Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > The European Knight vs. The Japanese Samurai Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 
Author Message
Christopher Lee




Location: Sunshine Coast, Australia
Joined: 18 Apr 2006

Posts: 160

PostPosted: Sat 13 Dec, 2008 11:44 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Dan Howard wrote:
Max Chouinard wrote:
Quote:
Stone walls.

Common sense dictates that Stone > Paper,

thus, Byzantine walls > Japanese walls.

Therefore, French knights > Japanese walls.

The existence of prolonged siege warfare in Japan proves that Japanese knights < Japanese walls.

There fore, French(European) Knights > Japanese knights.

QED.


That was a joke... right?


It was more sensible than most posts on this subject.


I dunno, i've just been waiting for someone to try and prove their arguement by referencing hit points, armour bonuses and dexterity.
View user's profile Send private message
Bill Sahigan





Joined: 06 Jun 2008

Posts: 56

PostPosted: Sun 14 Dec, 2008 12:26 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

that would be less than classy.
View user's profile Send private message
Lafayette C Curtis




Location: Indonesia
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Reading list: 7 books

Posts: 2,698

PostPosted: Sun 14 Dec, 2008 4:28 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Bennison N wrote:
I don't agree that a Naginata is that much better than European pole-arms...


Well, there's actually an article ( http://l-clausewitz.livejournal.com/379176.html ) out there about this subject, which says that simplistic comparisons like "naginata is better than halberd" and the like actually insult the rich martial heritage of both the East and the West....

(Yes, sorry for pulling the discussion back into a rather more serious direction. It's entirely unintentional. Wink )
View user's profile Send private message
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Sun 14 Dec, 2008 7:13 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I need to remind people that if you don't have anything of stubstance to add to the discussion or don't like it, simply stay out of it. Trying to make a farce out of it only draws more attention to it.

Let's stay on topic, please.

Thank you.

Happy

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Max Chouinard




Location: Quebec, Qc
Joined: 23 Apr 2008

Posts: 108

PostPosted: Sun 14 Dec, 2008 2:14 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Quote:
My point is that the 16th century wako were still an example of both Japanese and non-Japanese kenjutsu exponents.

Does that not count for something, in this discussion?


Note that I didn't say there were not any bushi in these contingents, but they were rare occasions. Now of course it could reveal something, but can we agree that what is shown is mostly that both groups could have been a match for each other?

Quote:
I already mentioned the strong influence that wako swords and swordsmanship had on the Ming. Thomas Chen, Yang Jwing-Ming, and others have noted that. Given that strong kenjutsu element that was apparently there, Chris Peers' claim above doesn't sound all that surprising.


That's an hypothesis, but one that is not accepted by all, nor completely understood.

Maxime Chouinard

Antrim Bata

Quebec City Kenjutsu

I don't do longsword
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Matthew Overstreet




Location: United States
Joined: 14 Dec 2008

Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sun 14 Dec, 2008 4:44 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Allen G. wrote:

Since we cannot compare individual talent and have to go by averages, the average technological edge of european arms&armour would be my pick if i had to bet money.


Yeah, hand to hand aside, I've heard europeans had access to much better iron ore. I read in an article once that the evolution of european swords and japanese swords was a result of the quality difference in the ore they used; and, that european swords of that period would likely break a japanese sword in half because it was much better quality.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Max Chouinard




Location: Quebec, Qc
Joined: 23 Apr 2008

Posts: 108

PostPosted: Sun 14 Dec, 2008 6:29 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Quote:
that european swords of that period would likely break a japanese sword in half because it was much better quality.


That's a gross overstatement that really reflects the other extreme weve got through in deconstructing myths about european swords. The Japanese ore wasn't ideal, but keep in mind they weren't necessarily using it, they imported european and Indian ore very frequently. It's only after the country closed itself and then again with the new reglementations on what made a nihonto in recent times, that tamahagane became they only acceptable ore. And according to period source, their iron was actually good compared to others; the English tried to sell some of their in Japan, it was a big failure as the locals considered it inferior to what they could normally obtain. Also, once the folding process was successfully done, the sword was good as any other.

Maxime Chouinard

Antrim Bata

Quebec City Kenjutsu

I don't do longsword
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > The European Knight vs. The Japanese Samurai
Page 5 of 5 Reply to topic
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum