why was the safe thumb abandoned for the hinged?
Discussing modern safety requirements of heavy reenactment combat such as SCA and HMB, the topic of thumbs came up. Modern rules require the thumb be fixed to and supported by the backplate of the gauntlet, much like the thumbs on 14th century hourglass gauntlets, this is due to the risk of breaking, dislocating or crushing the thumb, or pretty much shoving it back into the arm (shudder).

However, ince the hourglass gauntlets went out of fashion, we see a boom in late 14th century thumbs being attatched by hinges or separate plates, and by the 15th century, nearly all plate gauntlets have the less safe, more technically challenging hinged thumb-piece.

The hinged thumb does offer larger plate coverage of the hand, however, it exposes an integral part of your grip to being literally bent out of shape or smushed.

So why is there such a plethora of a hard to make, structurally weak piece of protection for the thumb? What am I missing?
To support thumb grip maybe? There are a lot of longsword positions that require it. See link

http://www.hroarr.com/black-lance-5-finger-hema-gloves/

Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum