Author |
Message |
Steven Pearson
|
|
|
 |
Blaz Berlec

|
|
|
 |
Steven Pearson
|
Posted: Tue 25 Jun, 2019 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ha your right it does sadly. I am in contact with Armstreet support over the issue so we will see how it goes. I will report back on what occurs.
|
|
|
 |
Pieter B.
|
Posted: Wed 26 Jun, 2019 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well I can tell you the helmet you received is indeed quite different from the photo's provided.
Can't know for sure but it seems like they took some design clues from this Italian example
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
If the above is indeed their inspiration they aren't entirely on point.
The skull terminates far higher and further to the rear, when the visor is down it points down and not forward, the hinges turn into the visor at a curve and not a ninety degree angle, the 'snout' and vision slits sit lower on the visor giving a larger brow/forehead part of the visor.
I have to add that the look of the Lyle bascinet depends on the angle a lot;
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
That said it also looks after the Historic Enterprise one;
[ Linked Image ]
http://historicenterprises.com/bascinet-itali...th=104_153
The holes in the eye slots seem like those on this (Italian?) example now found in Switzerland;
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
I hope this helps in some capacity.
PS, sometimes it can he hard to see if the visor was original with the helmet or whether the whole ensemble is some composite piece in which case the exact fitting is always suspect.
|
|
|
 |
Edward Lee
|
Posted: Sat 29 Jun, 2019 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJUVXWeN0Es
This is the one they advertised on youtube, it does look different as your visor seem to be somewhat bent downward. If anything maybe you could ask them for a new replacement visor.
|
|
|
 |
Steven Pearson
|
Posted: Mon 01 Jul, 2019 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pieter B. wrote: | Well I can tell you the helmet you received is indeed quite different from the photo's provided.
Can't know for sure but it seems like they took some design clues from this Italian example
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
If the above is indeed their inspiration they aren't entirely on point.
The skull terminates far higher and further to the rear, when the visor is down it points down and not forward, the hinges turn into the visor at a curve and not a ninety degree angle, the 'snout' and vision slits sit lower on the visor giving a larger brow/forehead part of the visor.
I have to add that the look of the Lyle bascinet depends on the angle a lot;
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
That said it also looks after the Historic Enterprise one;
[ Linked Image ]
http://historicenterprises.com/bascinet-itali...th=104_153
The holes in the eye slots seem like those on this (Italian?) example now found in Switzerland;
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
I hope this helps in some capacity.
PS, sometimes it can he hard to see if the visor was original with the helmet or whether the whole ensemble is some composite piece in which case the exact fitting is always suspect. |
These historical examples are what I was looking for in look. I believe they loosely based the helm on the Churburg helmet. Thanks for sharing these. My thoughts are similar to yours, the dimensions are way off from the photos displayed.
That historical enterprises helm is all kinds of awesome, but oh my gawd the price. I don't make enough money to justify that purchase haha.
|
|
|
 |
Steven Pearson
|
Posted: Mon 01 Jul, 2019 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Edward Lee wrote: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJUVXWeN0Es
This is the one they advertised on youtube, it does look different as your visor seem to be somewhat bent downward. If anything maybe you could ask them for a new replacement visor. |
Interesting...I had not seen this, thank you for sharing. They said I can return it for a full refund so that is what I am going. I have yet to get the refund yet so will see how it goes. I am planning to ship it out tomorrow.
|
|
|
 |
Tom Wolfe
Location: East Anglia, England Joined: 10 Aug 2015
Posts: 83
|
Posted: Wed 10 Jul, 2019 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disappointing for you but the correct thing to do, I suppose. I think the skull looks ok, but the visor is dead wrong, especially as it doesn't even compare to the photographs by which it was advertised. Looking at the downward slant of the nose, it made me think rather of the drooping shape of a gothic sabaton, or of the plague mask as pictured above. Certainly not the rather stubbier, upward-facing visor of every other bascinet that we have seen.
Steven Pearson wrote: | Edward Lee wrote: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJUVXWeN0Es
This is the one they advertised on youtube, it does look different as your visor seem to be somewhat bent downward. If anything maybe you could ask them for a new replacement visor. |
Interesting...I had not seen this, thank you for sharing. They said I can return it for a full refund so that is what I am going. I have yet to get the refund yet so will see how it goes. I am planning to ship it out tomorrow. |
Collector of original 16th-17th century European arms and armour. Would like to collect earlier, but budget doesn't allow- yet!
|
|
|
 |
Steven Pearson
|
Posted: Wed 14 Aug, 2019 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well Armstreet refunded my money including return shipping in full, even though it took a few weeks to do the refund.
They were responsive and admitted to most of my complaints and that the helmet did not match the helmet on the website. I have nothing bad to say about their customer service and would order from them again since they were willing to make it right. I also got a belt with brass etchings that is very nice.
|
|
|
 |
James Arlen Gillaspie
Industry Professional

Location: upstate NY Joined: 10 Nov 2005
Posts: 587
|
Posted: Mon 26 Aug, 2019 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
The skull shown in the original photos is not good, either- flip the picture and put it next to the Lyle bacinet. Not enough crush space in the top. Too low.
jamesarlen.com
|
|
|
 |
|