Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > question of weight and length Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Steven Yu





Joined: 05 Jan 2009

Posts: 3

PostPosted: Mon 05 Jan, 2009 9:36 am    Post subject: question of weight and length         Quote

It is about the weight and length of axe, mace, flail, hammer, and sword.

1. use middle age senario, let us say, A.D.1300, in Paris.

2. design for two different people: A) male, 1.9m. B) female,1.75m. Their BMI are nomal, strong and health.

3. axe, mace, flail, hammer, and swrod are made by same metal and only metal.

Questions:

1. the suitalbe weight and length of axe, mace, flail, hammer, and sword for male.

2. for female.

3. if all are made in same length, say, 2m for two hand use, what are their weight by using 1300 technology ?

4. what if for one hand use? say, in 0.9m, what will the 5 different weight be?

5. which metal will be used in 1300? what is the heaviest metal in middle age Europe?

6. will the density same in all parts of the weapon? or some parts will be heavier for balance? or just modify the shape to adjust the balance?

waiting for English answers, please do not make me read non-English texts.
Profile PM
Arne Focke
Industry Professional



Location: near Munich, Germany
Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Reading list: 34 books

Posts: 204

PostPosted: Mon 05 Jan, 2009 10:24 am    Post subject:         Quote

If you read all the related features articles here on myArmoury (http://www.myArmoury.com/features.html) you will be able to get a real good idea concerning your questions... and they are all in English.
You will figure out that your questions may have been phrased a tad too simple.
Nr. 5 is pretty easy though: lead. But i don't recommend it in blades ;)

So schön und inhaltsreich der Beruf eines Archäologen ist, so hart ist auch seine Arbeit, die keinen Achtstundentag kennt! (Wolfgang Kimmig in: Die Heuneburg an der oberen Donau, Stuttgart 1983)
Profile PM Website
Bram Verbeek





Joined: 27 Mar 2007

Posts: 217

PostPosted: Mon 05 Jan, 2009 2:47 pm    Post subject:         Quote

I'd say gold. though the same applies.
Profile PM
Arne Focke
Industry Professional



Location: near Munich, Germany
Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Reading list: 34 books

Posts: 204

PostPosted: Tue 06 Jan, 2009 3:58 am    Post subject:         Quote

Yes, of course you are right. Stupid me... :\
So schön und inhaltsreich der Beruf eines Archäologen ist, so hart ist auch seine Arbeit, die keinen Achtstundentag kennt! (Wolfgang Kimmig in: Die Heuneburg an der oberen Donau, Stuttgart 1983)
Profile PM Website
Steven Yu





Joined: 05 Jan 2009

Posts: 3

PostPosted: Tue 06 Jan, 2009 6:25 am    Post subject:         Quote

come on. i work 96 hours a week.

please tell me which article i should read or just provide me the formula.
Profile PM
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Tue 06 Jan, 2009 6:59 am    Post subject:         Quote

Steven Yu wrote:
come on. i work 96 hours a week.

please tell me which article i should read or just provide me the formula.


We all are busy, but have to do at least some of our own homework. :)

There is no formula. Weights will vary by shape, taper in two dimensions, thicknesses, materials, etc. There are too many variables. Our reviews and articles show a wide number of weapons, so you can see the variety.

Some swords were heavy (~5 pounds), some were light (~2 pounds). You could have a light longsword, or a heavy arming sword, etc., etc., etc.

Impact weapons vary quite a bit as well.

There is so magic number or formula. Even calculating an average would be pointless unless you average very similar weapons.

:)

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
Profile PM E-mail Website
Arne Focke
Industry Professional



Location: near Munich, Germany
Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Reading list: 34 books

Posts: 204

PostPosted: Tue 06 Jan, 2009 7:04 am    Post subject:         Quote

There is no such thing as a formula for your questions.
Every sword is different. That goes for lower quality blades as well a high quality ones made with a specific user in mind.

These articles may help you along the way:

MyArmourys own beginners guide:
http://www.myArmoury.com/feature_swordintro1.html

A nice artcile about blade hardness:
http://www.myArmoury.com/feature_bladehardness.html

Geibigs sword typology (in short):
http://www.myArmoury.com/feature_geibig.html

For your obvious interest in huge swords around 1300 Oakeshotts Type XIII should be about right:
http://www.myArmoury.com/feature_spotxiii.html

If you want to compare some modern replicas, take a look a this tool:
http://www.myArmoury.com/compare.html

So schön und inhaltsreich der Beruf eines Archäologen ist, so hart ist auch seine Arbeit, die keinen Achtstundentag kennt! (Wolfgang Kimmig in: Die Heuneburg an der oberen Donau, Stuttgart 1983)
Profile PM Website
Steven Yu





Joined: 05 Jan 2009

Posts: 3

PostPosted: Tue 06 Jan, 2009 7:57 am    Post subject:         Quote

You are good guys.

I am looking for the reliabel relationship between weigts and lengths of said 4 non-sword weapons.

And I found it very difficult to find the data.

Axe, Flail, Hammer, Mace
Profile PM


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > question of weight and length
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum