
| myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term. Last 10 Donors: Graham Shearlaw, Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler (View All Donors) |
Author |
Message |
Michael B.
Industry Professional

Location: Seattle, WA Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 367
|
Posted: Thu 30 Dec, 2010 11:54 am Post subject: Interesting body defence |
|
|
Ran across this artwork of Hugh O'Neil, Earl of Tyrone, 1550-1616. It looks like a coat of brigandine over chain. The brigandine spalder (shoulder defense) is interesting. Thoughts?
www.bearmountainforge.com
Michael Bergstrom
|
|
|
 |
Timo Nieminen
|
Posted: Thu 30 Dec, 2010 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like an armpit protector is there too.
Cut the armhole on the body too high, and you can't move your arms easily. Cut it too low, and there's a big gap. A solution: have a separate piece that sits tight up against the bottom of the top of the upper arm, to cover this armpit-gap in the body armour. Looks like this one might be attached to the spaulders.
Armpit protectors like this were a standard part of Chinese brigandines. A good example is the one shown in Stone, which has lots of buttons/points/laces. I've not seen the details of how one is worn, but I expect that it attached to the spaulder (and will help secure the spaulder), and maybe the long laces attach (loosely) to the body, stopping it from flapping open, exposing the gap. Can't attach tightly to the body, since it needs to move up and down with the arm. (Any Chinese armour wearers out there know how it's worn?)
"In addition to being efficient, all pole arms were quite nice to look at." - Cherney Berg, A hideous history of weapons, Collier 1963.
|
|
|
 |
Michael B.
Industry Professional

Location: Seattle, WA Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 367
|
Posted: Thu 30 Dec, 2010 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The more I look at this...
Is this covered armour?
www.bearmountainforge.com
Michael Bergstrom
|
|
|
 |
Thom R.

|
Posted: Thu 30 Dec, 2010 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The O'Neill portrait you posted is not from 1570 but is from a Victorian rendition of an earlier woodcut and has been questioned as to its accuracy. Actually I think at this point it is safe to say that academically, the image shown has been proven to be inaccurate and a bit of a victorian fantasy/whimsy. for reference, see the post by Mr. Millman in this thread:
Armour of Hugh O'Neill
http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t...ght=oneill
it has been discussed before in several threads.........
|
|
|
 |
Michael B.
Industry Professional

Location: Seattle, WA Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 367
|
Posted: Thu 30 Dec, 2010 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excellent, thanks. It was a bit odd to my eyes.
www.bearmountainforge.com
Michael Bergstrom
|
|
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2025 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|