| myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term. Last 10 Donors: Graham Shearlaw, Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler (View All Donors) |
Author |
Message |
Niels Just Rasmussen
|
Posted: Thu 12 Feb, 2015 12:09 pm Post subject: Beautiful La Tene sword from Lindholmgård Mose. |
|
|
According to this paper you have found 9 “Pre-Roman Iron Age“ swords from Sjælland (Zealand) and Skåne (Scania):
Source: https://www.academia.edu/10277082/Weapons_Armament_and_Society._The_Pre-Roman_Iron_Age_on_Zealand_and_in_Scania
Martens, Jes
Weapons, armaments and society. The Pre-Roman Iron Age on Zealand and in Scania.
Page 147-174
In “The Iron Age on Zealand. Status and Perspectives“ (2011)
Edited by Linda Boye
Nordiske Fortidsminder. Series C, Volume 8.
The best preserved two-edged weapons is shown on page 152 and the (c) picture is the sword from Lindholmgård Mose.
Single-edged swords on page 153.
Here is a big picture of the Lindholmgård Mose sword (with it's pommel) and scabbard: [Here is the picture upright - the attachment below is the same picture just flipped to the right].
Source: http://samlinger.natmus.dk/DO/1885
Page 162-168 discusses a new Sword typology based on the Pre-roman Iron Age swords assemblies found at Hjortspring and Krogsbølle.
The original drawing of the Lindholdgård Mose sword should be this article (though he states the drawing on p. 152 (c) should be an article from 1949, whereas in the references it must be this 1950 paper):
Klindt-Jensen, Ole (1950).
Foreign Influences in Denmark’s Early Iron Age.
Acta Archaeologica XX, p. 1-248.
NB: Should be figure 15.
The find is also discussed on page 55 & 78 in this publication, which luckily I own:
Liversage, David (1980).
Material and Interpretation. The Archaeology of Sjælland in the early Roman Iron Age.
Publications of the National Museum.
Archaeological-Historical Series I, Vol XX
“E2. Lindholmgård, Uvelse Parish, Lynge-Frederiksborg Herred 33UUB2892.
A very fine iron la Tène sword with bronze guard and hollow silver knob at pommel, which was found together with its bronze scabbard at depth of three feet during peat cutting in 1888. One of the earliest occurrences of silver in Northern Europe.
Klindt-Jensen (1950) fig. 15 NMK. C 6131".
"The blade was three-ribbed in section and blunt-ended with a slight central projection. The concave grooves of the blade were ornamented with punch marks. The guard was mounted with an ogivally-arched plate, and the grip of the organic material (now vanished) had been embellished with two narrow bronze bands bearing a zig-zag pattern. The Iron tang ends in a projecting point, and it was presumingly on this that the little silver globe, which belongs to the find, had its place."
“The sword had been deposited inside its iron scabbard, which consisted of two plates, of which that in front was bent around at the edges to enclose the one behind. The scabbard ended in a straight bronze chape, and was carried with the help of two suspension loops of iron, affixed at different heights on opposite edges of the scabbard."
Liversage brings attention to a similar sword and scabbard also with a silver globe at the pommel.
The grave 26 Harsefeld sword; where he gives this reference.
Wegewitz, W. (1937)
Die langobardische Kultur in Gau Moswidi, (Niederelbe) zu Beginn unser Zeitrechnung.
Die Urnenfriedhöfe in Niedersachsen, Band 2, Heft 1/2, Hildesheim/Leipzig.
Also the Grossromstedt sword should be close in type.
Eichhorn, G. (1927)
Der Urnenfriedhof auf der Schwanze bei Grossromstedt.
Mannus-Bibl. 4 Leipzig.
He ends disputing Klindt-Jensen (1950). "The Lindholmgård sword cannot have been a Celtic import.........as its parallels lie north of the Celtic area and date from after the fall of the Celtic civilization".
Liversage (1980) doesn't have a picture of the Lindholmgård sword, but instead of the Tissø sword (p.79) -> that picture is reproduced on page 152 (b) in the Martens article referred to at the top.
So hopefully Liversage gives some information for a reproduction by those who wants to.
In his great four-bind volume of “Danmarks Oldtid“ (2004, 2006) Jørgen Jensen gives the total length of the Lindholmgård Mose sword to 85 cm (Bind 3, page 173). That was actually a bit longer than I thought compared with the length I calculated from the Liversage picture of the Tissø sword given below.
Tissø Sword: Total length ~70 cm.
Based on the image of the Tissø sword in Liversage I guess that blade is ~55 cm to the small guard and ~60 cm to where the hilt begins. Then ~10 cm hilt.
Attachment: 101.66 KB
La Tene Sword - Lindholmgård Mose. Source: http://samlinger.natmus.dk/DO/1885 [ Download ]
Last edited by Niels Just Rasmussen on Tue 17 Feb, 2015 7:35 am; edited 6 times in total
|
|
|
|
Luka Borscak
|
Posted: Thu 12 Feb, 2015 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks! That article on academia.edu is very interesting, I didn't know there were other La Tene swords found in that area except the Lindholmgard sword.
|
|
|
|
Kai Lawson
|
Posted: Thu 12 Feb, 2015 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I really appreciate posts like this: interesting weapons, with archeological information attached to them. Thanks very much for this, and others like it (the viking axe thread, for example).
"And they crossed swords."
--William Goldman, alias S. Morgenstern
|
|
|
|
Aaron O'Bryan-Herriott
|
Posted: Fri 13 Feb, 2015 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I too appreciate this post. It's very kind of you to bring it to our attention... although I would love to get my hands on the printed/published material in original form
Is there a way to find and buy it?
Also, in the text I found this sentence:
<< These swords belong to Jørgensen’s types Sax 2, 3 and 4. >>
Can someone please enlighten me as to who the mentioned "Jørgensen" is here and where I might find any published work from them on Sax typology? I ask because I have a big soft spot for these blades and I hadn't heard this name associated with them before. I've seen the Sax typology ( http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=18459 ) thread here, but don't recall any mention of a Jørgensen in it...
Thanks...
Aaron
|
|
|
|
Aaron O'Bryan-Herriott
|
Posted: Fri 13 Feb, 2015 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry for the request on where to buy the book... I found a source after a very brief web search.
|
|
|
|
Niels Just Rasmussen
|
Posted: Fri 13 Feb, 2015 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Aaron O'Bryan-Herriott wrote: | I too appreciate this post. It's very kind of you to bring it to our attention... although I would love to get my hands on the printed/published material in original form
Is there a way to find and buy it?
Also, in the text I found this sentence:
<< These swords belong to Jørgensen’s types Sax 2, 3 and 4. >>
Can someone please enlighten me as to who the mentioned "Jørgensen" is here and where I might find any published work from them on Sax typology? I ask because I have a big soft spot for these blades and I hadn't heard this name associated with them before. I've seen the Sax typology ( http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=18459 ) thread here, but don't recall any mention of a Jørgensen in it...
Thanks...
Aaron |
I would reckon it is this book from the Series B of “Nordiske Fortidsminder: (Danish publishing, written in German).
Nørgård Jørgensen, Anne (1999).
Waffen und Gräber: typologische und chronologische Studien zu skandinavischen Waffen gräbern 520/30 bis 900 n. chr. (Nordiske Fortidsminder ser. B Vol. 17). 417 pages, 279 b&w and colour figures, 4 tables.
Copenhagen: Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab;
Danish website: http://www.oldskriftselskabet.dk/
Click left on "Nordiske Fortidsminder“ and then afterwards scroll down to series B “bind 17“.
The Martens article is from the same publisher:
Series C bind 8 - that is the book at the very bottom of the page.
It seems that the National Museum shop has sold out the first one (but see the german source under the attachment, which has both books), but the Martens article from the newer book they still have.
See: http://www.museumsbutikken.dk/default.aspx?lo...amp;group=
This thread on a competing forum provides the scans of the sax types (the other instances on “myArmoury“ I found, lead to a dead link):
http://www.bladesmithsforum.com/index.php?sho...amp;page=4
Attachment: 191.4 KB
Front page of the book: Source (found a place where you can by it): http://www.antikmakler.de/catalog/cat-76/cat-1131/cat-277/bmaw1.html
|
|
|
|
Jerry Monaghan
|
Posted: Sat 14 Feb, 2015 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Niels
Thanks for posting this is fantastic I appreciate posts like this the sword is amazing and I would love to have it replicated
in all its glory.
Regards
Jerry Monaghan
|
|
|
|
Niels Just Rasmussen
|
Posted: Sat 14 Feb, 2015 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Martens discussed in his paper the new sword typology done from assemblages at Hjortspring & Krogsbølle.
The Nationalmuseum has a page with pictures of weaponry and a typical shield from Hjortspring.
Age 350 BC, so early Iron Age.
Source: http://natmus.dk/historisk-viden/danmark/oldt...ortspring/
Here is a picture of the Krogsbølle weapons: [date a bit more unclear, possibly 250-100 BC)
Source: http://samlinger.natmus.dk/DO/1314
Another picture of Krogsbølle finds:
Source: http://historiskatlas.dk/image/1/60801.jpg
Attachment: 27.49 KB
Hjortspring swords. Source: http://natmus.dk/historisk-viden/danmark/oldtid-indtil-aar-1050/aeldre-jernalder-500-fkr-400-ekr/haeren-fra-hjortspring-mose/haeren-fra-hjortspring/
Last edited by Niels Just Rasmussen on Tue 17 Feb, 2015 7:41 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
Aaron O'Bryan-Herriott
|
Posted: Mon 16 Feb, 2015 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, once again I'd like to thank you for your kindness Niels.
I immediately recognized those photographed blades as the same ones in the illustrations from the Martens' piece
I adds considerably to my understanding of them to see their surfaces.
As a matter of interest from the POV of one who spends some time at the forge at home, has anyone ever gone into the original makers went about creating the ridged back on some of these sax blades? I can imagine a few possibilities, but I wonder if there are opinions better qualified than mine which have already been put forward...
Thanks again...
Aaron
|
|
|
|
Niels Just Rasmussen
|
Posted: Tue 17 Feb, 2015 2:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Aaron O'Bryan-Herriott wrote: | Yes, once again I'd like to thank you for your kindness Niels.
I immediately recognized those photographed blades as the same ones in the illustrations from the Martens' piece
I adds considerably to my understanding of them to see their surfaces.
As a matter of interest from the POV of one who spends some time at the forge at home, has anyone ever gone into the original makers went about creating the ridged back on some of these sax blades? I can imagine a few possibilities, but I wonder if there are opinions better qualified than mine which have already been put forward...
Thanks again...
Aaron |
Well thank you for showing interest in the thread. Happy to be of help.
I actually don't know how much detailed smithing-research that has been done on the Danish finds. I would guess most of it is typology work or occasional metallurgy samples.
Actual remakes done by Danish Musems to get as close to the original as possible I actually don't know if it happens very often.
|
|
|
|
Niels Just Rasmussen
|
Posted: Tue 17 Feb, 2015 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Found info about the total length of the Lindhomgård Mose sword.
85 cm according to Jørgen Jensen. Info also edited to the top post.
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|