Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search


myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term.
Last 10 Donors: Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors)

Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Windlass german mace Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Christopher Finneman




Location: Sartell Minnesota
Joined: 20 Mar 2006

Posts: 159

PostPosted: Mon 17 Dec, 2007 3:45 pm    Post subject: Windlass german mace         Reply with quote

Hello there.

I have read the review on the german mace made by windlass.

I just have a few questions about it.

First off how durable you all think this is due to the weight being fairly low?. And I know the shaft is hollow but whats the thickness of the walls. If I end up buying this I dont want it to bend or break due to the shaft being to thin.
Any info would be appreciated.
Thanks
Christopher

Proudly it stands until the worlds end. The victorious banner of love.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Sean Flynt




Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Likes: 10 pages
Reading list: 13 books

Spotlight topics: 7
Posts: 5,981

PostPosted: Tue 18 Dec, 2007 12:49 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

That was my mace. I would guess--and it's only a guess--that the Windlass's relatively low weight is due to thinner haft walls. I'm not sure that original maces would necessarily have been significantly more durable, though. I would expect the welded modern construction to be stronger than historical brazed construction. While I would expect the Windlass mace to fail (bend) in the haft, I'd expect a medieval mace to fail (break) at the brazing of the flanges. Again, that's pure speculation on my part. Maybe our resident metallurgists can clarify that. IIRC, I have seen at least one original mace with a bent haft. Who knows how many bent mace hafts have been straightened in modern times?

Based on some contemporary artwork I saw recently, I think this mace, given its weight and length, might fit a bit better in the second quarter of the 15th c.

Bill Grandy owns this mace now. If he has used it he might be able to give us some idea how durable it feels to him when used against various targets.

-Sean

Author of the Little Hammer novel

https://www.amazon.com/Little-Hammer-Sean-Flynt/dp/B08XN7HZ82/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=little+hammer+book&qid=1627482034&sr=8-1
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Kjell Magnusson




Location: Sweden
Joined: 10 Jun 2004

Posts: 123

PostPosted: Tue 18 Dec, 2007 5:53 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Sean Flynt wrote:
I would expect the welded modern construction to be stronger than historical brazed construction. While I would expect the Windlass mace to fail (bend) in the haft, I'd expect a medieval mace to fail (break) at the brazing of the flanges. Again, that's pure speculation on my part. Maybe our resident metallurgists can clarify that.


From what I've heard, brazing can stand up very well to welding in a modern setting (the latter being very rough on the base material, which can cause a number of problems). The advantages to welding were, from what I can recall, mostly economical. I won't try any guesses though to what extent this translates to older times.
View user's profile Send private message
Jared Smith




Location: Tennessee
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Likes: 1 page

Spotlight topics: 3
Posts: 1,532

PostPosted: Tue 18 Dec, 2007 6:47 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I have to agree that a number of modern high performance things still utilize brazing. Several rocket engine nozzles for example. Once the brazing process is proven for a relatively similar geometry and application, repeatability is pretty good.
Absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence!
View user's profile Send private message
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Mon 24 Dec, 2007 3:28 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I'm not sure how this one compares in thickness to historical, but I've run across a number of historical specimens with hollow hafts. So that type of construction is historical, though the execution (ie thickness of the tube) could be less than so... Happy
Happy

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Peter G.




Location: Bad Kreuznach/Germany
Joined: 16 Nov 2007

Posts: 78

PostPosted: Tue 25 Dec, 2007 2:36 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

IIRC most original metal maces had hollow hafts-afaik a hollow shaft is more stable then a massive shaft-doesn´t bend that easily.
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Windlass german mace
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum