Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Rockwell for Historic swords Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Matthew D M




Location: SouthEast Texas
Joined: 04 Aug 2004

Posts: 63

PostPosted: Fri 24 Mar, 2006 10:42 am    Post subject: Rockwell for Historic swords         Reply with quote

Does anyone know what the hardness was for historic pieces from the Renaissance period. For those who like to over analize (Wink) let's say a German Katzblager or comparable sword of top end quality for that period.
View user's profile AIM Address
Jay Barron




Location: Albany, NY
Joined: 18 Aug 2003

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 291

PostPosted: Fri 24 Mar, 2006 2:58 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I have read somewhere (probably on this or another sword collectors' site) that the RC hardness for many medieval/renaissance European swords was somewhere in the mid 40's.
Constant and true.


Last edited by Jay Barron on Fri 24 Mar, 2006 3:07 pm; edited 2 times in total
View user's profile Send private message
Wolfgang Armbruster





Joined: 03 Apr 2005

Posts: 322

PostPosted: Fri 24 Mar, 2006 3:02 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hmmm, I read that the average edge hardness for European swords of the late middle ages / early renaissance was around 50 - 55 Rockwell.
View user's profile Send private message
Bill Grandy
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

Location: Northern VA,USA
Joined: 25 Aug 2003
Reading list: 43 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 4,194

PostPosted: Fri 24 Mar, 2006 3:56 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I would be very suspicious of any claims to knowing the average hardness of medieval and renaissance swords. That would require a whole lot of data... I don't even think we have enough data to say the average size, let alone hardness... and even if we did, there's so much variance that an "average" doesn't really mean much.
HistoricalHandcrafts.com
-Inspired by History, Crafted by Hand


"For practice is better than artfulness. Your exercise can do well without artfulness, but artfulness is not much good without the exercise.” -anonymous 15th century fencing master, MS 3227a
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jared Smith




Location: Tennessee
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Likes: 1 page

Spotlight topics: 3
Posts: 1,532

PostPosted: Sat 25 Mar, 2006 4:39 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

It has been discussed in some previous forums. Most people seem to "recall having read somewhere" a figure in the 40's.

http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t...t=rockwell


It is probably worth noting that wootz Damascus and pattern welded swords were still made (in the minority) until fairly late. In 1923 a sword researcher named Zschokke tested 10 wootz and pattern welded swords from the collection of Henry Moser, now exhibited in the Berne Historical Museum in Switzerland. Those swords had Rockwell hardness between 23 to 37 when tested. A current researcher (more interested in recreating smelting of Damascus metal as opposed to swords) is Verhoven. You should be able to track down a range of factual research through references in his articles. In one of his articles that I have saved a copy of, he was not interested in plain steel, and so did not present his sources when he stated that modern (meaning historical sword steel that was not pattern welded or wootz) steel swords typically had Rockwell hardness near 40.

Absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence!
View user's profile Send private message
Bill Grandy
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

Location: Northern VA,USA
Joined: 25 Aug 2003
Reading list: 43 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 4,194

PostPosted: Sat 25 Mar, 2006 7:44 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Angus Trim in the other thread posted this:

Quote:
I've had a couple of conversations with the renowned Craig Johnson on this, and the average, is just that an average. Tested meaurements run from the mid 30's rc, to the mid 50's rc.


This is what I meant when I said that even if we had a large enough sample of tested swords to accurately give an average (which I doubt we do), there's still too much variation for an average to really mean anything.

Of course, Matthew asked specifically about katzbalgers, which would have a smaller pool to find an average from. The question there is whether anyone's actually tested something this specific.

HistoricalHandcrafts.com
-Inspired by History, Crafted by Hand


"For practice is better than artfulness. Your exercise can do well without artfulness, but artfulness is not much good without the exercise.” -anonymous 15th century fencing master, MS 3227a
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Craig Johnson
Industry Professional



Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Joined: 18 Aug 2003
Likes: 16 pages
Reading list: 20 books

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,422

PostPosted: Sat 25 Mar, 2006 9:34 am    Post subject: Hardness         Reply with quote

Hey Guys

I am unaware of any specific test of a Katzbalger blade at this time. I do have an article on hardness being finished up for nathan so I will address of bunch of stuff in that if you can be patient. There is an abysmally low number of well documented tests at this point in time. So we need to be judicious in how we apply the information and must also be clear about what the specific items tested can tell us. As in so much of life its the analysis that matters ;-)

Best
Craig
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Matthew D M




Location: SouthEast Texas
Joined: 04 Aug 2004

Posts: 63

PostPosted: Sat 25 Mar, 2006 11:45 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

It doesn't necessarily have to be a Katzblager, just a sword that could be used like that. I'm not interested in rapiers or estocs, etc.

Thanks for the answers everyone. I appreciate it.
View user's profile AIM Address
Bill Grandy
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

Location: Northern VA,USA
Joined: 25 Aug 2003
Reading list: 43 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 4,194

PostPosted: Sat 25 Mar, 2006 11:56 am    Post subject: Re: Hardness         Reply with quote

Craig Johnson wrote:
I do have an article on hardness being finished up for nathan so I will address of bunch of stuff in that if you can be patient.


Looking forward to that, Craig!

HistoricalHandcrafts.com
-Inspired by History, Crafted by Hand


"For practice is better than artfulness. Your exercise can do well without artfulness, but artfulness is not much good without the exercise.” -anonymous 15th century fencing master, MS 3227a
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Matthew D M




Location: SouthEast Texas
Joined: 04 Aug 2004

Posts: 63

PostPosted: Sat 25 Mar, 2006 12:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Hardness         Reply with quote

Craig Johnson wrote:
Hey Guys
I do have an article on hardness being finished up for nathan so I will address of bunch of stuff in that if you can be patient.

Best
Craig


Cool!
View user's profile AIM Address
Craig Johnson
Industry Professional



Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Joined: 18 Aug 2003
Likes: 16 pages
Reading list: 20 books

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,422

PostPosted: Sat 25 Mar, 2006 1:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Hardness         Reply with quote

Bill Grandy wrote:
Craig Johnson wrote:
I do have an article on hardness being finished up for nathan so I will address of bunch of stuff in that if you can be patient.


Looking forward to that, Craig!


Thanks Bill I have been trying to write a bit more lately and I have had several people request this topic.

By the way I will get your check in the mail for using that quote by Gus Laughing Out Loud Laughing Out Loud

Craig
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Angus Trim




Location: Seattle area
Joined: 26 Aug 2003

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 870

PostPosted: Sat 25 Mar, 2006 1:45 pm    Post subject: Re: Hardness         Reply with quote

Craig Johnson wrote:
Bill Grandy wrote:
Craig Johnson wrote:
I do have an article on hardness being finished up for nathan so I will address of bunch of stuff in that if you can be patient.


Looking forward to that, Craig!


Thanks Bill I have been trying to write a bit more lately and I have had several people request this topic.

By the way I will get your check in the mail for using that quote by Gus Laughing Out Loud Laughing Out Loud

Craig


Where's mine???

*g*

swords are fun
View user's profile Send private message
Jaroslav Petrina





Joined: 29 Sep 2005

Posts: 15

PostPosted: Sat 25 Mar, 2006 3:20 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

The question is what is an average hardness of a quality weapon.
Hardness in 30-40 is probably rather low considering what a sword have to withststand.
I would be also surprised if a wootz weapons have such a low hardness, as the nature of materiall itself allows extraordinery hardness with good toughness.

I have here a metalography of an old sword with a welded on edges and it has carbide particles in the edge and edge hardness of about 70 RC.
(This is late 10. cent sword, so out of our sample)

I would also be surprised if even the monosteel blade had the same hardness all through the blade.
When the blade is quenched I would think that thicker middle wont harden as much as edges which have higher temperature.

Jaroslav
View user's profile Send private message
Johan S. Moen




Location: Kristiansand, Norway
Joined: 26 Jan 2004

Posts: 259

PostPosted: Sat 25 Mar, 2006 4:41 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Jaroslav Petrina wrote:
The question is what is an average hardness of a quality weapon.
Hardness in 30-40 is probably rather low considering what a sword have to withststand.
I would be also surprised if a wootz weapons have such a low hardness, as the nature of materiall itself allows extraordinery hardness with good toughness.


I think we might have to disregard the specific type of steel and rather question the hardening process. Alas, I can not claim any extensive knowledge on that subject, but someone might?

Johan Schubert Moen
View user's profile Send private message
Jared Smith




Location: Tennessee
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Likes: 1 page

Spotlight topics: 3
Posts: 1,532

PostPosted: Sun 26 Mar, 2006 7:32 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

A more focused topic would be harndess of historical, homogenous, mild-carbon steel blades.

For a homogenous steel, hardness is a fairly direct indicator of tensile strength. However, the two do not have the same degree of proportionality. Doubling one does not correspond to doubling the other. Optimization or tradeoffs as hardness was varied over a histrorically credible range is something I would love to see explained. Explaining this probably depends on preferrence for flexibility and degree of combat hand shock that is considered acceptable.

The homogenous steel topic limitation would tend to leave out a signficant portion of early and middle medieval period swords. A small percentage of relatively modern pattern welded blades would also have to be excluded. Some other articles I have read stated that the popularity of pattern welding grew steadily between 9 to 13th century A.D. with potentially more than 30% of all swords being pattern welded approaching the 13th century. It started to decline shortly after this peak (due to more economical blast furnace forging of homogenous steel), but did not abruptly stop being practiced. As an overall blade structure, the reputation of these blades tended to be exaggerated to mythical proportions for flexing capability and toughness of cutting edge. It is possible to have RC 60-70 localized regions of material within the cutting edge, while the core of the blade has an RC 30 to 40. For styles of combat that emphasized slashing and cutting, this ultra sharp and durable cutting edge characteristic would offer advantages that can not be easily conveyed using a simple "average blade hardness" measure.

Absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence!
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Rockwell for Historic swords
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum