Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > How much more difficult is it to move while wearing Armour? Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
John A. Brown





Joined: 19 Feb 2015

Posts: 23

PostPosted: Mon 10 Apr, 2017 8:48 pm    Post subject: How much more difficult is it to move while wearing Armour?         Reply with quote

There's two extremes I notice when it comes to armour. There is the one extreme where armour is portrayed as being bulky and hard to move in such as the knights armour. And there is the other extreme where since armour was made to fit person for persona and to be distributed evenly so that even a 100lb armour would not feel heavy and be so light that you can do cartwheels, hand stands, jumps, run, and even fancy acrobatics. That armour is so light that someone who's not conditioned would feel its like wearing a T-Shirt.

So when I found my sister's weighted vest that totals to about 20 lbs, I decided to test it out. At first it did not feel heavy at all and it felt so light I can jump around it and even walk 2 miles without feeling exhausted. So I thought real armour must be as light as the other extreme is, so l thought plate armour was lighter than a shirt.

However once I started crouching and doing other prone movements to test swordsmanship and aerobics I began to feel pressure. In fact I was surprised as hell how tired I got just doing squats and practising low level attacks. In addition when I tested running, it suddenly felt so heavy. Not as heavy as Hollywood portrays mind you but I began to wonder if some of the tests such as the link below had validity.

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-14204717

As I was finishing my first mile and I reread the above article while I was resting, everything was so spot on.

Also trying to do high level acrobatics such as jumping over hurdles in a track field and some of those fancy gymnastics was almost impossible.

So it makes me wonder how wearing an armour would be like. I know its a running vest I used that had pockets filled with metal bars that totaled 20lbs, far less than a typical breastplate so its a different tool. In addition I'm not exactly a nerdy waste as I lift weights enough that I can curl 2 sets of 50 lbs dumbells casually and benchpressing a barbell with 50 extra weights on both side for 100 reps ain't hard. So does that explain why wearing the vest was initially not difficult?

I am so curious how armour felt like but don't have money right now to buy it so I ask people with experience here!
View user's profile Send private message
Dan Howard




Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
Joined: 08 Dec 2004

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 3,636

PostPosted: Mon 10 Apr, 2017 9:08 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

It really depends on the armour and how much of the body it covers. Armour that only covers your chest is not inhibiting at all. Armour that covers your entire body is more restrictive. IMO it largely depends on how well the armour fits your limbs and articulates at the joints.
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen and Sword Books
View user's profile Send private message
Nat Lamb




Location: Melbourne, Australia
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Likes: 1 page

Posts: 385

PostPosted: Mon 10 Apr, 2017 9:14 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Others far more knowledgeable than I will chime in soon enough, but just my thoughts:
There is a big difference between middle/long distance running and the "difficulty" of moving in armour. Armour was designed to protect people engaging in combat from the weapons of their opponents, not to give marathon runners a bit of extra protection against mountain lions. Sure it will be more restrictive than a t-shirt, but the types of movements you want to be able to do, that the armour is designed to impede as little as possible are those involved in combat from the time period the armour is from.
Also, 100 pounds for a full harness and 20 pounds for a breastplate are both ridiculously heavy for "standard" armours. Maybe specialised jousting harnesses for heads of state that didn't have male heirs, but not normal armours.
View user's profile Send private message
Michael B.
Industry Professional



Location: Seattle, WA
Joined: 18 Oct 2007

Posts: 367

PostPosted: Mon 10 Apr, 2017 9:57 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

At the peak of my training in my full suit of armor, I could run for a good distance, do pushups, tuck and rolls, and had good mobility (even did a swimming test). If the armor is made for you and is suspended correctly you should be able to move well in it especially if you train and wear it a lot. I've clocked 14 hours staight strapped in and have hiked in the mountains in full kit.
www.facebook.com/bearmountainforge2
Michael Bergstrom
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bram Verbeek





Joined: 27 Mar 2007

Posts: 217

PostPosted: Mon 10 Apr, 2017 10:55 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

There are indeed two extremes:

Badly made armour that film makers want to have some drawback, ie lesser maneuverability.

People that have well fitted armour, are trained in its use and want to show mobility is not that much impacted.

but both these cases do not matter for your case, your case is about strength and stamina.

You found yourself with very little limits in how you could move but you're still heavier, and have not yet trained the muscle neccesary to compensate. Training or not, it will tire you faster than not wearing armour, you simply have to move more weight. Running with a mail shirt on (closest equivalent) is also different from running without one. I try to keep my center of mass much more level when running with the weight on.
View user's profile Send private message
Matthew Amt




Location: Laurel, MD, USA
Joined: 17 Sep 2003

Posts: 1,456

PostPosted: Tue 11 Apr, 2017 6:15 am    Post subject: Re: How much more difficult is it to move while wearing Armo         Reply with quote

John A. Brown wrote:
There's two extremes I notice when it comes to armour. There is the one extreme where armour is portrayed as being bulky and hard to move in such as the knights armour. And there is the other extreme where since armour was made to fit person for persona and to be distributed evenly so that even a 100lb armour would not feel heavy and be so light that you can do cartwheels, hand stands, jumps, run, and even fancy acrobatics. That armour is so light that someone who's not conditioned would feel its like wearing a T-Shirt.


I would say both extremes are wrong (as extremes often are!). "Bulky" is of course a very subjective term, and we're also talking about a HUGE range of variables. But in general, if any armor is "hard to move in", it's probably designed for an activity that does not require a lot of movement, such as jousting. Even full steel plate armor (e.g., Gothic or Milanese) is not hard to move it because of its extensive articulation. However it IS weight, and ANYone is going to get tired more quickly while wearing it than they would if they were not.

Armor that weighed 100 pounds was never going to feel light, no matter how well it fit or how well-articulated and distributed it was. Of course, that's either specialized jousting armor, or something bulletproof from the Renaissance, and the wearers would all have agreed that it was HEAVY. No one can strap that much weight to their body and just ignore it.

As with your questions about sword weights, this is most likely just another example of not being used to something you haven't done before. Plus you shouldn't get the idea that just because someone can do a cartwheel in full plate means that he isn't putting a LOT more effort into that than a gymnast in a leotard. Moving mass means more energy used, simple as that. Sure, you'll get better as you get used to it, but the simply physics remain.

Matthew
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Martin Fischer




Location: Cologne, Germany
Joined: 21 Jul 2007

Posts: 45

PostPosted: Tue 11 Apr, 2017 7:04 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

... look at this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAzI1UvlQqw
View user's profile Send private message
Benjamin H. Abbott




Location: New Mexico
Joined: 28 Feb 2004

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,248

PostPosted: Tue 11 Apr, 2017 8:37 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Great video, thanks for sharing! It does should how much a heavy load affects speed in difficult terrain. I can see why 16th-century arquebusiers, expected to skirmish in rough terrain, often tried to travel light, apparently sometimes even declining to wear swords.
View user's profile Send private message
Chris Friede




Location: Austin
Joined: 15 Mar 2014

Posts: 39

PostPosted: Thu 13 Apr, 2017 1:36 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

A lot depends on the type of armor as well. I do medieval reenactment and wear a chain hauberk, up to 8 hours a day. If properly belted, it isn't terrible--my helmet is the worst part. But the weight does sap your energy. I can mount a horse, fight, etc. But getting up from prone and seated is tougher. In properly fitted plate, those activities are much easier.
View user's profile Send private message
Dan Howard




Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
Joined: 08 Dec 2004

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 3,636

PostPosted: Thu 13 Apr, 2017 2:45 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Most of the mail today isn't fitted to the wearer. In the past it often was. You'll find that it would be a lot easier to move in if it was tailored for you, Properly-fitted mail feels like a second skin made from steel.
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen and Sword Books
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Moore




Location: East backwoods-assed Texas
Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Likes: 6 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 2,294

PostPosted: Thu 13 Apr, 2017 4:43 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I agree with that totally, Dan. I lucked out and got a haubergon that looks(and feels) like it was painted on me, except a bit of slack in the lower sleeves. Total mobility. Wink All of my plate armor is 'off the shelf', but was all selected very carefully to the closest possible sizes for my particular frame---much to the annoyance of some sellers customer service people. Laughing Out Loud I find it to be about as close to custom-made as I can get on my budget. As far as the question---"How much more difficult is it......"---I plan on wearing it to Scarborough Fair Ren-Fest...in Texas heat...this weekend. I'll tell y'all when/if I make it back alive. Laughing Out Loud ....McM
''Life is like a box of chocolates...'' --- F. Gump
View user's profile Send private message
Lafayette C Curtis




Location: Indonesia
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Reading list: 7 books

Posts: 2,698

PostPosted: Tue 18 Apr, 2017 10:41 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Daniel Jaquet is pretty much the leading source on this these days. Apart from the Obstacle Run in Armour video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAzI1UvlQqw ), there are a couple more where he addresses mobility or the lack thereof in armour:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCvOC2VwDc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-bnM5SuQkI

And a detailed interview with him by Rob Runacres and Hans Jornlind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnI_nfb4HyY
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > How much more difficult is it to move while wearing Armour?
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum