
| myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term. Last 10 Donors: Graham Shearlaw, Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler (View All Donors) |
Author |
Message |
Joshua Reptsik

|
Posted: Thu 09 Feb, 2006 3:03 pm Post subject: Pronouncing Oakeshott Typology |
|
|
I'm a bit embarrassed to ask this but I am starting to study Oakeshott's typology. The one that I'm a bit confused about is how one would verbally say them. I'm assuming you just say the number that corresponds with the Roman numeral but I am not certain. I'd rather clear this up here than say it incorrectly infront of someone who knows their sh...stuff. Thanks!
" You little fool who wanted to be the best, see what happened." -MS 3227a
|
|
|
 |
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


|
Posted: Thu 09 Feb, 2006 3:07 pm Post subject: Re: Pronouncing Oakeshott Typology |
|
|
Joshua Reptsik wrote: | I'm a bit embarrassed to ask this but I am starting to study Oakeshott's typology. The one that I'm a bit confused about is how one would verbally say them. I'm assuming you just say the number that corresponds with the Roman numeral but I am not certain. I'd rather clear this up here than say it incorrectly infront of someone who knows their sh...stuff. Thanks! |
Just say the numbers: XVIII = "eighteen," XVIa = "Sixteen A," etc. You probably already know this but we have a whole series of articles on the Oakeshott Typology. The last one, Type XVII (seventeen ) will be published in the coming weeks.
ChadA
http://chadarnow.com/
|
|
|
 |
Joshua Reptsik

|
Posted: Thu 09 Feb, 2006 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Now I know. Thanks for the timely answer.
" You little fool who wanted to be the best, see what happened." -MS 3227a
|
|
|
 |
Stephen Hughes
Location: Grand Bend, Ontario Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 22
|
Posted: Thu 09 Feb, 2006 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You're not the only one who ever wondered about that! For a while there I wondered if it was "Type Ex-Vee" or "Type Fifteen." I decided the latter by default but this is the first time I've been reasonable sure of that :-)
|
|
|
 |
Kenton Spaulding
|
Posted: Thu 09 Feb, 2006 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
While we're at it, I've got a similar question. Is the I:33 manuscript pronouced I (like eye) or 1? I'm honestly glad I've never had a reason to talk about it in person because I have no idea what to call it.
Thanks
Kenton
|
|
|
 |
Eric Allen
|
Posted: Thu 09 Feb, 2006 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kenton Spaulding wrote: | While we're at it, I've got a similar question. Is the I:33 manuscript pronouced I (like eye) or 1? I'm honestly glad I've never had a reason to talk about it in person because I have no idea what to call it.
Thanks
Kenton |
Yeah, I have the same question, considering I've seen instructions to say it both ways on seperate websites. Personally, I think "one-thirty-three" makes more sence, as its supposedly the museum catalogue number, but "eye-thirty-three" is awfly tempting to say.
|
|
|
 |
Bill Grandy
myArmoury Team


|
Posted: Thu 09 Feb, 2006 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Eric Allen wrote: | Personally, I think "one-thirty-three" makes more sence, as its supposedly the museum catalogue number, |
Yep, that's exactly right.
HistoricalHandcrafts.com
-Inspired by History, Crafted by Hand
"For practice is better than artfulness. Your exercise can do well without artfulness, but artfulness is not much good without the exercise.” -anonymous 15th century fencing master, MS 3227a
|
|
|
 |
Stephen Hand

|
|
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2025 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|