| myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term. Last 10 Donors: Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors) |
Author |
Message |
U. M. Tønner
Location: Denmark Joined: 26 Apr 2008
Posts: 18
|
Posted: Tue 19 May, 2009 1:46 am Post subject: Viking Mail |
|
|
While I know this probably have been discussed before, I couldnt quite find it so I thought id ask again.
Which type of chainmail would be most appropriate for a (rather wealthy) viking warrior?
Im thinking of making a shirt from alternating rows of riveted and solid flat profiled rings as bought at this page from GDFB
However I'm not sure if this style is the best for a viking or if I should go for all riveted and/or a round profile.
Hope you can help.
*Editted subject for clarity
Last edited by U. M. Tønner on Tue 19 May, 2009 3:12 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
Artis Aboltins
|
Posted: Tue 19 May, 2009 2:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, first off, proper term would be a mail, not chainmail
Also, I belive that all finds apropriate to the "viking age" so far have been of links made of round wire, not flattened.
Last edited by Artis Aboltins on Tue 19 May, 2009 5:06 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
Randall Moffett
|
Posted: Tue 19 May, 2009 3:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think that is right. Maybe Eric or Dan can chime in with more detail?
RPM.
|
|
|
|
Artis Aboltins
|
Posted: Tue 19 May, 2009 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, sadly there is not much in the way of whole mail shirts surviving from the Viking age - Gjermondbu find is, probably, most famous of those. One more detail that has already been discussed in another threrad is that rivets for this mail also should be round, not triangular ones, and that shirt ought to be tailored to the wearer, not a simple T-shirt affair.
|
|
|
|
U. M. Tønner
Location: Denmark Joined: 26 Apr 2008
Posts: 18
|
Posted: Tue 19 May, 2009 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for the replies so far.
I was aware that the rivets should be round and the shirt tailored Just wasn't sure about the profile of the rings and if alternating rows were solid rings.
|
|
|
|
R D Moore
|
Posted: Tue 19 May, 2009 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
William R. Short's new book: "Viking Weapons and Tactics" is now available through this forums link to Amazon and contains some photos of extant maile examples from the viking era. They clearly show alternating rows of flat riveted and ring links. The ring links may have been punched from a sheet of plate. I'm at work without my copy so I can't be more specific, but the book seems to be a great resource.
Home now. The title is actually "Viking Weapons and Combat Techniques." And the piece of maile was found in Gjermundbu. It also states that Slag intrusions in the iron of the solid rings indicate they were punched from sheet metal.
"No man is entitled to the blessings of freedom unless he be vigilant in its preservation" ...Gen. Douglas Macarthur
|
|
|
|
Dan Howard
|
Posted: Wed 20 May, 2009 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Gjermundbu riveted links look rounded to me though I've only seen photos, not the original.
|
|
|
|
Justin B.
|
Posted: Wed 20 May, 2009 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Most everything I could contribute here has been covered (flat-section solid rings punched from a sheet and sound-second riveted rings using round-headed pin rivets) except for ring size. They were ridiculously small, for the most part (I believe there have been a could Vendel era finds with relatively huige ring sizes) by modern standards... 6mm rings would be the closest modern size that I think you could get to the Gjermundbu find.
Also on the subject of tailoring, it seems to me that the style during the Viking era was to wear maille shirts quite short, based on my (admittedly limited) knowledge of surviving accounts. I'm not sure when (or why) they started to lengthen, but I'd wager that it had a lot to do with the falling cost of iron that made swords more common battlefield items.
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|