Single-edged swords
A rookie question, no doubt, but I'd be interested to know- I have seen European swords with a single blade edge dating from the Viking Age, and obviously there are plenty of sabre-type single edged swords from the 16th century and onwards. By the 18th century practically every European military sword is single edged.

So what about the in between time? I don't remember having ever seen single-edged sword blades from, say, 13th-15th centuries. Do they exist? Thanks!
Look up the terms falchion, storta, and kreigsmesser or alternatively langes messer. Should keep you busy for a while! :)
A quite famous 15c example from the Royal Armouries, Leeds is at the bottom of the page here http://myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=15355
And another one from the same period here: http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/arms-armor...tails.aspx
As posted above, there are many, many styles of medieval single-edged swords. One might want to read our primer, Forms of European Edged Weaponry. As mentioned by the topic author, many of these styles are more popular in the 16th century onwards.

Additionally, there are swords that might appear at first glance to have two edges but are actually single-edged.

Eric McHugh made a reproduction based on one from Leeds and it can be seen in his topic. I'd guess many people saw the photo of the antique several times without realizing it has only one edge.

[ Linked Image ]
14th century, single edged, short sword from the Royal Armoury in Leeds
Gregory, Encho, thank you for your responses. I am of course familiar with the falchion and storta, but I don't really regard them as "swords proper". The references to kreigsmesser and langes messer were very helpful though. The existence of swords like this which, to my eye, look very similar to a typical broadsword is very interesting and rather begs the question- why didn't they sharpen a cutting edge on both sides?


 Attachment: 14.51 KB
Kreigsmesser.jpg

Nathan Robinson wrote:
As posted above, there are many, many styles of medieval single-edged swords. One might want to read our primer, Forms of European Edged Weaponry. As mentioned by the topic author, many of these styles are more popular in the 16th century onwards.

Additionally, there are swords that might appear at first glance to have two edges but are actually single-edged.

Eric McHugh made a reproduction based on one from Leeds and it can be seen in his topic. I'd guess many people saw the photo of the antique several times without realizing it has only one edge.

[ Linked Image ]
14th century, single edged, short sword from the Royal Armoury in Leeds


Thanks Nathan- the point you made about single-bladed swords that at first sight look double-sided hits the nail on the head. The point that has prompted my enquiry is that I saw a sword recently, which I am considering buying. The sword is described as late 15th century. It has an S shaped guard and a large ball-shaped fluted pommel (please excuse lack of any more technical language). The blade, while appearing at first sight to be double-edged is in fact single-edged, and it is this that I found rather odd- hence my appeal for further information.

Thank you to all.
Tom Wolfe wrote:
Gregory, Encho, thank you for your responses. I am of course familiar with the falchion and storta, but I don't really regard them as "swords proper".


What would you regard them as? They certainly aren't knives or daggers... Any reference book, museum or arms connoisseur would consider them to be among the most representative types of "single-edged swords" of the medieval period.

-Gregory
Gregory J. Liebau wrote:
Tom Wolfe wrote:
Gregory, Encho, thank you for your responses. I am of course familiar with the falchion and storta, but I don't really regard them as "swords proper".


What would you regard them as? They certainly aren't knives or daggers... Any reference book, museum or arms connoisseur would consider them to be among the most representative types of "single-edged swords" of the medieval period.

-Gregory


I agree- I think it is my personal perception that is at fault and needs to be updated rather than the intrinsic character of the weapons themselves. I am still quite new to learning about mediaeval swords, and I still haven't entirely shed the simplistic view of mediaeval swords all being broadswords. I am learning though....
Tom Wolfe wrote:
Gregory, Encho, thank you for your responses. I am of course familiar with the falchion and storta, but I don't really regard them as "swords proper". The references to kreigsmesser and langes messer were very helpful though. The existence of swords like this which, to my eye, look very similar to a typical broadsword is very interesting and rather begs the question- why didn't they sharpen a cutting edge on both sides?


Falchions/storta/etc. are certainly sword. Messers, on the other hand, are really large knives (hence their names). They were considered as such by the guilds of makers of the time; the distinction was there in period and for most of us remains today. Construction methodology differs, too.

Regarding the question why not sharpen both edges, I am reminded of this topic: Single vs double edged swords
Hey check this out
Hello,

Here is a neat link to a sword that may be a help to your inquiry.

http://www.swordforum.com/forums/showthread.p...nded-Sword
Re: Hey check this out
Lance Morris wrote:
Hello,

Here is a neat link to a sword that may be a help to your inquiry.

http://www.swordforum.com/forums/showthread.p...nded-Sword


Except that's a modern-made sword and doesn't mimic a surviving example. It takes details from a whole bunch of unrelated examples. In the end, it's more dissimilar to extant examples than it is similar.
Tom Wolfe wrote:
The existence of swords like this which, to my eye, look very similar to a typical broadsword is very interesting and rather begs the question- why didn't they sharpen a cutting edge on both sides?


For the same blade width, thickness, and cross-sectional area along the length of the blade, a single-edged blade gives you a more acute edge angle (wedge cross-section vs diamond cross-section), and potentially better cutting (with the cost of a possibly more fragile edge). There are also blade construction types that are easier for single-edged blades. E.g., inserted-edge construction, and various laminated constructions. Differential quenching or tempering is also easier with single-edged blades.

Similar swords are seen from China, single-edged swords (i.e., dao) which look like double-edged swords (i.e., jian) in profile.

While it can be useful to have two edges, you usually only cut with one edge at a time, so single-edged is fine, too. Then there is the common compromise between the two, where the back edge is only partial (perhaps only 6" or so near the point, or it can be 1/3 or 1/2 of the blade).
The other reason why you don't sharpen all of the back edge on many single-edged swords is that a thicker edge (the "spine") of the sword, allows you to create a wedge-shaped blade. This point is implicit in Timo's comment, yet I felt it was worth making it more explicit.

Related to this topic, have you seen the so-called "Maciejowski chopper"? It probably was a single-edged sword, too:

[ Linked Image ]

Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum