Author |
Message |
Vincent C
Location: Northern VA Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Posts: 84
|
Posted: Sun 13 May, 2012 6:55 pm Post subject: 4-quillioned two-handed claymore, blade information. |
|
|
The sword I'm referring to is this one from the Museum of Scotland in Edinburgh.
I have little interest in the the hilt of this sword. I prefer the humor of filling in the blanks there myself.
I am interested in the blade.
Are there any known dimensions and date for this blade? I assume it's German import. If so, is this a standard blade model that was exported, and the dimensions known based off of that?
I'm mostly wondering if the blade was actually intended to be used in combat, it looks more spry than some of the other diamond cross-sectioned claymores I've seen.
Honor, compassion, knowledge.
|
|
|
|
Neil Melville
|
Posted: Tue 15 May, 2012 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Vincent,
If only I had logged on Sunday evening! I was in the Nat. Museum yesterday and could have estimated some dimensions for you. However, I can tell you that the blade of the 4-quilloned sword (no. L 1977.5) is most likely a standard German export, 5 inch ricasso with 2 narrow fullers at the edges of the ricasso + a longer central fuller for another 5 inches or so then it becomes very flattened diamond section. No visible (through the glass case) marks but it is very heavily patinated, so much that none would be visible anyway. Rounded (worn/corroded?) tip. Could certainly have been a fighting blade, though the hilt suggests 'parade - ceremony'. It is commonly known as the 'Hawthornden Claymore'. If I find any more info I'll post it.
Neil
N Melville
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|