Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search


myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term.
Last 10 Donors: Daniel Sullivan, Anonymous, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors)

Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Oakeshott XVIIIc Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Nils Lindqvist




Location: Sweden
Joined: 12 Oct 2015
Likes: 1 page

Posts: 9

PostPosted: Thu 15 Oct, 2015 7:33 am    Post subject: Oakeshott XVIIIc         Reply with quote

Hi,

I'm trying to find as much information about type XVIIIc as possible and thought that maybe you guys could help me out. I've had a look at the XVIII entry in the features section as well as done a search in the forum for information but it would be nice to find some more information, especially data such as weight, length, PoB, etc., as well as images of fittings, for historic examples.

Thanks
View user's profile Send private message
Luka Borscak




Location: Croatia
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Likes: 7 pages

Posts: 2,307

PostPosted: Thu 15 Oct, 2015 1:45 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Search for Alexandria, both real XVIIIc swords from Alexandria Arsenal and Albion Alexandria sword, you will find a lot of useful info.
View user's profile Send private message
Nils Lindqvist




Location: Sweden
Joined: 12 Oct 2015
Likes: 1 page

Posts: 9

PostPosted: Fri 16 Oct, 2015 12:15 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thanks. It seems they are sometimes labeld as type XVa, but I suppose the definition is somewhat fluid.
Do you (or anyone else) know if the XVIIIc illustration (by Peter Johnsson) in Albions Oakeshott typology is based on a historical example? I really like the fittings on it.
View user's profile Send private message
James Moore





Joined: 27 Jan 2011

Posts: 61

PostPosted: Sat 17 Oct, 2015 7:02 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Nils Lindqvist wrote:
Thanks. It seems they are sometimes labeld as type XVa, but I suppose the definition is somewhat fluid.
Do you (or anyone else) know if the XVIIIc illustration (by Peter Johnsson) in Albions Oakeshott typology is based on a historical example? I really like the fittings on it.


generally, XVa are narrower (maybe 50mm wide on average for a broad one) and straighter edges . while XVIIIc's should be much broader (70+mm isnt unheard of), and have a little more of an arc in the edge.


Here's one with dimensions, to start you off on the search:

http://www.philamuseum.org/collections/perman...1349914|41
View user's profile Send private message
Nils Lindqvist




Location: Sweden
Joined: 12 Oct 2015
Likes: 1 page

Posts: 9

PostPosted: Sun 18 Oct, 2015 4:57 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thanks. That one looks really nice and also more usable with one hand than the Alexandria one.
View user's profile Send private message
Till J. Lodemann





Joined: 15 Jan 2007

Posts: 97

PostPosted: Fri 23 Oct, 2015 11:14 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hei Nils, this blade type is impressive, isn't it? I asked a similar question some years ago, here's the thread: http://myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=23664&highlight=
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Oakeshott XVIIIc
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum