Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Ventral plate Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page Previous  1, 2 
Author Message
Lafayette C Curtis




Location: Indonesia
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Reading list: 7 books

Posts: 2,698

PostPosted: Sun 01 Jun, 2014 6:13 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Yeah. The armour seems to have rather more parts and articulations than what's really necessary in a functional military harness. But adding a very marginal improvement to comfort and/or range of motion for the sake of more bling seems exactly like what the rich and famous would have liked to do.
View user's profile Send private message
Mart Shearer




Location: Jackson, MS, USA
Joined: 18 Aug 2012

Posts: 1,302

PostPosted: Sun 01 Jun, 2014 8:37 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Robert MacPherson wrote:
.... no. That armor has no hole in the backplate

Here's a link to a PDF of the monograph.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&...9033,d.b2U

Mac


So what's the purpose of the hole in the back?

ferrum ferro acuitur et homo exacuit faciem amici sui
View user's profile Send private message
Robert MacPherson
Industry Professional



Location: Jeffersonville USA
Joined: 27 Feb 2008

Posts: 141

PostPosted: Mon 02 Jun, 2014 6:48 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Perhaps that armor had a "dorsal plate" as well. It's a logical extension of the idea. Presumably, the dorsal and ventral plate assemblies could be left buckled together at the shoulders and the whole thing slung on like a poncho. After the buckles were all adjusted properly the backplate and then the breastplate could be bolted into place, followed by the gorget. If the shoulder strap buckles were still accessible before the gorget went on, it would be pretty convenient to make fine fine adjustments at that point.

It seems like exactly the sort of thing that a gadget-loving monarch like Henry VIII would have been delighted with.

Mac

Robert MacPherson
http://www.lightlink.com/armory/
http://billyandcharlie.com/
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Eric S




Location: new orleans
Joined: 22 Nov 2009
Reading list: 8 books

Posts: 805

PostPosted: Mon 02 Jun, 2014 2:20 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Mart Shearer wrote:
Robert MacPherson wrote:
.... no. That armor has no hole in the backplate

Here's a link to a PDF of the monograph.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&...9033,d.b2U

Mac


So what's the purpose of the hole in the back?


If you look at the first image you can see that the hole in the breast plate is used for attaching an auxiliary armor piece, the hole in the back plate may have had the same use. The second image shows the hole in the breast plate unused. Since there is no corresponding image showing the back of these armors there is not way to be sure but it makes sense that the hole on the back plate serves a similar purpose.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Robert MacPherson
Industry Professional



Location: Jeffersonville USA
Joined: 27 Feb 2008

Posts: 141

PostPosted: Wed 04 Jun, 2014 7:18 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Eric,

The "ventral plate" would have originally had a threaded stud riveted to it. The one in New York still has its stud, but the one in the Royal Armouries no longer does. The large hole surrounded by four smaller ones shows where it used to be riveted in place. This stud would have done a dual duty in securing both the breastplate and the reenforcing plate or plates. The armor's jousting grandguard survives, but there may originally have been an alternative reenforcing breast for the field, like the one for the armor in NY.



https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTChC-TfoNYrNFs2Q2eEz_tDJn20eqP5Hqgu1JZl_MlKIPSdR3n

If the artist who made those drawings had done his homework, he would have shown a nut in the second image where he has shown a hole.

I do not know of any examples of reenforcing plates for the back. If we were to speculate, we could imagine a bullet-proof plate that completely covered the back. Such a thing is unprecedented, but we are dealing with Henry VIII; a monarch who was very interested in guns, and novelty, and novel guns etc. Perhaps a newfangled "field and tilt" with bulletproof plates both front and back is the sort of thing that would have pleased him.

Mac

Robert MacPherson
http://www.lightlink.com/armory/
http://billyandcharlie.com/
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Eric S




Location: new orleans
Joined: 22 Nov 2009
Reading list: 8 books

Posts: 805

PostPosted: Wed 04 Jun, 2014 9:16 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Robert MacPherson wrote:
Eric,

The "ventral plate" would have originally had a threaded stud riveted to it. The one in New York still has its stud, but the one in the Royal Armouries no longer does. The large hole surrounded by four smaller ones shows where it used to be riveted in place. This stud would have done a dual duty in securing both the breastplate and the reenforcing plate or plates. The armor's jousting grandguard survives, but there may originally have been an alternative reenforcing breast for the field, like the one for the armor in NY.


https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTChC-TfoNYrNFs2Q2eEz_tDJn20eqP5Hqgu1JZl_MlKIPSdR3n


Robert, here is a larger image showing the threaded stud you mention.


Henry VIII Armor for field and tournament - exchange pieces, England (Greenwich), 1527. Met Museum.
http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/b...fc0454.jpg


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Robert MacPherson
Industry Professional



Location: Jeffersonville USA
Joined: 27 Feb 2008

Posts: 141

PostPosted: Thu 05 Jun, 2014 6:07 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thank you, Eric! I could not figure out how to get that Flikr image to appear in the post.

Mac

Robert MacPherson
http://www.lightlink.com/armory/
http://billyandcharlie.com/
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Ventral plate
Page 2 of 2 Reply to topic
Go to page Previous  1, 2 All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum