
| myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term. Last 10 Donors: Graham Shearlaw, Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler (View All Donors) |
Author |
Message |
Ian Hutchison

Location: Louisiana / Nordrhein-Westholland Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 626
|
Posted: Mon 02 Jan, 2023 2:52 pm Post subject: Initial impressions: Windlass 1796 Light Cavalry Saber |
|
|
New 1796 Light Cavalry saber by Windlass arrived from Atlanta Cutlery Co. today. I've been waiting for an accurate reproduction since I first learned about these swords almost two decades ago.
I have to say it has been worth the wait though. The parabolic distal taper of the originals has rarely been reproduced in modern replicas, leading to many being over-weight and poor handling. My Universal replica was like swinging a crow-bar.
The handling of this sword is as good as everyone else has reported so far elsewhere. Very agile for the PoB.
My stats are as follow;
Mass: 840g
PoB: 7in, 178mm
Base thickness: 8.85mm
1/4 thickness: 4mm
3/4 thickness: 3.4mm
Tip thickness: 2.3mm
Thanks to the light mass, it is not at all taxing to recover from a strike or maneuver with despite the point of balance being seven inches from the hilt. It's actually feels more lively than my original Blücher.
There is only one slight cosmetic defect on mine, the back spine of the grip is very slightly off-center, but it doesn't seem to inhibit feel or function.
One minor reservation I have is that I wonder how well the grip wrap will hold up to use, it doesn't feel like the leather is particularly tough. We will see. The scabbard is very nice, the brazing of the fittings is clean, and a thoughtful period touch.
So far I am more than satisfied; quite happy that this sought after product has finally come to market. Might need a second one.
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
'We are told that the pen is mightier than the sword, but I know which of these weapons I would choose.' - Adrian Carton de Wiart
|
|
|
 |
Paul Hansen

|
Posted: Fri 06 Jan, 2023 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Ian! Good to see there is finally a reproduction of that sword type which is not overweight.
What is the weight / POB of your original?
|
|
|
 |
Ian Hutchison

Location: Louisiana / Nordrhein-Westholland Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 626
|
Posted: Wed 11 Jan, 2023 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Paul Hansen wrote: | Thanks Ian! Good to see there is finally a reproduction of that sword type which is not overweight.
What is the weight / POB of your original? |
Sorry for the slow reply Paul, I want to say the weight on my original is ~950g. I don't recall the PoB off hand right now, it may have been farther out, the Windlass feels livelier.
'We are told that the pen is mightier than the sword, but I know which of these weapons I would choose.' - Adrian Carton de Wiart
|
|
|
 |
Iagoba Ferreira

|
Posted: Wed 01 Mar, 2023 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have handled a couple of originals and it is surprisingly "light" despite the width and thickness of the blades back edge! A great, practical design of swords.
I have always wanted one, but I'm too afraid of getting a overweight, point heavy iron bar instead of something close to the original.
|
|
|
 |
Ulf Lidsman
|
Posted: Wed 01 Mar, 2023 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I got mine yesterday and so far I'm very pleased. One question about the leather washer; should I have the rough side against the hilt or towards the blade?
|
|
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2025 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|