
| myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term. Last 10 Donors: Piotr H. Feret, Graham Shearlaw, Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary (View All Donors) |
| Author |
Message |
|
R. D. Simpson
|
Posted: Sun 23 Jul, 2006 11:55 pm Post subject: Relative Properties of Maille and Scale Armour? |
|
|
I've begun to wonder about the relative advantages and disadvantages of maille and scale armour. I used the search feature, but have exhausted all search criteria that I could think of without finding an answer.
It seems to me that an upward cut or thrust could slide in between scales and (relatively) easily penetrate the fabric backing, but is that an accurate assessment?
Since maille seems to have been much more prevalent into medieval times, my guess would be that it had advantages over scale in weight, protection, or both, but I'm still pretty new to this so I could be completely off base.
So, which offered better protection, scale or maille? Which weighed more? Obviously the weight and protection of maille would depend on ring size and thickness, so for the purposes of this discussion let's assume a thickness roughly equal to between 16 and 14gauge and an inner diameter of around 3/8in.
Gloria Virtutem Sequitur
|
|
|
 |
Chuck Russell

|
Posted: Mon 24 Jul, 2006 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
ah but if your going by historical accounts, mail is more like 18 gauge 6mm ID.
romans had both scale and mail. but as time told, mail won out.
|
|
|
 |
|
R. D. Simpson
|
Posted: Mon 24 Jul, 2006 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Chuck Russell wrote: | ah but if your going by historical accounts, mail is more like 18 gauge 6mm ID.
romans had both scale and mail. but as time told, mail won out. |
Whoops :\
Okay, so instead of 16-14 gauge and 3/8in inner diameter, assume 18 gauge and 6mm (1/4in) inner diameter. :D
I was aware that maille won out, but I wondered why this was? Did it have to do with performance in battle, ease of production, or was it some combination thereof?
Gloria Virtutem Sequitur
|
|
|
 |
Dan Howard

|
Posted: Mon 24 Jul, 2006 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Scale has no advantages over mail except perhaps that it is a little quicker to manufacture and hence likely to be cheaper. Scale is harder to maintain. It deteriorates more quickly. It is heavier. It offers less protection. It is not as flexible.
|
|
|
 |
|
R. D. Simpson
|
Posted: Mon 24 Jul, 2006 2:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Dan Howard wrote: | | Scale has no advantages over mail except perhaps that it is a little quicker to manufacture and hence likely to be cheaper. Scale is harder to maintain. It deteriorates more quickly. It is heavier. It offers less protection. It is not as flexible. |
Thanks: that's what I wanted to know. By the way, about how much would a scale coat have weighed, assuming the same measurements as a full hauberk?
Gloria Virtutem Sequitur
|
|
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2026 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|