Pinned crossguard on medieval sword.
While I was browsing through my picture collection of falchion-related images, I just noticed something weird on a picture found and shared by J. Elmslie, likely coming from Hermann Historica.

On that surviving falchion/cleaver, which is not in too bad of a condition, there is no crossguard left, but where it should be, there is a tiny hole, clearly for a pin or rivet. It strikes me as quite peculiar: I am not aware of any crossguard secured by such a pin, but it's a kind of technical detail I might simply be ignorant of for not having a deep enough knowledge.

So I'm asking you, more knowledgeable folks, if you ever heard of a pinned crossguard on a medieval sword.


 Attachment: 24.48 KB
transition 0201détail.jpg
Detail of the pin hole.

 Attachment: 94.56 KB
The complete falchion/chopper. [ Download ]
well, there's definitely the small child's sword in the deutsches klingenmuseum (DKM 1961.W.154) which has a tiny rivet pin. and of course, plenty of messer-like single-edged arms.
The hole seems a bit small for it, but I wonder if it might have incorporated a nagel. Pin is more likely to me, but it is curious. Or, someone could have done the unthinkable and drilled a small hole for an inventory tag sometime after its recovery, restoration/stabilization and cataloging process.
The hole looks too small to be a rivet hole for a bagel or similar and I suspect is too small for a cross guard fixing, but also it doesn't look to round, so probably not fashioned, so I suspect a corrosion hole;.


Tod
sorry, can't resist ;)

" rivet hole for a bagel"
:lol:

It is a good thing Bill Scagel never messed around with European messers but more likely to have seen a bagel than a nagel

Cheers
GC
Wow, both Mr. Elmslie and Todeschini here!

I agree it's not a full Nagel hole (in the way we mean Nagel). It's too small. That's why I just called it a pin. But I don't think it's just corrosion either. It may appear deformed because of corrosion though.

But it's really so small, and so unusual, it's been puzzling me the second I noticed it. At least it seems I was mostly right assuming it's very rarely seen on swords, as bot of you well versed expert couldn't readily come with a handful of example of pinned crossguards. I'm not familiar with this child sword in the Klingenmuseum by the way, Mr. Elmslie, would you provide a link or a picture?

Bringing up Messers is an interesting suggestion. I have to admit I found myself speculating that this unusual hole, that has no reason to be there whatsoever on a sword, indicates that it may never have had a crossguard to start with. Cause that 2mm pin or so would surely be way unsufficient to hold and secure a proper sword crossguard if it had to have any structural role, but it seems relevant to hold a bolster (so a sort of "Nagel", but in the more native way of simply a "nail"/pin/rivet, not the HEMA specific word it became) or a ferrule, something that won't be subject to any amount of leverage. But of course a bolster goes on a flat tang, and a ferrule goes on a narrow tang, and here the hole is precisely on the flat blade part of a narrow tang. I'm not aware either of any mixed construction with a ferruled grip where the tang widens to become a sort of partial flat tang under the ferrule. And I really can't picture it being just a bolster either, it wouldn't "articulate" well with any sort of grip.

That's why it's really puzzling me: it makes no sense whatever way I look at it, even going wildly far with my hypothesis.

Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum