Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search


myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term.
Last 10 Donors: Daniel Sullivan, Anonymous, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors)

Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > Do the newer Lutel blades have good distal taper Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Karl Knisley




PostPosted: Fri 23 Sep, 2011 10:02 am    Post subject: Do the newer Lutel blades have good distal taper         Reply with quote

Hello
I was wondering ,if anyone had a newer made, Lutel,and if the distal taper was good,on the blade?And a overall
opinion,of the bade,would be appreciated.
View user's profile Send private message
Emil Andersson




Location: Sweden
Joined: 17 Oct 2010

Posts: 136

PostPosted: Fri 23 Sep, 2011 1:58 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I've just recently ordered one of their largest two-handed swords, so I'm anticipatingly waiting to find this out for myself as well. Judging by the pictures of it, though, the blade does have a reasonable amount of distal tapering.
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > Do the newer Lutel blades have good distal taper
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum