Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Scale Armour (Brunea): Why they fell out of favor? Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3 
Author Message
Dan Howard




Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
Joined: 08 Dec 2004

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 3,636

PostPosted: Sat 22 May, 2021 10:03 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

The style of the lamellar found at Birka is Khazar.
The Birka garrison had plenty of foreign fighters, including Khazars.
IIRC the armour was found in what is believed to be a workshop so it is impossible to tell who wore it.

The only other lamellar finds in Western Europe were in Avar-controlled regions. Lamellar finds in Western Europe disappear after the Avars were driven out. If Western Europeans wore lamellar, one would expect lamellar to continue turning up in the archaeological record after the Avars leave.

Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen and Sword Books
View user's profile Send private message
Matthew Amt




Location: Laurel, MD, USA
Joined: 17 Sep 2003

Posts: 1,456

PostPosted: Sun 23 May, 2021 5:19 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Yikes, I sound like kind of a jerk! Re-reading Kyle's first post, I'm thinking it sounded pretty reasonable, then my response jumps all over him! Sorry, sorry...

Matthew

PS: I hardly *ever* set fire to Viking reenactors for wearing lamellar, any more...
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mark Millman





Joined: 10 Feb 2005

Posts: 581

PostPosted: Sun 23 May, 2021 8:30 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Dear Dan,

On Sunday 23 May 2021, you wrote:
IIRC the armour was found in what is believed to be a workshop so it is impossible to tell who wore it.

Evidently I misremembered. Thanks for the correction!

Best,

Mark
View user's profile Send private message
Len Parker





Joined: 15 Apr 2011

Posts: 484

PostPosted: Sat 12 Mar, 2022 3:28 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

More tantalizing evidence of norse lamellar/scale: https://sagy.vikingove.cz/en/lamellar-armours-of-the-viking-age/
View user's profile Send private message
Iagoba Ferreira





Joined: 15 Sep 2008

Posts: 192

PostPosted: Sat 19 Mar, 2022 12:09 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Answering the first post...

There is physical evidence of scale armour in XVIth century America, discussed here:

gladius.revistas.csic.es/index.php/gladius/article/view/21/0" target="_blank">https://gladius.revistas.csic.es/index.php/gladius/article/view/21/0

Even the MET has some scales:

https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/25372


Given the topic, and to contradict some books (Osprey...) this peculiar example scale armour in the Museo de Armerķa de Alava is undated, unprovenanced but after examining it briefly, it's designed to be functional.



 Attachment: 54.6 KB
vitoria_escamas_809.jpg

View user's profile Send private message
Graham Shearlaw





Joined: 24 Oct 2011
Likes: 1 page

Posts: 151

PostPosted: Tue 22 Mar, 2022 7:08 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Addressing the title question, i will argue for durability, maintenance and hygiene as factors leading to scale and lamellar's decline in use.

Durability
Mail is from made nothing but hard wearing metal, unlike cloth, leather or raw hide , it will not perish, snap, rot, or get eaten by rats, and kept in dry storage its last for ever.

Maintenance, there is minimal replacement of damaged rings after use, other wise its just store dry.
For scale and lamellars there's a semi regular replacement of backing and binding as they wear out from use.

Hygiene, mail doesn't have space to trap dirt or house lice nor an organic component to soak up water and sweat.
A Scale or lamellar armour does and need a considerable disassembly to clean.

You can use most of the above against the viking's must of had gambesons school, normal clothing is free, easier to clean and gives better temperature regulation.
View user's profile Send private message
Dan Howard




Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
Joined: 08 Dec 2004

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 3,636

PostPosted: Tue 22 Mar, 2022 1:52 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

"When soaked with water the armor becomes very heavy and cannot be quickly dried; so that in summer it is oppressive and in winter liable to freeze. Moreover, no amount of washing will completely free the lacing from any mud or blood which may have penetrated it, and on long and distant campaigns it becomes evil-smelling and overrun by ants and lice, with consequent ill effects on the health of the wearer." -- Sakakibara Kozan, Chukokatchu Seisakuben
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen and Sword Books
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Scale Armour (Brunea): Why they fell out of favor?
Page 3 of 3 Reply to topic
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3 All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum