers running the length of the blade; which doesn't fit the type XX blade description (closer to viking descriptions really Exclamation ...)
- one single wider fuller also running the length of the blade; this would place it as either a type X or Xa both of which seem extraordinarily odd seeing as these blades date back to the Xth century if not slightly earlier...

The cross however presents us with only one clear possibility: a style 12 typically "S" curved crossguard

The pommel is I believe of the same type as the previously discussed sword: T4

This gives us a (nearly Wink )full description reading: ?, T4, 12


Arrow Finally the heart pierced saint:

I cannot agree to the sole XVIII type blade whose key characteristics is to have a broad blade at the hilt with edges tapering in a curve to form a sharp point.
- Firstly the blade certainly tapers to a point but not in a curved manner.
- Secondly taking the overall proportions of the weapon into account I would say that the blade is positively slender. This is better understood if you take into account the fact that it seems that a small portion of the blade is already embedded in the saints chest, yet even assuming the blade is on the verge of penetration the weapon has very "slim" lines...

All that to support my idea that it is in fact a type XVIIIb blade in this instance.


The cross could be one of two styles, the obvious leather chappe here masks the location where the differentiating detail would be. The two possibilities being:
- style 5
- style 10


The pommel is slighlty unclear so all I can say in this instance is that would seem to be of the "T" family, which one I cannot say...

so once again nearly complete descritpion: XVIIIb, T( Question ), 5 or 10



Hope this helps!


Last edited by Thomas Parsons on Fri 11 Jan, 2008 12:10 pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message
Thomas Parsons




Location: Strasbourg (France)
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Reading list: 23 books

Posts: 13

PostPosted: Thu 10 Jan, 2008 12:10 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

One question: I don't suppose you have a slighlty more specific date than "early XVIth" for the lady saint? only the work looks as though it could alo be late XVth which would also fit the sword depicted... Possibly the artists' name?

Thanks!
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Swords in Gothic and Renaissance Art
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum