Info Favorites Register Log in Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term.
Last 10 Donors: Matthew Milito, Anonymous, Sean Flynt, Jean Thibodeau, Daniel Parry, Gossart Pierre, Craig Johnson, Daniel Sullivan, Dan Howard, Jeff Cierniak (View All Donors)

Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > Wooden vs. synthetic montante for solo drills? Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
William Br.

Location: United States
Joined: 03 Jan 2015

Posts: 3

PostPosted: Mon 27 Apr, 2015 12:06 pm    Post subject: Wooden vs. synthetic montante for solo drills?         Reply with quote

I'm considering the purchase of Purpleheart's wooden or synthetic montante ( ). Which will handle the most like steel for solo drills? Has anyone tried both? Most synthetic vs. wood discussions I've read spend much time on the bind and safety and other sparring considerations. I just want to learn good form for solo handling drills of a steel sharp when I can obtain one. I considered the Windlass English Two-hand Sword in the standard unsharpened state to learn on ( ), but it's $250, and the Purpleheart wooden montante is only $100. The synthetic montante is slightly more expensive, but has the advantage of greater weight (4.7 vs. 4 lbs. for the wooden). But I'm wondering if the flex of nylon would exceed steel and throw off handling (though I know the rigidity of wood has some unrealistic aspects as well). If the Windlass would be a better trainer I would probably go that route, but if either Purpleheart will do I'd be $90-150 closer to a finer blade. The Windlass is 4.6 lbs. but since the point of balance is 3.75", I'm thinking that the 4 lbs. of the wooden montante with a POB of 7" would in some ways require (and thusly build) more strength. Any advice or opinions are welcome. Forgive my detail, but I wanted to be thorough in my questions.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ben Coomer

Location: Colorado
Joined: 06 Sep 2011
Likes: 1 page

Posts: 184

PostPosted: Mon 27 Apr, 2015 6:02 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Personally, I vastly prefer wood to synthetics. The synthetics I've worked with tend towards whippiness that I dislike when trying to do solo practice.

But this is with longswords and a limited amount of synthetics, so I can't offer a direct analysis of Purpleheart's Montante.
View user's profile Send private message
Lafayette C Curtis

Location: Indonesia
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Reading list: 7 books

Posts: 2,698

PostPosted: Wed 06 May, 2015 3:45 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

The montante is just so far outside the norm of most people's expectations about swords (especially with regards to how to manoeuvre the very long grip around the body) that I don't think it's really going to make much of a difference. It's going to start out pretty awkward either way. The main consideration would be whether you're thinking of going to steel or not -- if you are, buying wood would probably help you save towards a decent training montante from the likes of Regenyei or A&A.
View user's profile Send private message

Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > Wooden vs. synthetic montante for solo drills?
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

All contents © Copyright 2003-2021 — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum