Has anyone else seen the new trailer for 'Outlaw King'?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-G1BME8FKw
It looks more accurate than the normal run of horrible "medieval" films that have been coming out recently (Robin Hood, King Arthur, etc). It kinda looks like they tried a bit!
Thoughts?
Z
It's embarrassing how much better this NetFlix series looks that the latest iteration of Robin Hood. The fact that the makers of the series tried to get things write in terms of costuming and arms and armour is impressive. I especially like the sword that looks like Albion's Laird.
I don't know how good the series will be, nor how closely it will match the historical record, but at least it's a lot more respectful than most medieval movies these days.
I don't know how good the series will be, nor how closely it will match the historical record, but at least it's a lot more respectful than most medieval movies these days.
| Craig Peters wrote: |
| I don't know how good the series will be, nor how closely it will match the historical record, but at least it's a lot more respectful than most medieval movies these days. |
It's not a series. It is a movie. I believe the sword is a Albion Laird. However, that style of sword has been dated to the 15th c. not the 14th. It is Scottish though. The chap holding it appears to have put the point in the dirt. Not a very good idea.
Any way, the movie looks promising.
| Lin Robinson wrote: |
| It's not a series. It is a movie. I believe the sword is a Albion Laird. However, that style of sword has been dated to the 15th c. not the 14th. It is Scottish though |
Why do you put it in the 15th? The type XII blade dates primarily from the late 12th to the 14th. Not sure about the guard, as it doesn't fit cleanly into any of the Oakeshott types, but the Scottish were always a bit unique, so that isn't surprising. Round pommels and peen blocks also easily date back to the 13th. I don't think I would deem a sword of this type ahistorical out-of-hand for a late 13th/early14th depiction. I do agree that stabbing the dirt, however, could be deemed abusive.
| Victor R. wrote: | ||
Why do you put it in the 15th? The type XII blade dates primarily from the late 12th to the 14th. Not sure about the guard, as it doesn't fit cleanly into any of the Oakeshott types, but the Scottish were always a bit unique, so that isn't surprising. Round pommels and peen blocks also easily date back to the 13th. I don't think I would deem a sword of this type ahistorical out-of-hand for a late 13th/early14th depiction. I do agree that stabbing the dirt, however, could be deemed abusive. |
I don't. Jack Scott, in an article entitled Three Medieval Swords From Scotland, does. You can find the article in Scottish Weapons and Fortifications 1100 - 1800 edited by David Caldwell.
| Lin Robinson wrote: |
| I don't. Jack Scott, in an article entitled Three Medieval Swords From Scotland, does. You can find the article in Scottish Weapons and Fortifications 1100 - 1800 edited by David Caldwell. |
Not a book I have and I cannot find a link to the article. I'd be interested to see the analysis of a weapon for which the primary elements are heavily used pre-15th, and a blade style that was very rare post-14th, that places the weapon in the 15th. I'm not saying it is an impossible task, but the arguments would need to be pretty tight. And I don't consider "I've never seen one exactly like it in a museum" a tight argument.
Well put Lin. Now I'll have to find my copy and reread it.
| Victor R. wrote: |
|
Not a book I have and I cannot find a link to the article. I'd be interested to see the analysis of a weapon for which the primary elements are heavily used pre-15th, and a blade style that was very rare post-14th, that places the weapon in the 15th. I'm not saying it is an impossible task, but the arguments would need to be pretty tight. And I don't consider "I've never seen one exactly like it in a museum" a tight argument. |
I did not make that argument. In fact I did not argue anything about the sword, just reported that the article referenced dated similar original swords as 15th c. I am certainly no expert on those swords but I do have a copy of the book.
Hi Victor. One thing that I think you should keep in mind is that Albion's next generation line are not exact replicas of historical examples. In this case Albion first designed their XII blades for the Knight. Later they used the same blade for the Laird and Caithness. So rather than being designed from scratch, the Laird and Caithness are just alternative hilts options.
There are a handful of surviving swords with hilts similar to Albion's Laird and as far as I can recall none of them have what I would consider a classic type XII blade. Many of these blades are quite similar to type XIIs in profile, but they have much shorter fullers. So you see these swords in fact don't have blades typical of the 13th and 14th centuries.
All that said I think that it's at least plausible that a sword similar to Albion's Laird could have been seen in early 14th century Scotland.
There are a handful of surviving swords with hilts similar to Albion's Laird and as far as I can recall none of them have what I would consider a classic type XII blade. Many of these blades are quite similar to type XIIs in profile, but they have much shorter fullers. So you see these swords in fact don't have blades typical of the 13th and 14th centuries.
All that said I think that it's at least plausible that a sword similar to Albion's Laird could have been seen in early 14th century Scotland.
Looking at the trailer I don't think that it is a Laird. The hilt is close if not identical, but the blade appears to be double fullered.
| Lin Robinson wrote: | ||
I did not make that argument. In fact I did not argue anything about the sword, just reported that the article referenced dated similar original swords as 15th c. I am certainly no expert on those swords but I do have a copy of the book. |
I didn't claim you did - I was just curious as to the manner in which the article would come to the conclusion and was hoping some of that would be shared - I'd really like to know. However, I've seen arguments often that say "it can't be this, because I've never seen exactly this precise thing in the small sample to which I have access". Alternatively, I'd love to see a reference to anything by Peter Johnsson, discussing his influence, that refers to a sword, or, likely, a group of swords, upon which he drew inspiration when he designed it. Honestly seeking informed analysis - and giving an example of what I don't consider truly "informed".
| Stephen Curtin wrote: |
|
All that said I think that it's at least plausible that a sword similar to Albion's Laird could have been seen in early 14th century Scotland. |
I'd swear I've seen 14th c. Scottish effigies with this style of hilt.. Would have to dig through my books, though. This distraction might prove more enticing than the house chores I'm supposed to be doing this afternoon.
Victor...
The article is over eight pages and detailed. IOW trying to summarize it will be difficult, especially for someone like me who is a generalist and certainly not knowledgeable on sword typology. Perhaps one of the other members can do that or even provide you with a copy of the article, which will hopefully answer your questions.
This book has been around since 1981 and in and out of print. Amazon has used hardback copies for sale but the cheapest is about $270 and the price skyrockets for the rest to a ridiculous level.
The article is over eight pages and detailed. IOW trying to summarize it will be difficult, especially for someone like me who is a generalist and certainly not knowledgeable on sword typology. Perhaps one of the other members can do that or even provide you with a copy of the article, which will hopefully answer your questions.
This book has been around since 1981 and in and out of print. Amazon has used hardback copies for sale but the cheapest is about $270 and the price skyrockets for the rest to a ridiculous level.
| Joe Maccarrone wrote: | ||
I'd swear I've seen 14th c. Scottish effigies with this style of hilt.. Would have to dig through my books, though. This distraction might prove more enticing than the house chores I'm supposed to be doing this afternoon. |
As far as I know the earliest effigy that depicts a hilt like Albion's Laird is of Sir Gilbert de Greenlaw and dates to 1411. If I'm not mistaken all of the 14th effigies depict hilts with lobbed pommels, thus making them more similar to Albion's Caithness rather than the Laird. Also I don't think that any of these effigies dates to early enough in the 14th century to be relevant to events of the first war of independence.
| Stephen Curtin wrote: | ||||
As far as I know the earliest effigy that depicts a hilt like Albion's Laird is of Sir Gilbert de Greenlaw and dates to 1411. If I'm not mistaken all of the 14th effigies depict hilts with lobbed pommels, thus making them more similar to Albion's Caithness rather than the Laird. Also I don't think that any of these effigies dates to early enough in the 14th century to be relevant to events of the first war of independence. |
That is one of the two effigies cited in the book, the other being that of Bricious MacKinnon which dates from the late 14th c.
Funny, the bearded and clear blue eyed Chris Pine reminded me of O Toole for a second (Lion in Winter).
It looks interesting, and I did not see anything making me cringe from the historical accuracy standpoint in the trailer.
Looking forward to it. Wonder what they are going to do with W Wallace who pretty much stole the part of Scotland's liberator in Braveheart leaving little for the posterity of R De Bruce (weak, treacherous political animal vs the manly, true to his word Wallace). Hope this will set the record straight!
It looks interesting, and I did not see anything making me cringe from the historical accuracy standpoint in the trailer.
Looking forward to it. Wonder what they are going to do with W Wallace who pretty much stole the part of Scotland's liberator in Braveheart leaving little for the posterity of R De Bruce (weak, treacherous political animal vs the manly, true to his word Wallace). Hope this will set the record straight!
| Julien M wrote: |
| Funny, the bearded and clear blue eyed Chris Pine reminded me of O Toole for a second (Lion in Winter).
It looks interesting, and I did not see anything making me cringe from the historical accuracy standpoint in the trailer. Looking forward to it. Wonder what they are going to do with W Wallace who pretty much stole the part of Scotland's liberator in Braveheart leaving little for the posterity of R De Bruce (weak, treacherous political animal vs the manly, true to his word Wallace). Hope this will set the record straight! |
[ Linked Image ]
The Bricious McKinnon carving (I think).
Gear certainly suggests 14th c. The hilt is quite worn, but at the least closely resembles the sword in the film. Might be a lobbed pommel, though. <shrug>
I wonder if they'll depict Robert and his buddies murdering John Comyn, or if they'll go for just a straight-forward heroic Bruce? Looks miles better than Braveheart at least.
The Bricious McKinnon carving (I think).
Gear certainly suggests 14th c. The hilt is quite worn, but at the least closely resembles the sword in the film. Might be a lobbed pommel, though. <shrug>
I wonder if they'll depict Robert and his buddies murdering John Comyn, or if they'll go for just a straight-forward heroic Bruce? Looks miles better than Braveheart at least.
Cousin Bricious lived in the late 14th c. Of course the sword, especially since it is an image of a sword, could have been from much earlier times. There are many possibilities.
is it bad that i wanna nitpick the fact that the coat of plates is i think more 1340's? if im not mistaken really early coats of plates are more like the armoured surcoat
also the english spaulders are a bit BIG, and more seemingly reminiscent of mid century stuff?
also the english spaulders are a bit BIG, and more seemingly reminiscent of mid century stuff?
Page 1 of 3
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum