Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Albion First Gen Bone Grips Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
R. E. Oxley




Location: Georgia, USA
Joined: 07 Jul 2004

Posts: 67

PostPosted: Thu 16 Feb, 2006 5:15 pm    Post subject: Albion First Gen Bone Grips         Reply with quote

I am thinking of getting an Albion First Gen sword with a bone grip. I like the aesthetic qualities of bone but also know it is fairly difficult to work and can be fragile. I tried mounting a sax with a bone handle and abandoned the bone in favor of wood. I see the Next Gen Roman swords are fitted with grips of holly wood.

I was wondering if the bone used in Albion First Gen spatha and gladius grips has been stabilized in some way? I know this makes the bone more durable and less prone to breaking or chipping. If the bone in the First Gen grips is not stabilized, how much normal use and abuse could they be expected to take before cracking or breaking (say from a drop to the ground or frequent light to medium target cutting)?

This is in no way meant as a slight to Albion as I have owned several First & Next Gen swords and always found them to be of the best quality.

Any answers or opinions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Rob
View user's profile Send private message
Michael A White




Location: Missouri, USA
Joined: 07 Jun 2005

Posts: 26

PostPosted: Thu 16 Feb, 2006 5:44 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

You might also post this on www.romanarmy.comm. There RomanArmyTalk forum is all about things Roman.
View user's profile Send private message
Edward Hitchens




Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Likes: 1 page
Reading list: 9 books

Posts: 819

PostPosted: Thu 16 Feb, 2006 8:48 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I owned a FirstGen gladius for about four years and the bone grip never deteriorated in any way. It was beautiful aesthetically and was very secure on the sword.
"The whole art of government consists in the art of being honest." Thomas Jefferson
View user's profile Send private message
David Wilson




Location: In a van down by the river
Joined: 23 Aug 2003

Posts: 802

PostPosted: Thu 16 Feb, 2006 11:48 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Right, I have several first-gen Albion Roman swords, all with the bone grips (and a Celtic La Tene longsword, also with bone grip -- a very early model!) and all have held up fine. I don't do much cutting with them anymore, only dry handling ("air cutting"), but there's never been a thought in my mind that there would be a problem. Hasn't even been much discoloration, either!

There are bone grips/hilt components that date to Roman times in museums. They've held up okay for a couple thousand years....

David K. Wilson, Jr.
Laird of Glencoe

Now available on Amazon: Franklin Posner's "Suburban Vampire: A Tale of the Human Condition -- With Vampires" https://www.amazon.com/dp/B072N7Y591
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
R. E. Oxley




Location: Georgia, USA
Joined: 07 Jul 2004

Posts: 67

PostPosted: Fri 17 Feb, 2006 8:15 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thanks for the replies and information, gentlemen.

It might be that Albion sealed the bone on First Gen grips to help lessen the possibility of breakage. That would help explain the good longevity of the material.

Patrick, yes it does seem we have several surviving examples of bone grips from the Roman Era. Good point, indeed. However, many things that would be very likely to break easily (pottery, etc.) have been found perfectly intact in archaeological sites. Wink

However, having worked with bone and knowing that it can be prone to fracture (pardon the pun), I would still like to know if Albion sealed or stabilized the bone on the First Gen grips. If bone is a strong grip material, then why are the current Next Gen Roman swords fitted with wood grips? I realize it may be due to economic factors or design limitations. I am just curious. Big Grin
View user's profile Send private message
Matt G




Location: Bay Area, California
Joined: 14 Feb 2004
Likes: 1 page
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 73

PostPosted: Fri 17 Feb, 2006 9:42 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Rob,

You can read more about Albion's decision to use Holly as the grip material in this thread:
http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t...mp;start=0

Here are some quotes from the above mentioned thread.

Howard Waddell wrote:
Quote:
Consistency is the main reason -- it is getting harder and harder to find bleached cowbone in the smaller diameters that we need (with no flaws).

Holly is historically accurate and we can get them dead-on every time.


Peter Johnsson wrote:
Quote:
As has been noted, the grips are now holly and not bone. Itīs as Howy said a matter of availability and workability of the bone. There is also a health issue.

"Speak what you think today in words as hard as cannon-balls and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."

Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803 - 1882)
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Peter Johnsson
Industry Professional



Location: Storvreta, Sweden
Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 3
Posts: 1,757

PostPosted: Sat 18 Feb, 2006 3:51 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

R. E. Oxley wrote:
...However, having worked with bone and knowing that it can be prone to fracture (pardon the pun), I would still like to know if Albion sealed or stabilized the bone on the First Gen grips. If bone is a strong grip material, then why are the current Next Gen Roman swords fitted with wood grips? I realize it may be due to economic factors or design limitations. I am just curious. Big Grin



Hey Rob,

As you have noted yourself, bone can be a treacherous material: splintering or cracking if subjected to heat or stress.

The bone grips Albion osed to use were not treated.

You need good material, that is blemish free and of perfect size. For production of one on one basis (cusotm projects) this can be an alternative even if you have to search with some dedication to find suitable material.

For a line of popular swords the sitution is different.
Working with bone creates large amount of bone dust.
This is hazardous, as it will cling to your lungs in a very nasty way. No good at all, in fact.

Wood grips on roman swords were very common.

That is why I chose that route for the design of the new roman swords.

If you want to work with bone yorself, be sure to use adequate face mask.
Work slowly and avoid overheating of the bone. Do not stress the material with oversized pins/tangs or undersized holes.

Best way to get material might be to go to a slaughterhouse and ask to get cow bone of suitable size.

Best
Peter
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
R. E. Oxley




Location: Georgia, USA
Joined: 07 Jul 2004

Posts: 67

PostPosted: Wed 22 Feb, 2006 4:27 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thanks for the link, Matt. Good information there. I should remember that the search function is my friend! Wink

Peter, thank you for your reply. Your explanation regarding large production difficulties when using bone grips makes perfect sense. I assumed it was something like that but wanted to hear it from an expert involved with Albion production and design.

I am also well aware of the serious health risks associated with working bone. Thanks for posting that information as everyone should know of the possible respiratory damage if proper precautions are not observed.

Best,

Rob Happy
View user's profile Send private message
Jean Thibodeau




Location: Montreal,Quebec,Canada
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Likes: 50 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 5
Posts: 8,310

PostPosted: Wed 22 Feb, 2006 5:06 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Peter;

Bone dust ? Is the danger mostly when using power tools grinding or sanding bone producing a lot of airborne dust ?

If sanding by hand there should be lest dust in the air but is it still dangerous but less so ? I would imagine that someone working on one project without power tools would be in less danger than somebody working bone as a job 8 hours a day 5 days a week for years at a time: Even if a small exposure wouldn't harm a hobbiest ( much ) constant exposure would add a cumulative risk.

Probably a good idea to not take any chances and use a mask anyway?

I remember sanding a lot of Rosewood years ago and being coated with dust: I had a bad allergic reaction that I blamed at the time on some anti- itch medication I was using at the time with Benzocain in it ! Not medically confirmed though, just that the doctor I saw also assumed the same thing I did that the Benzocain was the problem, never thought of mentioning working rosewood.

I suspect now that it might have been the Rosewood dust instead: I had worked some rosewood before with hand tools without a problem but the dust clouds produced by machine sanding was another story.

This was years ( decades ago ) and at the time had no idea that some tropical woods can be toxic.

You can easily give up your freedom. You have to fight hard to get it back!
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Albion First Gen Bone Grips
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum