Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > short magazine lee enfield mkIII Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next 
Author Message
Gordon Frye




Location: Kingston, Washington
Joined: 20 Apr 2004
Reading list: 15 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 1,191

PostPosted: Mon 15 Oct, 2007 8:25 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Etienne:

I agree with Jean that the SMLE is a GREAT rifle, and in my opinion the best of the military bolt actions as a military rifle. Perhaps not as accurate nor as strong as the Mausers, but easier to keep clean and a heck of a lot faster to manipulate. Coming with a 10-round magazine, it's a lot faster to "unload" than a Mauser-style with it's 5-round magazine. I do find the stripper clips of the Lee to be a bit more of a challenge than the Mauser's stripper clips, especially in making sure that no rims overlap the wrong way, but other than that it's a very fine rifle (with the caviat that it's in good shape, that is).

I have a couple of nice old Lee's, both are made by BSA in 1915 and both shoot very well. One was sadly butchered by some amature gunsmith years ago trying to "sporterize" it, but lucky for me it is still quite sound otherwise. Both are reasonably accurate, and both have very, very smooth fast actions. And I find the SMLE Mk III*'s to be much smoother, and therefore faster than the WWII No.4MkI's, though the later's sights are better. (Interestingly enough, though members of the Empire/Commonwealth, neither India nor Australia ever adopted the No. 4 series of rifles, but stuck by their tried and true SMLE's until they were replaced by the FAL in the late-1950's/early-1960's. Fine rifles, those old SMLE's are!)

At any rate, per having the headspace checked, it's a very good idea, though it's not nearly as critical on a rifle such as the SMLE firing a rimmed case as it would be with a Mauser-style rifle firing a rimless case. None the less, I'd have it done prior to shooting. As Linn says, much better to err on the side of caution and have you do this than for us to read of your misfortune due to our poor advice! The good news is that if you find an older gunsmith around, he's probably got all of the tools for checking the headspace and doing other gauging on the rifle, as the SMLE was a very popular rifle in Canada from the 1920's through at least until the 1980's, and probably still is to some degree, since it was the standard service rifle of the Canadian Forces for over 50 years.

Good luck on this, and it's good to see Canadian lads taking up shooting!

Cheers!

Gordon

"After God, we owe our victory to our Horses"
Gonsalo Jimenez de Quesada
http://www.renaissancesoldier.com/
http://historypundit.blogspot.com/
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Nick Trueman





Joined: 27 Mar 2006

Posts: 246

PostPosted: Tue 16 Oct, 2007 12:21 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Etienne

Sorry i'm late on this one. Can you post some photos of your rifle? Especially markings and stamps, and a overall pic?
I can tell you lots if you send me pics.

Heres my favorite, BSA No1 MkIII all matched numbers. Made in 1916, still shoot it ,just to give the .22 shooters a headache.

I havent had a chance to read all the replies but whatever you do. do not fire X military .303 rnds through your rifle! Mk7 ammunition which is the most common, was made for the no4 mk1 etc and Vickers machine guns.... ww1 SMLES were
not made to handle the pressures of this cartridge.
Though towards the end of the war they changed this so all .303 ammo could be used. Check to see if there is a marking
on your barrel labeled HV ( high velocity ). It should be located next to the fore end adjustable sight. Then you can use it but I dont recommend it anyway.


Nick



 Attachment: 109.71 KB
[ Download ]
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Trueman





Joined: 27 Mar 2006

Posts: 246

PostPosted: Tue 16 Oct, 2007 12:29 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

9 out 10

Because the cartridge was rimmed, a inexperienced soldier or civilian will jam it under pressure!

10 out of 10 as its was the best made military bolt action made for its time, and because Im biased. Nothing came close until the M1 Garand came about.

N
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Trueman





Joined: 27 Mar 2006

Posts: 246

PostPosted: Tue 16 Oct, 2007 12:45 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Safety

Take it to a gunsmith who knows about SMLE style safety's and action.

But this test you can do your self

Cock the rifle ( make sure the barrel is clear off any bullets)

release the safety to safe position.

The trigger should still be able to move freely, BUT if when you depress the trigger it fires, then your safety lug needs replacing. This is easy for a gunsmith, Ive done my own.

If it doesnt fire the rifle, then this is normal. If the safety is working properly you wont be able to open the bolt/action. it will lock.

Hope this helps.

Nick
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Trueman





Joined: 27 Mar 2006

Posts: 246

PostPosted: Tue 16 Oct, 2007 6:00 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

MMMM

5 Rnd magazine?. This is odd for a 1918 No1 MkIII*. Ok if you cant send pics of the rifle describe it. Does it look like the one I posted earlier?
When you lift the bolt tell me what is written on the metal band, and tell me if there is a crown present?
Also on the bolt arm just behind the knob, what is the number stamped there? Also where the barrel is exposed and the bullet goes in ( Breech, knox form ), what number is stamped there? And any other funny numbers or letters in that area.

Cheers

Nick
View user's profile Send private message
Etienne Hamel




Location: Granby (QC) canada
Joined: 09 Sep 2006

Posts: 443

PostPosted: Tue 16 Oct, 2007 7:10 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Like i said earlier i cant have pics of it and if you want me to describe it you will be a little surprised but anyway...

first yes it looks like the one you sent but the front sight has been removed, the "wooden upper caps" too, the sight that you "lift" is also not there and the cleaning rod is not there as well (so there is not garnments) but it's working well and i wish i could restore it...

and i don't know well about the magazine because it is as big as yours but my grand father said it is for 5 rounds only and i don't know how to test its capacity (is it with real bullets or...)
View user's profile Send private message
Gordon Frye




Location: Kingston, Washington
Joined: 20 Apr 2004
Reading list: 15 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 1,191

PostPosted: Tue 16 Oct, 2007 9:33 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

It's possible that there has been a block put into the magazine to ensure that only five rounds can be loaded into it in order to fulfill hunting regulations. I'm not sure about Canada, but in most states in the US, hunting regs require that your magazine hold five rounds or less. Some states don't require this, others do, and if Quebec required this then that would explain why it only holds five rounds at present. It's easy enough to fix, you order a new magazine and save the old one for hunting, if you ever do that with the rifle.

Cheers!

Gordon

"After God, we owe our victory to our Horses"
Gonsalo Jimenez de Quesada
http://www.renaissancesoldier.com/
http://historypundit.blogspot.com/
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Nick Trueman





Joined: 27 Mar 2006

Posts: 246

PostPosted: Wed 17 Oct, 2007 6:34 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Etienne

Ok sounds like your rifle may have been sporterized? Basically people get X military rifles and remove parts of the stock and in some cases shorten the barrel. They do this to lighten the rifle. But very strange that they have removed the sights?

When you get a chance measure the length of the barrel, and I will tell you if its worth restoring.

This is only a guess as there is no way to tell without a photo.

Just out of curiosity does your rifle look like this?




Etienne Hamel wrote:
Like i said earlier i cant have pics of it and if you want me to describe it you will be a little surprised but anyway...

first yes it looks like the one you sent but the front sight has been removed, the "wooden upper caps" too, the sight that you "lift" is also not there and the cleaning rod is not there as well (so there is not garnments) but it's working well and i wish i could restore it...

and i don't know well about the magazine because it is as big as yours but my grand father said it is for 5 rounds only and i don't know how to test its capacity (is it with real bullets or...)



 Attachment: 23.54 KB
lee pics (19).jpg

View user's profile Send private message
Etienne Hamel




Location: Granby (QC) canada
Joined: 09 Sep 2006

Posts: 443

PostPosted: Wed 17 Oct, 2007 7:18 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

there is something on mines that you doesn't have on yours. i don't have your type of back sight but my kind is a little more "big" and near the bolt (like over it). and the barrel seems just right because the end of it is approximately 45 or 50 cm long after the hand grip not the handle (i'm not familiarized with these therms Laughing Out Loud ).
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Trueman





Joined: 27 Mar 2006

Posts: 246

PostPosted: Wed 17 Oct, 2007 7:32 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

like this?


 Attachment: 16.09 KB
image009.jpg

View user's profile Send private message
Etienne Hamel




Location: Granby (QC) canada
Joined: 09 Sep 2006

Posts: 443

PostPosted: Wed 17 Oct, 2007 9:51 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

nope smaller than that like a small bridge on the bolt.
View user's profile Send private message
Etienne Hamel




Location: Granby (QC) canada
Joined: 09 Sep 2006

Posts: 443

PostPosted: Wed 17 Oct, 2007 9:53 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

like this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:SMLE_Mk_III.jpg
View user's profile Send private message
Jean Thibodeau




Location: Montreal,Quebec,Canada
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Likes: 50 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 5
Posts: 8,310

PostPosted: Wed 17 Oct, 2007 11:59 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Etienne Hamel wrote:
like this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:SMLE_Mk_III.jpg


On the wiki image the rear site is on the barrel and not over the bolt ? Just curious as the info seems contradictory ?
( Unless, I'm misreading something ?).

You can easily give up your freedom. You have to fight hard to get it back!
View user's profile Send private message
Shayan G





Joined: 26 Sep 2006

Posts: 140

PostPosted: Wed 17 Oct, 2007 1:33 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Mildly off-topic but regarding the use of antique Enfields, I've ready from many different firsthand accounts that many Afghan fedayeen used decades-old Enfields to great effect as sharpshooters' weapons against the Russians. These weapons were almost a century old by then, and still functioned well enough to be used in combat...astounding!

That said, as those with more experience have already stated above, DEFINITELY get this one checked out by an experienced gunsmith before you even consider using it, and get extensive firearm safety training as well.

View user's profile Send private message
Lin Robinson




Location: NC
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Likes: 6 pages
Reading list: 6 books

Posts: 1,241

PostPosted: Wed 17 Oct, 2007 1:57 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Shayan G wrote:
Mildly off-topic but regarding the use of antique Enfields, I've ready from many different firsthand accounts that many Afghan fedayeen used decades-old Enfields to great effect as sharpshooters' weapons against the Russians. These weapons were almost a century old by then, and still functioned well enough to be used in combat...astounding!

That said, as those with more experience have already stated above, DEFINITELY get this one checked out by an experienced gunsmith before you even consider using it, and get extensive firearm safety training as well.



There is a cottage industry of sorts in the northwest frontier of Pakistan which turns out copies of all sorts of old weapons, including Enfields. They make a passable Sten gun as well. There are, almost certainly, antique rifles in use as well, but with all the AKMs the Soviets lost during their expedition, they appear to be the weapon of choice. The Afghans also managed to get their hands a lot of Russian Dragunov sniper rifles, but the Enfield, if properly scoped and sighted, is probably a better choice.

Lin Robinson

"The best thing in life is to crush your enemies, see them driven before you and hear the lamentation of their women." Conan the Barbarian, 1982
View user's profile Send private message
Shayan G





Joined: 26 Sep 2006

Posts: 140

PostPosted: Wed 17 Oct, 2007 2:12 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Ah, I remember reading that somewhere too, thanks for reminding me! The account that first popped into my mind was of an antique, and even some of the ammunition used in the antique rifle was leftover from the British, which is what really astounded me. I don't know too much about rifles and I had NO idea antique ammunition could work decades after manufacture. The Enfield sounds like quite the rifle.
View user's profile Send private message
Lin Robinson




Location: NC
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Likes: 6 pages
Reading list: 6 books

Posts: 1,241

PostPosted: Wed 17 Oct, 2007 2:14 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Etienne Hamel wrote:
nope smaller than that like a small bridge on the bolt.
Is the actual sight a "peep" sight?  Does it have a disk with a small hole in the center? If so, it could be an after market Williams or Lyman sight, although I do not know if either of these companies ever made one for the Enfield.  It is sounding more like this gun has been sporterized. And, it is also possible that it is equipped with one ofthe Galilean sights used by the British on sniper rifles, although I think that is unlikely. Detailed photos of the gun would almost certainly solve the mystery.

Incidentally, I ran the "de-cocking" procedure by some guys on a forum that is devoted to surplus military firearms and the rsponse was unanimous.  Do not do that!  It is dangerous and unnecessary.

Lin Robinson

"The best thing in life is to crush your enemies, see them driven before you and hear the lamentation of their women." Conan the Barbarian, 1982
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Trueman





Joined: 27 Mar 2006

Posts: 246

PostPosted: Wed 17 Oct, 2007 2:23 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

"nope smaller than that like a small bridge on the bolt."

Gee that sounds like a no4 Mk1 etc. But the pic you sent from wikpedia is the first SMLE, with volley sights. Does the little sight flip up and down?

N
View user's profile Send private message
Nick Trueman





Joined: 27 Mar 2006

Posts: 246

PostPosted: Wed 17 Oct, 2007 5:06 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Ok any closer?


 Attachment: 8.48 KB
peep-enfield-web.jpg

View user's profile Send private message
Nick Trueman





Joined: 27 Mar 2006

Posts: 246

PostPosted: Wed 17 Oct, 2007 5:14 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

The only other true SMLE I can think of with a sight over the breech is the Mk V trial rifle. If this what you own hang onto it.

check the link

http://enfieldrifles.profusehost.net/ri3a.htm
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > short magazine lee enfield mkIII
Page 2 of 3 Reply to topic
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum