Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Wearing a sword on one's back Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next 
Author Message
Ciaran Daly





Joined: 03 Sep 2006

Posts: 55

PostPosted: Thu 14 Dec, 2006 2:13 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

James Barker wrote:
Ciaran Daly wrote:
Practitioners of many Phillipino styles might disagree strongly with you on that one, Nathan (as might many of the katana or spadroon-wielding fellows they fought).


Do Phillipino combats use 2 swords or 2 sticks? Apples to oranges.

Two rapiers were used historically but there is not evidence of 2 broad swords used at once, ever seen it used in the SCA? It looks clumsy even in a game with round sticks instead of swords.


I'm a little surprised that anyone would think the Philipinos fought their wars with sticks.

To be sure, they knew (and know) how to use both the short cutting and thrusting sword and for training (and casual carry) a length of rattan. Three guesses as to which implement they preferred to take to battle against the Chinese, Conquistadors, U.S. Marines & Imperial Japanese Army?

To clarify: they used (among other weapons) swords singly and in pairs - short swords, later on machetes in WW2 and the Pineapple Rebellion, but they also practiced with sticks or the shortsword version of what we might call wooden wasters (they dueled formally with these as well), and often capped walking sticks with small pointed pieces of brass to better utilize the thrust should they find themselves in a violent confrontation away from their war gear. The Spaniards wore half armor, and many of the techniques I was taught reflected this: overhead stabs into the gorget, slices at the vulnerable legs or hands, etc.
View user's profile Send private message
James Barker




Location: Ashburn VA
Joined: 20 Apr 2005

Posts: 365

PostPosted: Thu 14 Dec, 2006 5:33 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Again it is still apples to oranges, there is no evidence of the medieval broadsword being used two at a time it was impractical for their style of warfare.
James Barker
Historic Life http://www.historiclife.com/index.html
Archer in La Belle Compagnie http://www.labelle.org/
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Kyro R. Lantsberger





Joined: 21 Apr 2006

Posts: 39

PostPosted: Thu 14 Dec, 2006 5:53 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

[quote="Joe Fults"]
Kyro R. Lantsberger wrote:

Does North cite a souce(s) for this and does he explicitly say or show back scabbard in this context? Does he give a list of the contemporary sources he is drawing information from? As is, its hard to evaluate the merit of the statement, and what it really refers to.


This book has different authors for each Chapter. Anthony North is listed as Senior Research Assistant , Department of Metalwork, Victoria &Albert Museum.........Good question as to what that might mean.

Each Chapter has an enormous bibliography with no footnotes. I would probably guess that the vagueness of the reference and imprecise use of terms might point to this describing a baldric.

Always fun to speculate.
View user's profile Send private message
Ciaran Daly





Joined: 03 Sep 2006

Posts: 55

PostPosted: Thu 14 Dec, 2006 5:36 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

James Barker wrote:
Again it is still apples to oranges, there is no evidence of the medieval broadsword being used two at a time it was impractical for their style of warfare.


Perhaps not in Europe, but the Moros used 36 inch or so swords, and double weapon use has been very common in the Phillipines throughout their history. I'm not going to argue about whether such a style would be practical in Medieval Europe, lest I see more references to fruit, but at the very least I can say that it was practical in the time & place the style developed to use two pretty good sized blades. Krabi Krabong was also very big on using two fairly large saber-like blades at once. The common denominator seems to me to be that in stinking hot jungle countries where armor is minimal, turning yourself into a human cuisinart worked just fine.

Now if facing a gentleman in full tournament plate who can barge through your singlehand cutters like a tank and bash your brains in with a mace... maybe not such a great call. But many of these styles were very good at striking at hands and vulnerable points in armor, so one might be surprised. Again, the Spanish certainly were, and they had plenty of plate armor. It's worth noting that mostly they managed to hang on to a few square blocks of Manila, and little else.

I could easily be wrong, but it seems to me that at least part of the question on people's minds in this thread seems to have been: "is there an effective fighting style that utilizes two broadsword-sized blades at once?" The answer is "yes, but perhaps not in Europe." The history of martial arts being what it is however, I would not be too surprised to see some obscure European style that did use them come to light eventually.
View user's profile Send private message
Bryce Felperin




Location: San Jose, CA
Joined: 16 Feb 2006

Posts: 552

PostPosted: Thu 14 Dec, 2006 6:40 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Ciaran Daly wrote:
James Barker wrote:
Again it is still apples to oranges, there is no evidence of the medieval broadsword being used two at a time it was impractical for their style of warfare.


Perhaps not in Europe, but the Moros used 36 inch or so swords, and double weapon use has been very common in the Phillipines throughout their history. I'm not going to argue about whether such a style would be practical in Medieval Europe, lest I see more references to fruit, but at the very least I can say that it was practical in the time & place the style developed to use two pretty good sized blades. Krabi Krabong was also very big on using two fairly large saber-like blades at once. The common denominator seems to me to be that in stinking hot jungle countries where armor is minimal, turning yourself into a human cuisinart worked just fine.

Now if facing a gentleman in full tournament plate who can barge through your singlehand cutters like a tank and bash your brains in with a mace... maybe not such a great call. But many of these styles were very good at striking at hands and vulnerable points in armor, so one might be surprised. Again, the Spanish certainly were, and they had plenty of plate armor. It's worth noting that mostly they managed to hang on to a few square blocks of Manila, and little else.

I could easily be wrong, but it seems to me that at least part of the question on people's minds in this thread seems to have been: "is there an effective fighting style that utilizes two broadsword-sized blades at once?" The answer is "yes, but perhaps not in Europe." The history of martial arts being what it is however, I would not be too surprised to see some obscure European style that did use them come to light eventually.


I would like to point out another factor in both two sword fighting styles and carrying a sword on your back. Namely that wearing plate armor restricts your movement to some extent and simply doesn't allow you to even reach behind your back! I have seen and asked questions of the the guys in our group who wear armor and they have demonstrated that they couldn't reach up above shoulder level with their hands, much less reach something on their back. This is while wearing a breastplate, spalders/paldrons and full arms.

Likewise wielding too weapons in a fight is difficult, though probably not totally impossible, wearing plate armor. No one I know has even conceived of doing so in their plate armor. They do train using Rapier and Dagger though not when armored.

This would seem to indicate that wearing plate negates the possibility of carrying a sword over your shoulder and I would be very surprised to learn of an historical example of a knight who used too weapons at once.

For those of you who wear chain, can you guys reach for things on your back over your shoulders? Can you guys conceive of using two weapons wearing chain aside from a shield?
View user's profile Send private message
Shane Allee
Industry Professional



Location: South Bend, IN
Joined: 29 Aug 2003

Posts: 506

PostPosted: Thu 14 Dec, 2006 9:45 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

In I.M. Stead's latest book British Iron Age Swords and Scabbards, he address low scabbard suspension and the wearing of the sword on the back in Northern Britain and Scotland.

"Another Source of information relevant to the suspension of the northern scabbards is provided by a series of chalk figurines found in East Yorkshire (Stead 1988). Some may well date from the first century AD, but they depict a native rather than a Roman tradition. Twelve of the figurines represent warriors, all with scabbards. Two of the scabbards are slung on the right side, with the sword handle at the waist , the typical position in the south and on the Continent, and indeed in Roman times (Bishop and Coulston 1993:74 figs 3 and 4). But the other scabbards are definitely worn on the warriors' backs. Each of these scabbards is depicted vertically in the centre of the back, with the sword handle at the shoulders; towards its centre the scabbard crosses a clearly defined belt at the waist. The Group F sword found in burial 107 at Rudston (212) was under an extended skeleton, as if it had been worn on the back. (Stead 1988: fig.10; 1991a: fig. 55).

Shane
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
C. Tomic




Location: Perth, Western Australia
Joined: 09 Dec 2006

Posts: 5

PostPosted: Thu 14 Dec, 2006 9:57 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I'm no expert on medieval stuff, but just a modernish parrelel to the 'it's impractical for combat' argument. During the First and Second world war the Germans always used to sling their rifles diagonally, either on their back or on their front (front in WW1 only). Now i've tried this while wearing a German helmet and unslinging it tends to be difficult, and i've even knocked the helmet off once or twice Big Grin

This way of carrying isn't certainly practical for a battlefield but it does distrbuite the weight a lot better and would be much more comfartable for carrying long distances, something to think about.
View user's profile Send private message
James Barker




Location: Ashburn VA
Joined: 20 Apr 2005

Posts: 365

PostPosted: Fri 15 Dec, 2006 4:52 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Ciaran Daly wrote:
The history of martial arts being what it is however, I would not be too surprised to see some obscure European style that did use them come to light eventually.


Well nothing is obscure about using a case of rapiers (2 full blades at once). It is a perfect unarmored dueling style when the blades become smaller and lighter.

James Barker
Historic Life http://www.historiclife.com/index.html
Archer in La Belle Compagnie http://www.labelle.org/
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ciaran Daly





Joined: 03 Sep 2006

Posts: 55

PostPosted: Fri 15 Dec, 2006 1:26 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

James Barker wrote:
Ciaran Daly wrote:
The history of martial arts being what it is however, I would not be too surprised to see some obscure European style that did use them come to light eventually.


Well nothing is obscure about using a case of rapiers (2 full blades at once). It is a perfect unarmored dueling style when the blades become smaller and lighter.


Which is why everyone here already knows about it.

Using two broadsword-type blades at once would be obscure though, huh? I can just imagine some contemporary of Liberi's or Lichtenauer's teaching such an odd style. Given the outlandish requirements of judicial duels and the like, it's certainly conceivable. But that's only speculation obviously.
View user's profile Send private message
Brenton Hudson




Location: Barnwell, SC
Joined: 21 Dec 2006

Posts: 9

PostPosted: Thu 21 Dec, 2006 8:45 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

So, wearing a sword on your back is very hard, but not impossible to do. That's what I'm thinking y'all are saying. In many stories I have read, such as The Savage Caves by T.H. Lain (it's a book published by Wizards of the Coast and uses the D&D characters), there are characters who wear swords, especially two-handed swords on their backs. In addition, the characters draw the sword using their dominant hand (i.e. if they are right-handed, they draw the sword with their right hand, although this has been stated already in this thread). While this may in fact be done to look cool, it is not impossible to do this. I am surprised that wearing full plate armor would in fact hinder you in drawing a sword on your back.
View user's profile Send private message
Jean Thibodeau




Location: Montreal,Quebec,Canada
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Likes: 50 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 5
Posts: 8,310

PostPosted: Thu 21 Dec, 2006 10:23 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Brenton Hudson wrote:
So, wearing a sword on your back is very hard, but not impossible to do. That's what I'm thinking y'all are saying. In many stories I have read, such as The Savage Caves by T.H. Lain (it's a book published by Wizards of the Coast and uses the D&D characters), there are characters who wear swords, especially two-handed swords on their backs. In addition, the characters draw the sword using their dominant hand (i.e. if they are right-handed, they draw the sword with their right hand, although this has been stated already in this thread). While this may in fact be done to look cool, it is not impossible to do this. I am surprised that wearing full plate armour would in fact hinder you in drawing a sword on your back.


I think the key word here is " characters "! With a standard full scabbard and not some tricked up skeletonized scabbard holding just at the tip of the sword and near the guard the range of motion of the hand won't be enough to clear the lip of the scabbard to pull a long sword out. A short one maybe?

Just do a test: Take a tape measure and hold it up with your hand as high as you can over your head now measure to a point a few inches below your shoulder where the mouth of the scabbard would be and see how long that is !.

I just did it myself and I get 30" maximum and this is holding the tape measure with the very tip of my fingers: Now if it was a sword take away at least 4" for handle length there remains an optimistic 26" for blade length.

Any blade longer than this will not fully come out of the scabbard. A 26" blade is fairly short but still swordlike in length but nowhere near the 35" to 40 " of a LONGSWORD or a true twohander that can be 46" or more.

So unless it's a fairly short sword around 24" to 26 " long, or if you have VERY long arms this is the maximum length you could pull out over the shoulders. ( And it very debatable that even carrying a sword this way has any advantages. )

As far as I'm concerned, and not from a historical perspective, I would carry a sword on my back the same way I would carry luggage and drawing it fast wouldn't even be an option: I would draw another much shorter weapon from belt carry if surprised and if not surprised would have taken the long sword in hand and ditched the scabbard.

I have limited experience wearing armour but raising your hand high over your head or touching you own shoulder with the tip of your fingers takes some effort and is not very favourable to using a scabbard on one's back with ease.

Now I'm sure some who wear armour often can confirm or contradict me with a better level of certainty.

Just don't put too much stock in stuff seen in movies or read in fiction as being accurate to reality and this for just about anything and not just swords.

You can easily give up your freedom. You have to fight hard to get it back!
View user's profile Send private message
Bryce Felperin




Location: San Jose, CA
Joined: 16 Feb 2006

Posts: 552

PostPosted: Thu 21 Dec, 2006 10:29 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Something else I have noticed for this topic.

I have often seen modern machetes that have a sheath that is split down one side and attached by one or two snaps or velco. I believe this for ease of draw when attached to a backpack or rucksack. So I was thinking, you might be able to draw sword from such a sheath over and around your back, but it wouldn't be very well protected in a scabbard if your carrying it this way. May work, may not. I don't have the means to test this at present.
View user's profile Send private message
James Barker




Location: Ashburn VA
Joined: 20 Apr 2005

Posts: 365

PostPosted: Thu 21 Dec, 2006 11:47 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Historically speaking raising ones arm up and over the shoulder in full plate armor would be a dumbass move. The most vulnerable part of full plate is the gaps covered by maille like the underarm. The underarm in s favored place to attack in the harness fighting sections on medieval combat manuals.


I own a fantastic copy of the Churburg 1390s arms in spring made by Jeff Hedgecock at Historic Enterprises and I can tell you there is no chance in hell I could reach a sword handle on my back with those on. You do loose a little flexibility in full armor.

James Barker
Historic Life http://www.historiclife.com/index.html
Archer in La Belle Compagnie http://www.labelle.org/
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Joe Fults




Location: Midwest
Joined: 02 Sep 2003

Posts: 3,646

PostPosted: Thu 21 Dec, 2006 5:13 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Brenton Hudson wrote:
So, wearing a sword on your back is very hard, but not impossible to do. That's what I'm thinking y'all are saying. In many stories I have read, such as The Savage Caves by T.H. Lain (it's a book published by Wizards of the Coast and uses the D&D characters), there are characters who wear swords, especially two-handed swords on their backs. In addition, the characters draw the sword using their dominant hand (i.e. if they are right-handed, they draw the sword with their right hand, although this has been stated already in this thread). While this may in fact be done to look cool, it is not impossible to do this. I am surprised that wearing full plate armor would in fact hinder you in drawing a sword on your back.


Try taking a broom handle and looping some cord around it. Sling the contraption accross you back. Now try to draw the broom handle quickly out of the contraption. I supect that you will find that your arms are inconveniently short.

Now cut the broom handle in half and repeat the process. It may be easier to draw this time, but its probably less comfortable to move about. If its comfortable now, gain some weight and try it again in ten years. :-)

Now try both tricks with a very heavy winter coat on. Its a very poor approximation of plate, but it adds some bulk to your attire which is something plate will do too.

Wearing the sword at your hip neatly avoids all of these annoyances.

"The goal shouldn’t be to avoid being evil; it should be to actively do good." - Danah Boyd
View user's profile Send private message
Ed Toton




Location: Northern VA
Joined: 16 Sep 2005

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 462

PostPosted: Thu 21 Dec, 2006 7:31 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Personally, I can see using a back-sling or back-scabbard as a means of transport only. I find it impractical from the standpoint of having it easily within reach, as you are all pointing out. I have a back-sling that I've attached to the scabbard for one of my longswords, and fully expected it to be impractical, if not impossible, to draw without first removing the whole thing. I wasn't let down. Happy

Quote:
I am surprised that wearing full plate armor would in fact hinder you in drawing a sword on your back.


It does. I know my pauldrons make it difficult to lift my arm at the shoulder higher than horizontal. I can, but the further I go, the more the lames compress together, and eventually you reach a point that you're just not going to pass. My armor isn't 100% historically accurate, but I can see how this would be limiting regardless.

-Ed T. Toton III
ed.toton.org | ModernChivalry.org
My armor photos on facebook
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Lafayette C Curtis




Location: Indonesia
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Reading list: 7 books

Posts: 2,698

PostPosted: Mon 06 Aug, 2007 10:20 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Nate C. wrote:
As to "historically" carrying a sword on the back, I have no real info from a european standpoint. However I remember reading that certain tribes/groups in the Kris wielding parts of the world wore the Kris on their back for traditional reasons. As I recall, it was not universally practiced and only certain regions practiced carrying them this way. Keep in mind that these were larger Kris but still smaller than most european swords. Hope that helps.


What I know of my own native Javanese customs show that the keris was not worn on the back with the hilt protruding over the shoulder--rather, it's worn on the small of the back with the hilt at around waist level. This is not a strange position to use with a dagger-length weapon like the keris. Even so, I seem to recall some mentions that this method of carrying the weapon had two original purposes: first, to hide the weapon from the sight of anybody coming from the wearer's front, and second, to make the weapon rather more difficult to draw than an ordinary sword or knife. Both of them for reasons of politeness.

And note that even the largest keris are still well within the dagger size range...
View user's profile Send private message
Sam N.




Location: Beijing, China
Joined: 03 Mar 2007

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 114

PostPosted: Sun 02 Sep, 2007 8:48 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I think that an important thing also to note here is the task of sheathing the sword. In a back mounted scabbard this is more or less impossible (no matter how easy the Legend of Zelda games make it seem). You would be forced to remove the scabbard from your back in order to sheath your sword.

On the other hand, if there is no need for fast sheathing and unsheathing, then I guess the idea isn't too far-fetched. (The point made about transport is pretty good).
View user's profile Send private message
M. K. Presson




Location: Sherman Oaks
Joined: 19 Sep 2007

Posts: 2

PostPosted: Wed 19 Sep, 2007 12:57 pm    Post subject: Back sheath practicaltiy.         Reply with quote

This topic has helped some in my research for wearing a sword on one's back. I own one for the celtic fairs, and I'm writing a novel where the main character carries a one-and-a-half hand sword on his back. In the art of fiction writing, would it be plausible to keep the sword this way, and if so, what is the most logical direction to wear the sheath for easiest draw for a right handed person? --with the pommel over the right, or left shoulder? Should this fail to be practical for the Fantasy world, is it possible to have the sheath come with attachments to a belt in the case of combat for much easier draw while running down a battle field?

Thanks to anyone who answers. Happy

And God said, "Where hast thou taken mine burrito?"
View user's profile Send private message
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin


myArmoury Admin

PostPosted: Wed 19 Sep, 2007 1:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Back sheath practicaltiy.         Reply with quote

M. K. Presson wrote:
This topic has helped some in my research for wearing a sword on one's back. I own one for the celtic fairs, and I'm writing a novel where the main character carries a one-and-a-half hand sword on his back. In the art of fiction writing, would it be plausible to keep the sword this way, and if so, what is the most logical direction to wear the sheath for easiest draw for a right handed person? --with the pommel over the right, or left shoulder? Should this fail to be practical for the Fantasy world, is it possible to have the sheath come with attachments to a belt in the case of combat for much easier draw while running down a battle field?


Many people believe it's not dramatic enough to write about things that actually were done historically. Others are simply unwilling to research what was done. I'd encourage you to look into the things that history has brought us. I'd wager that you, and other authors, would find that these things provide ample material for dramatic license. In so many cases, reality shows itself far more fantastic than fantasy. Believe it or not.

.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bryce Felperin




Location: San Jose, CA
Joined: 16 Feb 2006

Posts: 552

PostPosted: Wed 19 Sep, 2007 2:10 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I have read two fantasy series where this problem (using a sheathed sword carried on the back) was utilized and overcome.

In one, the Morgaine Saga by C. J. Cherryh, one of the lead characters Morgaine carries her sword on her back in a baldric, but shifts it down to waist carry if fighting seems imminent. Of course her sword generates a black hole at the tip when drawn that sucks in enemies to their doom...so having the extra safety mechanism of shifting its carry to draw it out might be a good thing. ;-)

The other series, the Bahzell books by David Weber, the author uses magic by having the lead characters holy/magical/divine great sword "magically" appear in the characters hand when he wishes to draw it. Hey its fantasy, anything is possible. ;-)

However I'm with Nathan, plenty of historical material is available for a good story line. Along with that I'd say that you can use historical models for how gear and equipment was carried and used in your fantasy novels and it would give your work a more realistic feel than if you used unrealistic conventions for a character's use of their weapons. Just a suggestion mind you, I'm not criticizing. :-)
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Wearing a sword on one's back
Page 6 of 10 Reply to topic
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum