Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Two handed swords Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Rodolfo Martínez




Location: Argentina
Joined: 30 Nov 2006

Posts: 347

PostPosted: Thu 07 Dec, 2006 1:31 pm    Post subject: Two handed swords         Reply with quote

Hello genltemen!

I´ve been searching trough Yahoo an Goolge, and i found very hard for me to find the answer to my question.
Did XV century knights used two handed swords in foot combat?
I found info about their longswords, and that those swords were more poular between knights, but no convincent information about if they truly used two handed swords. For example, some sites i visited said that ¨two handers were mercenary only weapns¨ while in others i found ¨Great swords were knightly weapons becouse of their 20 pounds weight¨ and such stuff. I don´t think that this formidable weapons were only used by foot soldiers and not by knights, and i know that their weight was around 4, or 5 pounds.

So, if someone can help me with any accurate link about XV century ¨knightly¨ two hander swords, italian or german ones, in this or in other sites, i will be very grateful.

Thanks to all.

¨Sólo me desenvainarás por honor y nunca me envainarás sin gloria¨
View user's profile Send private message
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin


myArmoury Admin

PostPosted: Thu 07 Dec, 2006 1:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Two handed swords         Reply with quote

Rodolfo Martínez wrote:
Hello genltemen!

I´ve been searching trough Yahoo an Goolge, and i found very hard for me to find the answer to my question.
Did XV century knights used two handed swords in foot combat?
I found info about their longswords, and that those swords were more poular between knights, but no convincent information about if they truly used two handed swords. For example, some sites i visited said that ¨two handers were mercenary only weapns¨ while in others i found ¨Great swords were knightly weapons becouse of their 20 pounds weight¨ and such stuff. I don´t think that this formidable weapons were only used by foot soldiers and not by knights, and i know that their weight was around 4, or 5 pounds.

So, if someone can help me with any accurate link about XV century ¨knightly¨ two hander swords, italian or german ones, in this or in other sites, i will be very grateful.

Thanks to all.


There is much to be read.

Two-handed swords that were not processional / parade swords were never 20 pounds in weight, but were closer to 5 to 8 pounds. Single-handed swords are very rarely 4 or 5 pounds in weight but typically weigh closer to 2.5 to 3 pounds.

Please browse our site, read the articles, read the hands-on reviews (there is a lot of historical info in our replica reviews), and browse the forums for all kinds of contextual info on swords and armour.

The quotes from sites that you reference are completely wrong and simply repeating myth and urban folklore. That info has no factual basis.

.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Rodolfo Martínez




Location: Argentina
Joined: 30 Nov 2006

Posts: 347

PostPosted: Thu 07 Dec, 2006 1:48 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thank you Nathan. Thats why i came to this site, to get accurate info about it. The examples given, like the 20 pound sword was to show how inacurate internet can be, even the same site said that the myth of the ultra heavy armor with the poleyn system to ride a knight on his horse, wasn,t true. And about the mercenary weapon or foot soldier only weapon, i think is not totally true. I find in a lot of sites that longswords were very popular weapons between knights, but almost nothing about two handers. Instead i found something about greatswords, but i don´t know the difference.
Can you explain me the difference between a greatsword and a two handed sword?

Thanks.

¨Sólo me desenvainarás por honor y nunca me envainarás sin gloria¨
View user's profile Send private message
Einar Drønnesund





Joined: 14 Sep 2003
Likes: 1 page

Posts: 201

PostPosted: Thu 07 Dec, 2006 2:52 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Rodolfo Martínez wrote:
Thank you Nathan. Thats why i came to this site, to get accurate info about it. The examples given, like the 20 pound sword was to show how inacurate internet can be, even the same site said that the myth of the ultra heavy armor with the poleyn system to ride a knight on his horse, wasn,t true. And about the mercenary weapon or foot soldier only weapon, i think is not totally true. I find in a lot of sites that longswords were very popular weapons between knights, but almost nothing about two handers. Instead i found something about greatswords, but i don´t know the difference.
Can you explain me the difference between a greatsword and a two handed sword?

Thanks.


The term greatsword is a bit of a grey area if I'm not mistaken. Many people have different opinions about what exactly the difference between a greatsword and a twohanded sword is. Personally, and you should take that with a grain of salt, I consider a greatsword to be a big longsword. Big enough to be impractical using only one hand. Something the size of a claymore, about 5 feet, I would consider to be a two handed sword. So for me, its a size thing. first longsword, then greatsword, then two handed sword. But I'm sure others will chime in and say I'm full of it. Happy I know many people consider greatsword and two handed sword to be the same.

By the way, today, I recieved a twohanded sword from Czech smith Vladimir Cervenka, and even for a wuss like me, it feels quite fast and manouverable. Its about 8,5 lbs, and 6 foot 2 inches long. In the hands of a big, strong landsknecht, who has trained for years using it, it would be a terrifyng weapon.
View user's profile Send private message
Stephen Hand




Location: Hobart, Australia
Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 226

PostPosted: Thu 07 Dec, 2006 4:57 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

In England a two handed sword was any sword designed to be used in two hands. Silver writing at the end of the 16th century said that a perfect two handed sword should have a blade the same length as a perfect single handed sword, which he said was 37-41", hardly a landsknecht two handed sword. The English two handed sword texts include many techniques where one hand is dropped off the grip to get extra reach, again, not something you'd do with a huge sword. So two handed sword was a term that meant a great many things to a great many people. We have a tendency to over categorise. We want to pigeon hole everything neatly. This isn't always possible and doesn't seem to be how our ancestors did things at all. Don't get too hung up trying to neatly categorise things more precisely than the people who used them did.

Cheers
Stephen

Stephen Hand
Editor, Spada, Spada II
Author of English Swordsmanship, Medieval Sword and Shield

Stoccata School of Defence
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Marc-Antoine Jean




Location: Canada
Joined: 10 Dec 2005

Posts: 71

PostPosted: Thu 07 Dec, 2006 8:30 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

simple....a two handed is a sword that requires both hands to be used efficiently. SO a longsword, in my opinion can be considered as a two handed sword.
Historically it apprears that the Swisses used real two handed swords around 1480. Maybe some were used before (burgundian war maybe). But in the Swiss federation the soldiers were citizen soldiers (no knight). Anyway, in the 15th century the war wasn't necessarely a knightly thing. Qui plus est, the longsword and the earlier two handers are mostly considered to be used as a duel weapon. The Swiss used that sword on battlefields but it appears that it is not a generality, I think.
On foot combat the sword was mainly a secondary weapon when the combat begins to be pretty close. Even if it is 5 fet long, a sword used with both hands is really deadly and effective in pretty close combat. But in the battlefield a sword is useless against armours....

so...we can talk about two handers for hours....and we'l still have something more to say
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Rodolfo Martínez




Location: Argentina
Joined: 30 Nov 2006

Posts: 347

PostPosted: Thu 07 Dec, 2006 8:55 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

So, no two handers for knight?
I saw armours with two handed swords ( Those italian two handers similar to William Wallace´s early claymore, but with siderings, not a zweihander) but i don´t remember if they were medieval. But i´m not sure. I saw landsknecht armours too, wielding flamberges. Even ther are XV century two handed sword, at leas in the second half. So, you say that two handers were only for mercenaries?

Take a look to the armour titled ¨Armatura seconda metà secolo XVI° (Was this a parade armour, or a mercenary armor? It´s a XVI century armour, but there were no knights but military order´s ones in that century)
http://www.deltin.net/photogallery.htm

¨Sólo me desenvainarás por honor y nunca me envainarás sin gloria¨
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Two handed swords
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum