Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search


myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term.
Last 10 Donors: Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors)

Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Tinker Wakefield Sword Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin


myArmoury Admin

PostPosted: Thu 30 Dec, 2004 1:11 pm    Post subject: Tinker Wakefield Sword         Reply with quote

This sword, made by Michael "Tinker" Pearce in 2000 was recently featured in a post by Adrian Ko on Sword Forum. After seeing the photo posted, a member here asked if I had any additional photos of that sword, knowing that it was in my procession for awhile. As it turns out, I had actually done a full photo-shoot. I'm unable to post on SFI, so I'll share the photos I took with you here.







As Adrian mentions, this is a very lively sword. It's quite "handy" in that its dynamic properties are such that the sword is able to be used to make authoritative cuts while having enough agility for accurate tip-cuts and a quick recovery. One thing I really loved about this sword was that it didn't subscribe to the modern belief that these types of swords (falchions, messers, etc.) are meant to be overly-heavy cleavers with a lot of mass. Many of them throughout history were actually quite light and lively, as this example by Tinker is. Based on the excellent dynamics, I would have bought this sword for my own collection, but a few factors, particularly choices for fit and finish, kept me from buying it.

I feel the entire hilt is a bit over-sized, but not outside of reason. This was just a personal preference. I didn't care for the choice of polished wood for the grip: I would have preferred the grip to either be of a more historical nature with leather and cord, for example, or have the bare wood be scales over the tang with rivets in a grossemesser fashion. A pin is used on the "pommel" to secure the sword together and solder was used in the junction between blade and cross-guard. These stood out to me as looking too much like modern construction methods. The solder is a bit sloppy as well. Additionally, the fuller ends in a real abrupt way before hitting the cross-guard and that issue stood out too much for me.

The grinding on the blade is excellent. The edges are blended masterfully and the false edge, probably my favorite part of this whole piece, is absolutely perfect. The blade's bevels, spine, edge, and other details are some of the most crisp I've seen of Tinker's work and I liked that fact quite a bit. The way in which the fuller blends out at the tip end is quite well done, too.

Overall, I liked this sword quite a bit. As I mentioned, the handling characteristics are excellent but I felt it fell short of my own needs in the fit, finish, and history departments. It had too many details reminescent of modern construction for my tastes. This sword is some 4-5 years old now, and Tinker's work has no doubt evolved since then.

.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Tinker Wakefield Sword
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum